Impact of different concentration iodinated contrast media on pain and comfort in abdominal computed tomography

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111664
{"title":"Impact of different concentration iodinated contrast media on pain and comfort in abdominal computed tomography","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate whether high concentration iodinated contrast media (CM), compared with low concentration CM, could reduce pain and discomfort levels in patients who had level II and III venous conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had level II and III venous conditions and underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan between July 2021 and February 2022. The venous condition to establish peripheral venous access for CM injection was graded using the Intravenous Access Scoring system, of which level II and III indicated poor venous condition and difficult venous access. Patients received iomeprol 400 in high concentration group and ioversol 320 in low group at an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.12 gI/s. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels. The secondary outcomes included adverse events and image quality. Patients rated pain intensity via Numerical Rating Scale and comfort level via Visual Analogue Scale with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain and discomfort. Quantitative and qualitative image assessment were compared between two groups. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s <em>t</em> test or Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Categorical variables were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> test, χ<sup>2</sup> test for trend or Fisher’s exact test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 206 patients (mean age, 60.13 ± 12.14 years; 81 males) were included with 99 in the high concentration group and 107 in the low concentration group. The high group had significantly lower pain scores (median 1 [IQR: 0–2] vs 2 (IQR 2–4), p &lt; 0.001) and comfort scores (1 [IQR: 0–3] vs 3 [IQR: 2–5], p &lt; 0.001) than the low group. Incidence of CM extravasation did not significantly differ (1.0 % vs 4.5 %, p = 0.214). No hypersensitivity reaction was observed. Qualitative assessment showed higher clarity scores of intrahepatic hepatic artery and portal vein in the high group. Quantitative assessment results were comparable between two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>High concentration iodinated CM could lower pain intensity and improve comfort levels without comprising image quality of CT scan. High concentration CM is a preferable choice in patients with poor venous conditions during contrast-enhanced CT scan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24003802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether high concentration iodinated contrast media (CM), compared with low concentration CM, could reduce pain and discomfort levels in patients who had level II and III venous conditions.

Methods

This prospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had level II and III venous conditions and underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan between July 2021 and February 2022. The venous condition to establish peripheral venous access for CM injection was graded using the Intravenous Access Scoring system, of which level II and III indicated poor venous condition and difficult venous access. Patients received iomeprol 400 in high concentration group and ioversol 320 in low group at an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.12 gI/s. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels. The secondary outcomes included adverse events and image quality. Patients rated pain intensity via Numerical Rating Scale and comfort level via Visual Analogue Scale with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain and discomfort. Quantitative and qualitative image assessment were compared between two groups. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 test, χ2 test for trend or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

A total of 206 patients (mean age, 60.13 ± 12.14 years; 81 males) were included with 99 in the high concentration group and 107 in the low concentration group. The high group had significantly lower pain scores (median 1 [IQR: 0–2] vs 2 (IQR 2–4), p < 0.001) and comfort scores (1 [IQR: 0–3] vs 3 [IQR: 2–5], p < 0.001) than the low group. Incidence of CM extravasation did not significantly differ (1.0 % vs 4.5 %, p = 0.214). No hypersensitivity reaction was observed. Qualitative assessment showed higher clarity scores of intrahepatic hepatic artery and portal vein in the high group. Quantitative assessment results were comparable between two groups.

Conclusion

High concentration iodinated CM could lower pain intensity and improve comfort levels without comprising image quality of CT scan. High concentration CM is a preferable choice in patients with poor venous conditions during contrast-enhanced CT scan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同浓度碘化造影剂对腹部计算机断层扫描中疼痛和舒适度的影响
目的研究高浓度碘化造影剂(CM)与低浓度碘化造影剂相比,能否减轻Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级静脉疾病患者的疼痛和不适程度:这项前瞻性单中心研究招募了在 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 2 月期间接受腹部造影剂增强 CT 扫描的 II 级和 III 级静脉疾病患者。使用静脉通路评分系统对建立中药注射外周静脉通路的静脉条件进行分级,其中II级和III级表示静脉条件差和静脉通路困难。患者在高浓度组和低浓度组分别接受了碘美醇 400 和碘伏 320,碘给药速度相同,均为 1.12 gI/s。主要结果是疼痛和舒适度。次要结果包括不良事件和图像质量。患者通过数字评分量表对疼痛强度进行评分,通过视觉模拟评分量表对舒适度进行评分,得分越高表示疼痛和不适程度越高。两组患者的定量和定性图像评估结果进行了比较。连续变量的比较采用学生 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验。分类变量的比较采用χ2检验、χ2趋势检验或费雪精确检验:共纳入 206 名患者(平均年龄为 60.13 ± 12.14 岁;81 名男性),其中高浓度组 99 人,低浓度组 107 人。高浓度组的疼痛评分明显较低(中位数 1 [IQR: 0-2] vs 2 (IQR 2-4),P 结论:高浓度碘化 CM 可以降低疼痛评分:高浓度碘化 CM 可降低疼痛强度,提高舒适度,且不会影响 CT 扫描的图像质量。高浓度 CM 是造影剂增强 CT 扫描期间静脉条件较差患者的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of radiomics-Based models in distinguishing between ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-Analysis Clinical diagnostic model for predicting indolent or aggressive lymphoma based on clinical information and ultrasound features of superficial lymph nodes Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with variceal embolization reduces rebleeding risk for patients with portal pressure gradient over 12 mmHg: A long-term follow-up study Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: A narrative review of prediction but not association studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1