Mortality in the Victorian asylum: was it so high? Standardised Mortality Rate compared with historical methods.

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1177/0957154X241269206
Charlotte Richardson, Alastair Robson, Loopinder Sood, I Nicol Ferrier, Andy Owen
{"title":"Mortality in the Victorian asylum: was it so high? Standardised Mortality Rate compared with historical methods.","authors":"Charlotte Richardson, Alastair Robson, Loopinder Sood, I Nicol Ferrier, Andy Owen","doi":"10.1177/0957154X241269206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mortality is closely linked to age, sex, and social and historical context. Standardised Mortality Rates (SMR) address these contextual factors by comparing mortality in a population under study with that in people of the same age and sex, the same period in history and from a similar cultural context. We use records from the Hatton Asylum and contemporaneous census data in order to calculate SMR in the asylum population, showing rates that were about 2.5 times greater than the population at the time. This is much lower than crude mortality rates, which we calculated as being more than seven times greater than in the population. The SMR method may enable a more meaningful understanding of mortality in asylums or other institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45965,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X241269206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mortality is closely linked to age, sex, and social and historical context. Standardised Mortality Rates (SMR) address these contextual factors by comparing mortality in a population under study with that in people of the same age and sex, the same period in history and from a similar cultural context. We use records from the Hatton Asylum and contemporaneous census data in order to calculate SMR in the asylum population, showing rates that were about 2.5 times greater than the population at the time. This is much lower than crude mortality rates, which we calculated as being more than seven times greater than in the population. The SMR method may enable a more meaningful understanding of mortality in asylums or other institutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维多利亚时期精神病院的死亡率:有那么高吗?标准化死亡率与历史方法的比较。
死亡率与年龄、性别、社会和历史背景密切相关。标准化死亡率(SMR)通过将所研究人群的死亡率与同年龄、同性别、同历史时期以及类似文化背景下的人群死亡率进行比较,来解决这些背景因素。我们利用哈顿庇护所的记录和同期人口普查数据来计算庇护所人口的 SMR,结果显示其死亡率约为当时人口的 2.5 倍。这比粗死亡率要低得多,我们计算出的粗死亡率是人口粗死亡率的七倍多。采用 SMR 方法可以更有意义地了解庇护所或其他机构的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: History of Psychiatry publishes research articles, analysis and information across the entire field of the history of mental illness and the forms of medicine, psychiatry, cultural response and social policy which have evolved to understand and treat it. It covers all periods of history up to the present day, and all nations and cultures.
期刊最新文献
The saga of James Lucett and the process for curing insanity, Part 2 (1814-38): 'Insanity cured'. Human radiation for medicine, spiritism and hypnosis in Argentina: scientific controversies around vital radiations (1880-1930). Cheerfulness in the history of psychiatry. Marcel Réja and theatre therapy. Phrenitis and the pathology of the mind in western medical thought (fifth century BCE to twentieth century cE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1