Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12275
Ann Gottert, Sanyukta Mathur, Mayi Gnofam, Jim Sailer, Julie Pulerwitz, Lisa B Haddad
{"title":"Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.","authors":"Ann Gottert, Sanyukta Mathur, Mayi Gnofam, Jim Sailer, Julie Pulerwitz, Lisa B Haddad","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence is needed in low- and middle-income countries regarding men's willingness to use new male contraceptive methods in development, preferences regarding method attributes, and what shapes willingness/preferences. We analyzed data from cross-sectional surveys with 611 men in Malawi, concerning willingness to use each of four types of new male methods. Mean age was 24.5 years; half (50 percent) were married/cohabiting. Over half (51 percent) of men expressed willingness to use at least one new male method, including a topical contraceptive gel (33 percent), injection (32 percent), pill (29 percent), and implant (14 percent). Many male product attributes were considered important (with 59-67 percent endorsement), including ease of use, comfort of use, side effects, partner approval, type of method, frequency of facility visits, and cost. A prevalent reported reason for willingness was to \"share responsibility for family planning with my partner\" (44 percent). In multivariate regression analyses, willingness was inversely associated with inequitable gender attitudes (p < 0.001) and was not associated with married/cohabiting status, using condoms, or perceived risk for HIV. These findings add to growing evidence that a majority of men express willingness to use new male contraceptive methods like a topical gel, injectable, or pill. Reflection around gender roles is likely critical within future education about male contraceptive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":"215-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is needed in low- and middle-income countries regarding men's willingness to use new male contraceptive methods in development, preferences regarding method attributes, and what shapes willingness/preferences. We analyzed data from cross-sectional surveys with 611 men in Malawi, concerning willingness to use each of four types of new male methods. Mean age was 24.5 years; half (50 percent) were married/cohabiting. Over half (51 percent) of men expressed willingness to use at least one new male method, including a topical contraceptive gel (33 percent), injection (32 percent), pill (29 percent), and implant (14 percent). Many male product attributes were considered important (with 59-67 percent endorsement), including ease of use, comfort of use, side effects, partner approval, type of method, frequency of facility visits, and cost. A prevalent reported reason for willingness was to "share responsibility for family planning with my partner" (44 percent). In multivariate regression analyses, willingness was inversely associated with inequitable gender attitudes (p < 0.001) and was not associated with married/cohabiting status, using condoms, or perceived risk for HIV. These findings add to growing evidence that a majority of men express willingness to use new male contraceptive methods like a topical gel, injectable, or pill. Reflection around gender roles is likely critical within future education about male contraceptive methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马拉维男性对新型男性避孕方法的使用意愿和偏好。
中低收入国家需要有关男性在发展中使用新型男性避孕方法的意愿、对方法属性的偏好以及影响意愿/偏好的因素的证据。我们分析了对马拉维 611 名男性进行的横断面调查数据,这些数据涉及使用四种新型男性避孕方法的意愿。平均年龄为 24.5 岁;半数(50%)已婚/同居。超过一半(51%)的男性表示愿意使用至少一种新的男性避孕方法,包括外用避孕凝胶(33%)、注射(32%)、避孕药(29%)和皮下埋植(14%)。许多男性产品的属性都被认为是重要的(59%-67%的人表示赞同),包括使用方便、使用舒适、副作用、伴侣认可、方法类型、设施访问频率和成本。据报告,"与伴侣共同承担计划生育责任"(44%)是人们普遍愿意使用的原因。在多变量回归分析中,意愿与不公平的性别态度成反比(p < 0.001),与已婚/同居状况、使用安全套或感知到的 HIV 风险无关。这些发现补充了越来越多的证据,即大多数男性表示愿意使用新的男性避孕方法,如局部凝胶、注射或药丸。在未来的男性避孕方法教育中,围绕性别角色的反思可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
期刊最新文献
Unwanted Family Planning Including Unwanted Sterilization: Preliminary Prevalence Estimates for India. The Reliability of Contraceptive Discontinuation Reporting in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda. Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania. Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts Women's Perspectives on the Unique Benefits and Challenges of Self‐Injectable Contraception: A Four‐Country In‐Depth Interview Study in Sub‐Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1