Widely valued but differently experienced; understanding relationships with greenspace in the CBD

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105175
Jennifer Atchison , Cole Hendrigan , Hugh Forehead , Kris French , Eliza de Vet
{"title":"Widely valued but differently experienced; understanding relationships with greenspace in the CBD","authors":"Jennifer Atchison ,&nbsp;Cole Hendrigan ,&nbsp;Hugh Forehead ,&nbsp;Kris French ,&nbsp;Eliza de Vet","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Valuing nature through attention to urban greening offers some remedy to ‘Extinction of Experience’ – the decline in diversity and quality of people’s relationships to nature. Unfortunately, while the role and value of greenspaces are increasingly recognised, recognition and valuing does not always translate into beneficial experiences for urban dwellers. This study examined people’s relationships to greenspaces in the central business district (CBD) of Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. Liverpool is a rapidly growing hub in outer metropolitan Sydney, where provision of greenspaces is generally acknowledged as inadequate. Space for plants is limited in city CBDs and these environments are especially challenging places to green, meaning that the quality of vegetation available for users is also often limited. Here, we report on an online survey conducted over the summer of 2019–2020, coinciding with the catastrophic Australian ‘black summer’ bushfires. It explored how people valued, used and experienced existing greenspaces in the CBD. Quantitative and qualitative results from 196 respondents illustrate that although most people agree on the benefits of greenspace, value it positively and use it regularly, three persistent concerns mediate their experiences: lack of shade, poor maintenance, and poor facilities. Further, and in addition to within space variation, experiences of greenspaces are negatively influenced by distance travelled and other barriers to what might otherwise be quality spaces. As the urban environment of Liverpool’s CBD undergoes rapid transformation to a higher activity (business/retail/services) and denser residential environment, there is an opportunity to translate the differences between values and experiences illustrated here to improve the design and quality of future greenspace. More broadly, this study indicates why the spatial dimensions of people’s relationships to urban nature requires more explicit and critical consideration within experience research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 105175"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001749/pdfft?md5=d4e52c03731ae48d0905e9960db78753&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001749-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valuing nature through attention to urban greening offers some remedy to ‘Extinction of Experience’ – the decline in diversity and quality of people’s relationships to nature. Unfortunately, while the role and value of greenspaces are increasingly recognised, recognition and valuing does not always translate into beneficial experiences for urban dwellers. This study examined people’s relationships to greenspaces in the central business district (CBD) of Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. Liverpool is a rapidly growing hub in outer metropolitan Sydney, where provision of greenspaces is generally acknowledged as inadequate. Space for plants is limited in city CBDs and these environments are especially challenging places to green, meaning that the quality of vegetation available for users is also often limited. Here, we report on an online survey conducted over the summer of 2019–2020, coinciding with the catastrophic Australian ‘black summer’ bushfires. It explored how people valued, used and experienced existing greenspaces in the CBD. Quantitative and qualitative results from 196 respondents illustrate that although most people agree on the benefits of greenspace, value it positively and use it regularly, three persistent concerns mediate their experiences: lack of shade, poor maintenance, and poor facilities. Further, and in addition to within space variation, experiences of greenspaces are negatively influenced by distance travelled and other barriers to what might otherwise be quality spaces. As the urban environment of Liverpool’s CBD undergoes rapid transformation to a higher activity (business/retail/services) and denser residential environment, there is an opportunity to translate the differences between values and experiences illustrated here to improve the design and quality of future greenspace. More broadly, this study indicates why the spatial dimensions of people’s relationships to urban nature requires more explicit and critical consideration within experience research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价值广泛但体验不同;了解与中央商务区绿地的关系
通过关注城市绿化来重视自然,可以在一定程度上解决 "体验灭绝 "问题--即人们与自然关系的多样性和质量下降。遗憾的是,虽然绿地的作用和价值日益得到认可,但认可和重视并不总能转化为城市居民的有益体验。本研究考察了澳大利亚新南威尔士州利物浦中央商务区(CBD)人们与绿地的关系。利物浦是悉尼大都市外围一个快速发展的中心,人们普遍认为这里的绿地不足。城市中央商务区的植物空间有限,而且这些环境的绿化尤其具有挑战性,这意味着可供用户使用的植被质量也往往有限。在此,我们报告了 2019-2020 年夏季开展的一项在线调查,当时正值澳大利亚发生灾难性的 "黑色夏季 "丛林大火。调查探讨了人们如何重视、使用和体验中央商务区的现有绿地。来自 196 名受访者的定量和定性结果表明,尽管大多数人都认同绿地的益处,积极重视绿地并经常使用绿地,但有三个持续存在的问题影响了他们的体验:缺乏遮荫、维护不善和设施简陋。此外,除了空间内部的差异外,绿地体验还受到距离和其他障碍的负面影响,否则这些空间可能是优质的。随着利物浦中央商务区的城市环境迅速向高活动性(商业/零售/服务业)和高密度居住环境转变,我们有机会将本文所展示的价值和体验之间的差异转化为未来绿地设计和质量的改进。更广泛地说,本研究表明了为什么人们与城市自然关系的空间维度需要在体验研究中进行更明确、更关键的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Integrated assessment of urban green infrastructure multifunctionality: Insights from Stavanger Landscapes of thermal inequality: Exploring patterns of climate justice across multiple spatial scales in Spain “I like seeing people, different cultures, and hearing different music”: Exploring adolescent perspectives of inclusive and healthy high-rise and dense urban environment designs Multi-species ecological network based on asymmetric movement: Application in an urban rural fringe Narratives of exclusion: A photovoice study towards racial equity and justice in public urban greenspaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1