Broaching body size and sizeism: Input from specialized clinicians

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Body Image Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101775
Kelly M. King , Brittany Wyche , Lindsey Umstead
{"title":"Broaching body size and sizeism: Input from specialized clinicians","authors":"Kelly M. King ,&nbsp;Brittany Wyche ,&nbsp;Lindsey Umstead","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Broaching issues of identity and power with clients in the context of their mental health care is affirmed as an effective multicultural and social justice counseling skill by a growing evidence base. Considerations for broaching body size, including size difference and sizeism, with clients has not yet been studied, thus clinicians lack guidelines for facilitating these conversations. In this consensual qualitative research study, we present themes involved in broaching body topics based on our interviews with nine clinicians specialized in treating clients with eating disorders and body-related counseling concerns. Themes addressed counselor development, conceptualization of broaching, clinical-decision-making, practice, and impact of broaching body topics in session. Clinicians identified professional and personal developments they pursued and would advocate for training future clinicians to better serve clients. Descriptions of unique and shared aspects of broaching clients’ intersectionality and body-size specifically depict avenues for tailoring broaching conversations. Specific examples of effective and ineffective broaching conversations, including language used and psychoeducational components, provide recommendations for practice and connect to observed impacts on the client, counselor, and counseling process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101775"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524000974","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Broaching issues of identity and power with clients in the context of their mental health care is affirmed as an effective multicultural and social justice counseling skill by a growing evidence base. Considerations for broaching body size, including size difference and sizeism, with clients has not yet been studied, thus clinicians lack guidelines for facilitating these conversations. In this consensual qualitative research study, we present themes involved in broaching body topics based on our interviews with nine clinicians specialized in treating clients with eating disorders and body-related counseling concerns. Themes addressed counselor development, conceptualization of broaching, clinical-decision-making, practice, and impact of broaching body topics in session. Clinicians identified professional and personal developments they pursued and would advocate for training future clinicians to better serve clients. Descriptions of unique and shared aspects of broaching clients’ intersectionality and body-size specifically depict avenues for tailoring broaching conversations. Specific examples of effective and ineffective broaching conversations, including language used and psychoeducational components, provide recommendations for practice and connect to observed impacts on the client, counselor, and counseling process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破体型和体型歧视:专业临床医生的意见。
越来越多的证据表明,在心理健康护理中与客户探讨身份和权力问题是一种有效的多元文化和社会公正咨询技巧。目前还没有研究过与求助者讨论体型问题(包括体型差异和体型歧视)时需要考虑的因素,因此临床医生缺乏促进这些对话的指导原则。在这一共识性定性研究中,我们根据对九名专门治疗饮食失调症和身体相关咨询问题的临床医生的访谈,提出了涉及身体话题的主题。这些主题涉及咨询师的发展、身体咨询的概念化、临床决策、实践以及在治疗过程中提及身体话题的影响。临床医生指出了他们所追求的专业和个人发展,并主张对未来的临床医生进行培训,以便更好地为客户服务。在介绍客户的交叉性和身体尺寸时,对其独特性和共同性进行了描述,具体描绘了量身定制介绍性对话的途径。有效和无效引导对话的具体实例,包括使用的语言和心理教育内容,为实践提供了建议,并与观察到的对客户、咨询师和咨询过程的影响相联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation and validation of the Body Image Life Disengagement Questionnaire (BILD-Q) for use in Hindi among adolescents in semi-rural India. Translation and psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Body Acceptance by Others Scale-2 (BAOS-2) Sexual satisfaction mediates daily associations between body satisfaction and relationship satisfaction in new parent couples Links of weight and muscularity teasing with eating disorder symptomatology, eating-related psychosocial impairment, and intuitive eating in Chinese men: Teasing directions and combinations matter A longitudinal study on the relationships between social media ideals exposure and thin-ideal internalization, social appearance anxiety, and cosmetic surgery consideration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1