Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12275
Ann Gottert, Sanyukta Mathur, Mayi Gnofam, Jim Sailer, Julie Pulerwitz, Lisa B Haddad
{"title":"Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.","authors":"Ann Gottert, Sanyukta Mathur, Mayi Gnofam, Jim Sailer, Julie Pulerwitz, Lisa B Haddad","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence is needed in low- and middle-income countries regarding men's willingness to use new male contraceptive methods in development, preferences regarding method attributes, and what shapes willingness/preferences. We analyzed data from cross-sectional surveys with 611 men in Malawi, concerning willingness to use each of four types of new male methods. Mean age was 24.5 years; half (50 percent) were married/cohabiting. Over half (51 percent) of men expressed willingness to use at least one new male method, including a topical contraceptive gel (33 percent), injection (32 percent), pill (29 percent), and implant (14 percent). Many male product attributes were considered important (with 59-67 percent endorsement), including ease of use, comfort of use, side effects, partner approval, type of method, frequency of facility visits, and cost. A prevalent reported reason for willingness was to \"share responsibility for family planning with my partner\" (44 percent). In multivariate regression analyses, willingness was inversely associated with inequitable gender attitudes (p < 0.001) and was not associated with married/cohabiting status, using condoms, or perceived risk for HIV. These findings add to growing evidence that a majority of men express willingness to use new male contraceptive methods like a topical gel, injectable, or pill. Reflection around gender roles is likely critical within future education about male contraceptive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is needed in low- and middle-income countries regarding men's willingness to use new male contraceptive methods in development, preferences regarding method attributes, and what shapes willingness/preferences. We analyzed data from cross-sectional surveys with 611 men in Malawi, concerning willingness to use each of four types of new male methods. Mean age was 24.5 years; half (50 percent) were married/cohabiting. Over half (51 percent) of men expressed willingness to use at least one new male method, including a topical contraceptive gel (33 percent), injection (32 percent), pill (29 percent), and implant (14 percent). Many male product attributes were considered important (with 59-67 percent endorsement), including ease of use, comfort of use, side effects, partner approval, type of method, frequency of facility visits, and cost. A prevalent reported reason for willingness was to "share responsibility for family planning with my partner" (44 percent). In multivariate regression analyses, willingness was inversely associated with inequitable gender attitudes (p < 0.001) and was not associated with married/cohabiting status, using condoms, or perceived risk for HIV. These findings add to growing evidence that a majority of men express willingness to use new male contraceptive methods like a topical gel, injectable, or pill. Reflection around gender roles is likely critical within future education about male contraceptive methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马拉维男性对新型男性避孕方法的使用意愿和偏好。
中低收入国家需要有关男性在发展中使用新型男性避孕方法的意愿、对方法属性的偏好以及影响意愿/偏好的因素的证据。我们分析了对马拉维 611 名男性进行的横断面调查数据,这些数据涉及使用四种新型男性避孕方法的意愿。平均年龄为 24.5 岁;半数(50%)已婚/同居。超过一半(51%)的男性表示愿意使用至少一种新的男性避孕方法,包括外用避孕凝胶(33%)、注射(32%)、避孕药(29%)和皮下埋植(14%)。许多男性产品的属性都被认为是重要的(59%-67%的人表示赞同),包括使用方便、使用舒适、副作用、伴侣认可、方法类型、设施访问频率和成本。据报告,"与伴侣共同承担计划生育责任"(44%)是人们普遍愿意使用的原因。在多变量回归分析中,意愿与不公平的性别态度成反比(p < 0.001),与已婚/同居状况、使用安全套或感知到的 HIV 风险无关。这些发现补充了越来越多的证据,即大多数男性表示愿意使用新的男性避孕方法,如局部凝胶、注射或药丸。在未来的男性避孕方法教育中,围绕性别角色的反思可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
期刊最新文献
Searching for Needles in a Haystack: Exploring Alternative Operational Approaches to Classify the Safety of Induced Abortions Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Data From Two Sub-Saharan African Settings. Are Contraceptive Method Preferences Stable? Measuring Change in the Preferred Method among Kenyan Women. The Global Adolescent Fertility Decline is Counteracted by Increasing Teen Births in Sub-Saharan Africa. Assessing Trends in the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy: A Cautionary Note. Men's Willingness to Use and Preferences for Novel Male Contraceptive Methods in Malawi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1