A real-world longitudinal study implementing digital screening and treatment for distress in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The COMPASS-IBD study protocol
Annie S.K. Jones , Sophie Harding , Natasha Seaton , Joanna L. Hudson , Alexa Duff , Abigail Wroe , Harinder Singh , Sam Norton , Federica Picariello , Rona Moss-Morris
{"title":"A real-world longitudinal study implementing digital screening and treatment for distress in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The COMPASS-IBD study protocol","authors":"Annie S.K. Jones , Sophie Harding , Natasha Seaton , Joanna L. Hudson , Alexa Duff , Abigail Wroe , Harinder Singh , Sam Norton , Federica Picariello , Rona Moss-Morris","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Co-morbid anxiety and depression (distress) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) results in poorer outcomes and increased healthcare burden. IBD services require scalable treatment pathways for distress to meet this need. This real-world longitudinal study evaluates the implementation of a new integrated care pathway for distress including: 1) routine mental health screening and 2) therapist-guided, digital CBT tailored to the challenges of living with IBD (compass with adaptations for IBD: COMPASS-IBD) in a UK National Health Service (NHS) large gastroenterology service (∼ 5000 patients).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We describe a mixed-methods, observational, real-world longitudinal study. Routine mental health screening in the IBD service will identify patients with distress (using pre-defined clinical cut-offs), who will be triaged to determine appropriate treatment pathways (including participation in the COMPASS-IBD study). Participants will receive COMPASS-IBD online for ∼12 weeks (including 6 × 30-min therapist sessions). Key implementation outcomes will assess reach and adoption of the new pathway using aggregate data on uptake of mental health screening, eligibility, and consent rates for COMPASS-IBD, and number of COMPASS-IBD sessions completed. Interviews with patients and healthcare providers will primarily assess acceptability of the new pathway. Potential effectiveness will be assessed using participant questionnaires at pre-intervention, 12-weeks (post-intervention), and 6-month follow-up. The primary effectiveness outcome will be pre-post changes in distress (PHQ-ADS scores). Quantitative data will be summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitative data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Study findings will inform treatment pathways for co-morbid distress in IBD, and highlight adaptations required to increase future scalability and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number:</strong> <span><span>NCT05330299</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 107658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002416/pdfft?md5=90a31748b58e58fd29ffe8b4c355785f&pid=1-s2.0-S1551714424002416-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Co-morbid anxiety and depression (distress) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) results in poorer outcomes and increased healthcare burden. IBD services require scalable treatment pathways for distress to meet this need. This real-world longitudinal study evaluates the implementation of a new integrated care pathway for distress including: 1) routine mental health screening and 2) therapist-guided, digital CBT tailored to the challenges of living with IBD (compass with adaptations for IBD: COMPASS-IBD) in a UK National Health Service (NHS) large gastroenterology service (∼ 5000 patients).
Methods
We describe a mixed-methods, observational, real-world longitudinal study. Routine mental health screening in the IBD service will identify patients with distress (using pre-defined clinical cut-offs), who will be triaged to determine appropriate treatment pathways (including participation in the COMPASS-IBD study). Participants will receive COMPASS-IBD online for ∼12 weeks (including 6 × 30-min therapist sessions). Key implementation outcomes will assess reach and adoption of the new pathway using aggregate data on uptake of mental health screening, eligibility, and consent rates for COMPASS-IBD, and number of COMPASS-IBD sessions completed. Interviews with patients and healthcare providers will primarily assess acceptability of the new pathway. Potential effectiveness will be assessed using participant questionnaires at pre-intervention, 12-weeks (post-intervention), and 6-month follow-up. The primary effectiveness outcome will be pre-post changes in distress (PHQ-ADS scores). Quantitative data will be summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitative data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Conclusion
Study findings will inform treatment pathways for co-morbid distress in IBD, and highlight adaptations required to increase future scalability and effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.