Evaluation of Ultrasound Changes With the Use of Microneedling Versus Fractional CO2 Laser in Atrophic Acne Scars.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology practical & conceptual Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.5826/dpc.1403a168
Claudio Ñanco-Meléndez, Mathias Yagnam-Díaz, Marco Muñoz-Cáceres, Javier Contador-González, Walter Gubelin-Harcha, Fernando Chicao-Carmona, Jerry Tan, Ximena Wortsman
{"title":"Evaluation of Ultrasound Changes With the Use of Microneedling Versus Fractional CO2 Laser in Atrophic Acne Scars.","authors":"Claudio Ñanco-Meléndez, Mathias Yagnam-Díaz, Marco Muñoz-Cáceres, Javier Contador-González, Walter Gubelin-Harcha, Fernando Chicao-Carmona, Jerry Tan, Ximena Wortsman","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1403a168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrophic acne scarring, a common sequela of acne, can be treated by different interventions, including microneedling and laser resurfacing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy of microneedling versus fractional CO2 laser in treating atrophic acne facial scars using imaging with high and ultra-high frequency ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants received 2 sessions, separated by 1 month, of microneedling on the left side of the face and fractional CO2 laser on the right. Color Doppler ultrasound evaluations (24 and 70 MHz) were conducted at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Each patient completed questionnaires on satisfaction, pain, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine subjects were enrolled. The frequency order of scar types was boxcar, ice-pick, and rolling. At 3 months, using the acne scar clinical evaluation scale, a decrease in scar scores of both methods was observed for total scars (P = 0.0005), ice-pick scars (P = 0.0128), and rolling scars (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two scars analyzed by ultrasound demonstrated a trend to decrease in size; however, no significant changes were observed for either microneedling or CO2 laser treatments. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these methods. Both treatments were rated as good or very good by patient assessments. There was a low frequency of pain and hyperpigmentation reported with both modalities, albeit somewhat higher with microneedling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both microneedling and CO2 laser improved atrophic acne scars. Ultrasound did not show significant differences between these modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11314431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1403a168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Atrophic acne scarring, a common sequela of acne, can be treated by different interventions, including microneedling and laser resurfacing.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy of microneedling versus fractional CO2 laser in treating atrophic acne facial scars using imaging with high and ultra-high frequency ultrasound.

Methods: Participants received 2 sessions, separated by 1 month, of microneedling on the left side of the face and fractional CO2 laser on the right. Color Doppler ultrasound evaluations (24 and 70 MHz) were conducted at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Each patient completed questionnaires on satisfaction, pain, and adverse effects.

Results: Nine subjects were enrolled. The frequency order of scar types was boxcar, ice-pick, and rolling. At 3 months, using the acne scar clinical evaluation scale, a decrease in scar scores of both methods was observed for total scars (P = 0.0005), ice-pick scars (P = 0.0128), and rolling scars (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two scars analyzed by ultrasound demonstrated a trend to decrease in size; however, no significant changes were observed for either microneedling or CO2 laser treatments. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these methods. Both treatments were rated as good or very good by patient assessments. There was a low frequency of pain and hyperpigmentation reported with both modalities, albeit somewhat higher with microneedling.

Conclusions: Both microneedling and CO2 laser improved atrophic acne scars. Ultrasound did not show significant differences between these modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在萎缩性痤疮疤痕中使用微针疗法与点阵式二氧化碳激光疗法的超声变化评估
导言:萎缩性痤疮瘢痕是痤疮的常见后遗症,可通过不同的干预措施进行治疗,包括微针和激光换肤:我们试图利用高频和超高频超声波成像技术,评估微针疗法与点阵式二氧化碳激光疗法在治疗面部萎缩性痤疮疤痕方面的疗效比较:参试者左侧面部接受微针治疗,右侧面部接受二氧化碳点阵激光治疗,两次治疗相隔 1 个月。在基线和治疗后 3 个月分别进行了彩色多普勒超声评估(24 和 70 MHz)。每位患者都填写了有关满意度、疼痛和不良反应的问卷:结果:九名受试者接受了治疗。疤痕类型的频率顺序为箱型、冰锥型和滚动型。3个月后,使用痤疮疤痕临床评估量表,观察到两种方法的疤痕评分均有所下降:总疤痕(P = 0.0005)、冰锥疤痕(P = 0.0128)和滚动疤痕(P = 0.0007)。用超声波分析的 22 个疤痕显示出缩小的趋势;但微针或二氧化碳激光治疗的疤痕都没有明显变化。此外,这两种方法之间也没有明显差异。两种治疗方法都被患者评为 "好 "或 "非常好"。两种方法都很少出现疼痛和色素沉着的情况,但微针疗法的疼痛和色素沉着发生率较高:结论:微针和二氧化碳激光都能改善萎缩性痤疮疤痕。结论:微针疗法和二氧化碳激光疗法都能改善萎缩性痤疮疤痕,超声波疗法在这两种疗法之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
期刊最新文献
Impact of Pemphigus on Sleep Quality: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Case-Control Study. Review - Expert Opinion on Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance in Dermatology. A prospective Real-Life Multicenter Study of Tildrakizumab 200 mg in Patients with Moderate-Severe Psoriasis: Who is the Ideal Patient? Optimized Calcium Hydroxylapatite Formulation and Its Injection Technique for Hand Rejuvenation: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Actinic Keratosis. What is New for The Management for Sun-Damaged Skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1