Tirzepatide has demonstrated cardiometabolic benefits in clinical trials, but real-world cardiovascular outcomes among patients without diabetes following acute cardiovascular events or stroke remain understudied. We evaluated clinical outcomes associated with early tirzepatide use after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or ischemic stroke in patients without diabetes. We conducted a retrospective study using the TriNetX Research Network (110 healthcare organizations). Adults ≥18 years and BMI ≥27 kg/m² without diabetes, with AMI or ischemic stroke from June 2022 to November 2025 were included. Patients treated with tirzepatide within 14 days of AMI/stroke were compared with those not receiving tirzepatide. Propensity score matching (1:1) across 28 covariates balanced demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values, yielding 833 patients per cohort. Outcomes were assessed over 2 years and included all-cause emergency room (ER) visit or hospitalization, acute kidney injury (AKI), ischemic stroke, heart-failure hospitalization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). After matching, tirzepatide use was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause ER visit or hospitalization (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.548-0.741), AKI (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.441-0.962), ischemic stroke (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.703-0.947), and heart-failure hospitalization (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.0001-0.383). MACE hazard did not differ significantly (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.814-1.021). In conclusion, early tirzepatide initiation after AMI/stroke in patients without diabetes was associated with fewer hospitalizations and reduced renal, heart-failure, and stroke events. These findings support prospective trials of tirzepatide for secondary cardiovascular prevention in non-diabetic patients.
Persistent left atrial appendage thrombus despite anticoagulation is common. Current guidelines advise against PMBV because of perceived thromboembolic risk, leaving surgical mitral valve replacement-an option associated with substantial morbidity-as the primary alternative. However, the procedural risk of PMBV in the setting of left atrial appendage thrombus remains poorly established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this. Of the 2,136 studies identified in the initial search, 17 were included in the analysis, comprising 386 patients undergoing PMBV with LAA thrombus. The rate of stroke or embolic complication was 2.8% (95% CI 1.4% - 5.5%). No stroke or embolic complications occurred in Type Ia thrombus. In conclusion, LAA-confined thrombus (Type 1a) was not associated with embolic events, supporting a morphology-based approach to patient selection and emphasizing the need for prospective data to refine the current guidelines.
None.
Outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) depend on timely revascularization and sustained continuity of specialty care. Although community-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes, the impact of individual-level socioeconomic vulnerability on longitudinal outcomes and healthcare utilization after CLTI revascularization remains unclear. We analyzed 333,173 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CLTI revascularization between 2016 and 2023. Socioeconomic vulnerability was defined by Dual Enrolment (DE) in Medicaid. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The primary clinical outcome was major amputation. A composite endpoint of major amputation or death was analyzed to contextualize overall disease burden. The study period was stratified into pre-COVID (01/2016-03/2020), COVID (03/2020-12/2021), and post-COVID (12/2021-12/2023) phases. Healthcare utilization was compared between DE and Medicare-only patients. Among included patients, 26.2% were DE. DE patients were younger, more frequently female, and had a higher comorbidity burden. The crude cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was higher in DE patients (80.1% vs. 79.7%; unadjusted HR 1.07, 95%CI 1.06-1.08), but this difference was not significant after adjustment (adjusted HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.01). DE patients had higher rates of major amputation (17.8% vs. 12.7%; adjusted HR 1.10, 95%CI 1.07-1.12), with no adjusted differences in repeat revascularization or all-cause mortality. During COVID, DE patients had a higher adjusted risk of the primary outcome (HR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.08), whereas risks were similar pre- and post-pandemic. DE identifies CLTI patients at increased risk of limb loss despite similar adjusted survival, highlighting individual-level barriers to care continuity and the need for targeted strategies to reduce preventable amputations.

