ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use During Pregnancy: Data from the ESC Registry Of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC)

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.004
{"title":"ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use During Pregnancy: Data from the ESC Registry Of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are not recommended during the second and third trimester because of the significant risk of congenital anomalies associated with their use. However, data are scarce, especially regarding their use in the first trimester and about the impact of stopping just before pregnancy. Our study illustrates the profile of the women who used ACE-Is or ARBs during pregnancy and evaluates the impact on perinatal outcomes. The Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease is a prospective, global registry of pregnancies in women with structural heart disease. Outcomes were compared between women who used ACE-Is or ARBs and those who did not. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of ACE-I or ARB use on the occurrence of congenital anomalies. ACE-Is (n = 35) and/or ARBs (n = 8) were used in 42 (0.7%) of the 5,739 Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease pregnancies. Women who used ACE-Is or ARBs more often came from a low-or-middle-income country (57% vs 40%, p = 0.021), had chronic hypertension (31% vs 6%, p &lt;0.001), or a left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40% (33% vs 4%, p &lt;0.001). In the multivariable analysis, ACE-I use during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomaly (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 9.6). Therefore, ACE-Is should be avoided during pregnancy, also in the first trimester, because of a higher risk of congenital anomalies. However, there is no need to stop long before pregnancy. Preconception counseling is crucial to discuss the potential risks of these medications, to evaluate the clinical condition and, if possible, to change or stop the medication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005794/pdfft?md5=d83aa24231d87250d2277a5ea436a186&pid=1-s2.0-S0002914924005794-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005794","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are not recommended during the second and third trimester because of the significant risk of congenital anomalies associated with their use. However, data are scarce, especially regarding their use in the first trimester and about the impact of stopping just before pregnancy. Our study illustrates the profile of the women who used ACE-Is or ARBs during pregnancy and evaluates the impact on perinatal outcomes. The Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease is a prospective, global registry of pregnancies in women with structural heart disease. Outcomes were compared between women who used ACE-Is or ARBs and those who did not. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of ACE-I or ARB use on the occurrence of congenital anomalies. ACE-Is (n = 35) and/or ARBs (n = 8) were used in 42 (0.7%) of the 5,739 Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease pregnancies. Women who used ACE-Is or ARBs more often came from a low-or-middle-income country (57% vs 40%, p = 0.021), had chronic hypertension (31% vs 6%, p <0.001), or a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (33% vs 4%, p <0.001). In the multivariable analysis, ACE-I use during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomaly (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 9.6). Therefore, ACE-Is should be avoided during pregnancy, also in the first trimester, because of a higher risk of congenital anomalies. However, there is no need to stop long before pregnancy. Preconception counseling is crucial to discuss the potential risks of these medications, to evaluate the clinical condition and, if possible, to change or stop the medication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期使用 ACE 抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:来自 ESC 妊娠和心脏病登记处 (ROPAC) 的数据。
由于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-Is)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)有导致先天性畸形的重大风险,因此不建议在妊娠第二和第三季度使用。然而,有关在妊娠头三个月使用这些药物以及在怀孕前停止使用这些药物的影响的数据却很少。我们的研究说明了在怀孕期间使用 ACE-Is 或 ARBs 的妇女的概况,并评估了其对围产期结果的影响。妊娠与心脏病登记处(ROPAC)是一项针对患有结构性心脏病的孕妇的前瞻性全球登记处。对使用 ACE-Is 或 ARBs 和未使用 ACE-Is 或 ARBs 的妇女的预后进行了比较。进行了多变量回归分析,以评估使用 ACE-I 或 ARB 对先天性畸形发生率的影响。在5739例ROPAC孕妇中,42例(0.7%)使用了ACE-I(n=35)和/或ARB(n=8)。使用 ACE-Is 或 ARBs 的妇女更多来自低收入或中等收入国家(57% vs 40%,P=0.021),患有慢性高血压(31% vs 6%,P=0.021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Disparities and Trends in Autopsy Rates Among Cardiovascular Disease Decedents in the US, 2011-2020. Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Analysis. Diastolic Stress Echocardiography in Patients with Hypertrophy Cardiomyopathy: Association with Exercise Capacity. Eight-Year Outcomes of Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis. Evaluating patients with chest pain using the recalibrated HEART score and a single high sensitive cardiac troponin measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1