Practice Facilitation to Address Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2371
Alison N Huffstetler, Gabriela Villalobos, Ben Webel, Michelle S Rockwell, Adam Funk, Roy T Sabo, John W Epling, E Marshall Brooks, Jacqueline B Britz, Beth A Bortz, Dace S Svikis, Albert J Arias, Ryan Nguyen Tran, Alex H Krist
{"title":"Practice Facilitation to Address Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Alison N Huffstetler, Gabriela Villalobos, Ben Webel, Michelle S Rockwell, Adam Funk, Roy T Sabo, John W Epling, E Marshall Brooks, Jacqueline B Britz, Beth A Bortz, Dace S Svikis, Albert J Arias, Ryan Nguyen Tran, Alex H Krist","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is the fourth most preventable cause of death in the US. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care clinicians routinely screen all adults 18 years and older for UAU; however, this preventive service is poorly implemented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if practice facilitation improved delivery of the recommended care for UAU compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This practice-level cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted across diverse and representative primary care practices throughout Virginia. A total of 76 primary care practices enrolled between October 2019 and January 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Practices received immediate (intervention) or 6-month delayed (control) practice facilitation, which included tailored educational sessions, workflow management, and tools for addressing UAU.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes included the increase in recommended screening for UAU, brief interventions, referral for counseling, and medication treatment. Data were collected via medical record review (structured and free text data) and transcripts of practice facilitator sessions and exits interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 76 primary care practices enrolled, 32 were randomized to intervention and 35 to control; 11 789 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [16.3] years; 61.1% women) were randomly selected for analysis, with patient demographics similar to Virginia at large. From baseline to 6 months after intervention, screening with a validated instrument increased from 2.1% (95% CI, 0.5%-8.4%) to 35.5% (95% CI, 11.5%-69.9%) in the intervention group compared to 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.8%) to 1.4% (95% CI, 0.3%-5.8%) in the control group (P < .001). Brief office-based interventions for the intervention group increased from 26.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-45.8%) to 62.6% (95% CI, 43.6%-78.3%) vs 45.5% (95% CI, 28.0%-64.1%) to 55.1% (95% CI, 36.5%-72.3%) in the control group (P = .008). Identification of UAU, referral for counseling, and medication treatment had similar changes for both groups. Qualitative analyses of transcripts revealed that few clinicians understood the preventive service prior to practice facilitation, but at the end most felt much more competent and confident with screening and brief intervention for UAU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cluster randomized clinical trial demonstrated that practice facilitation can help primary care practices to better implement screening and counseling for UAU into their routine workflow. Effective primary care practice implementation interventions such as this can have a profound effect on the health of communities. Given the number of people that the participating practices care for, this intervention resulted in an additional 114 604 patients being screened annually for UAU who would not have been otherwise.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248023.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 8","pages":"e242371"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is the fourth most preventable cause of death in the US. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care clinicians routinely screen all adults 18 years and older for UAU; however, this preventive service is poorly implemented.

Objective: To determine if practice facilitation improved delivery of the recommended care for UAU compared to usual care.

Design, setting, and participants: This practice-level cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted across diverse and representative primary care practices throughout Virginia. A total of 76 primary care practices enrolled between October 2019 and January 2023.

Intervention: Practices received immediate (intervention) or 6-month delayed (control) practice facilitation, which included tailored educational sessions, workflow management, and tools for addressing UAU.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes included the increase in recommended screening for UAU, brief interventions, referral for counseling, and medication treatment. Data were collected via medical record review (structured and free text data) and transcripts of practice facilitator sessions and exits interviews.

Results: Of the 76 primary care practices enrolled, 32 were randomized to intervention and 35 to control; 11 789 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [16.3] years; 61.1% women) were randomly selected for analysis, with patient demographics similar to Virginia at large. From baseline to 6 months after intervention, screening with a validated instrument increased from 2.1% (95% CI, 0.5%-8.4%) to 35.5% (95% CI, 11.5%-69.9%) in the intervention group compared to 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.8%) to 1.4% (95% CI, 0.3%-5.8%) in the control group (P < .001). Brief office-based interventions for the intervention group increased from 26.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-45.8%) to 62.6% (95% CI, 43.6%-78.3%) vs 45.5% (95% CI, 28.0%-64.1%) to 55.1% (95% CI, 36.5%-72.3%) in the control group (P = .008). Identification of UAU, referral for counseling, and medication treatment had similar changes for both groups. Qualitative analyses of transcripts revealed that few clinicians understood the preventive service prior to practice facilitation, but at the end most felt much more competent and confident with screening and brief intervention for UAU.

Conclusions and relevance: This cluster randomized clinical trial demonstrated that practice facilitation can help primary care practices to better implement screening and counseling for UAU into their routine workflow. Effective primary care practice implementation interventions such as this can have a profound effect on the health of communities. Given the number of people that the participating practices care for, this intervention resulted in an additional 114 604 patients being screened annually for UAU who would not have been otherwise.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健中解决不健康饮酒问题的实践指导:分组随机临床试验。
重要性:不健康饮酒(UAU)是美国第四大可预防死因。美国预防服务工作组建议初级保健临床医生对所有 18 岁及以上的成年人进行不健康饮酒常规筛查;然而,这项预防服务的实施情况却很差:目的:与常规护理相比,确定实践促进是否改善了对尿崩症的推荐护理:这项临床试验是在弗吉尼亚州具有代表性的各种初级医疗机构中进行的。共有 76 家初级医疗机构在 2019 年 10 月至 2023 年 1 月期间参与了该试验:干预:诊所立即接受(干预)或延迟 6 个月(对照)的实践促进,其中包括量身定制的教育课程、工作流程管理和解决 UAU 的工具:主要结果和测量方法:结果包括建议的尿崩症筛查、简短干预、转诊咨询和药物治疗的增加。数据通过病历审查(结构化数据和自由文本数据)、实践促进者课程记录和退出访谈收集:在 76 家初级保健机构中,32 家被随机纳入干预方案,35 家被纳入对照方案;11 789 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 50.1 [16.3] 岁;61.1% 为女性)被随机选中进行分析,患者的人口统计学特征与弗吉尼亚州的总体情况相似。从基线到干预后 6 个月,干预组使用有效工具进行筛查的比例从 2.1%(95% CI,0.5%-8.4%)增加到 35.5%(95% CI,11.5%-69.9%),而对照组为 0.4%(95% CI,0.1%-1.8%)到 1.4%(95% CI,0.3%-5.8%)(P 结论和意义:这项分组随机临床试验表明,实践促进可以帮助基层医疗机构更好地在常规工作流程中实施尿崩症筛查和咨询。像这样有效的初级保健实践实施干预措施可对社区健康产生深远影响。考虑到参与干预的医疗机构所服务的人群数量,这项干预措施使得每年新增114 604名患者接受了尿崩症筛查,而如果没有这项干预措施,这些患者是不会接受筛查的:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04248023.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization. Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care. Errors in Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Health Forum. Surgeon Workforce in Underserved Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1