Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in a Flipped Nursing Course: A Quasiexperimental Study.

Emily Ka Lai Ng
{"title":"Knowledge Acquisition and Retention in a Flipped Nursing Course: A Quasiexperimental Study.","authors":"Emily Ka Lai Ng","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240404-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student knowledge acquisition and retention are essential in nursing training. This study examined differences in content knowledge acquisition and retention between traditional and flipped classroom (FC) formats.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pretest-posttest quasiexperimental design with a follow-up test was used for this study of associate degree nursing students in a Hong Kong community college. The control group (<i>n</i> = 141) included nursing students in a traditional classroom (TC) setting before COVID-19 compared with nursing students in an FC (<i>n</i> = 130) setting during the pandemic. The effects were evaluated before the course, postcourse, and 3 months after the course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content knowledge scores for both groups improved after the course. Students in the FC performed better in the short-term (posttest immediately after the course) and long-term (follow-up-test 3 months later) than students in the TC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the FC method effectively promoted students' knowledge acquisition and retention. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(8):501-506.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240404-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student knowledge acquisition and retention are essential in nursing training. This study examined differences in content knowledge acquisition and retention between traditional and flipped classroom (FC) formats.

Method: A pretest-posttest quasiexperimental design with a follow-up test was used for this study of associate degree nursing students in a Hong Kong community college. The control group (n = 141) included nursing students in a traditional classroom (TC) setting before COVID-19 compared with nursing students in an FC (n = 130) setting during the pandemic. The effects were evaluated before the course, postcourse, and 3 months after the course.

Results: Content knowledge scores for both groups improved after the course. Students in the FC performed better in the short-term (posttest immediately after the course) and long-term (follow-up-test 3 months later) than students in the TC.

Conclusion: Implementing the FC method effectively promoted students' knowledge acquisition and retention. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(8):501-506.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻转式护理课程中的知识获取与保留:一项准实验研究。
背景:学生对知识的掌握和保持在护理培训中至关重要。本研究探讨了传统课堂与翻转课堂(FC)在内容知识掌握和保持方面的差异:本研究以香港一所社区学院的护理学副学士学位学生为研究对象,采用前测-后测的准实验设计,并进行跟踪测试。对照组(n = 141)包括在 COVID-19 之前在传统课堂(TC)环境中学习的护理专业学生,以及在大流行期间在 FC 环境中学习的护理专业学生(n = 130)。对课程前、课程后和课程结束 3 个月后的效果进行了评估:结果:课程结束后,两组学生的内容知识得分均有所提高。FC 组学生在短期(课程结束后立即进行的后测)和长期(3 个月后进行的跟踪测试)的表现均优于 TC 组学生:结论:FC教学法的实施有效促进了学生对知识的掌握和保持。[护理教育杂志,2024;63(8):501-506]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fulbright as Opportunity for U.S. Nursing Educators and International Nursing Schools. Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review. Meeting Quality Improvement Learning Outcomes: Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Student Cross-Specialty Procedural Training: Effective Collaboration and Student Experience. Engaging Nursing Students in Clinical Research Through a Unique Academic-Clinical Partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1