Trends in heart transplant outcomes for patients over the age of 70 years in the United States: An analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.08.001
Erik J Henricksen, Brian Wayda, Jeffrey J Teuteberg, Helen Luikart, Joyce Njoroge, Brandon A Guenthart, Kiran K Khush
{"title":"Trends in heart transplant outcomes for patients over the age of 70 years in the United States: An analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.","authors":"Erik J Henricksen, Brian Wayda, Jeffrey J Teuteberg, Helen Luikart, Joyce Njoroge, Brandon A Guenthart, Kiran K Khush","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients of advanced age are often considered to be poor candidates for heart transplant (HT). As the U.S. population continues to age, it is important for clinicians to understand how best to select patients for advanced therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2006 to August 2022 in adult recipients. Patients were excluded if they were multiorgan transplant, re-do transplants, or less than 1 year post transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients ≥70 had a 1-year survival of 87.5%, compared to 91.1% for <60%, and 88.4% for 60-69 years (p < 0.001). Survival improved numerically, but not significantly, as transplant eras progressed for those ≥70 years. Survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was greatest at 5 years for <60 years (80.6%), compared to 60-69 years (78.2%) and ≥70 years (77.1%). When comparing 60-69 years to ≥70 years by this same metric, there was significant difference (p = 0.12). One year survival for those ≥70 years has improved from 2000-2009 (80.7%) to 88.5% since October 2018 (p < 0.001). As recipients increased in age, they were more likely to be male, and less likely to be Black or Hispanic/Latino (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, HT outcomes are excellent for carefully selected patients ≥70 years, and transplanting patients in this age cohort can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.08.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients of advanced age are often considered to be poor candidates for heart transplant (HT). As the U.S. population continues to age, it is important for clinicians to understand how best to select patients for advanced therapies.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2006 to August 2022 in adult recipients. Patients were excluded if they were multiorgan transplant, re-do transplants, or less than 1 year post transplant.

Results: Recipients ≥70 had a 1-year survival of 87.5%, compared to 91.1% for <60%, and 88.4% for 60-69 years (p < 0.001). Survival improved numerically, but not significantly, as transplant eras progressed for those ≥70 years. Survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was greatest at 5 years for <60 years (80.6%), compared to 60-69 years (78.2%) and ≥70 years (77.1%). When comparing 60-69 years to ≥70 years by this same metric, there was significant difference (p = 0.12). One year survival for those ≥70 years has improved from 2000-2009 (80.7%) to 88.5% since October 2018 (p < 0.001). As recipients increased in age, they were more likely to be male, and less likely to be Black or Hispanic/Latino (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Overall, HT outcomes are excellent for carefully selected patients ≥70 years, and transplanting patients in this age cohort can be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国 70 岁以上患者心脏移植结果趋势:移植受者科学登记数据库分析》。
背景:高龄患者通常被认为不适合心脏移植(HT)。随着美国人口不断老龄化,临床医生必须了解如何最好地选择患者接受晚期治疗:这是一项对美国移植受者科学登记处 2006 年至 2022 年 8 月成年受者数据的回顾性分析。如果患者是多器官移植、再次移植或移植后不足 1 年,则排除在外:结果:≥70岁的受者一年存活率为87.5%,而≥70岁的受者一年存活率为91.1%:总体而言,经过精心挑选的≥70 岁患者的 HT 结果非常好,可以考虑对这一年龄组的患者进行移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
Long-term air pollution exposure and the risk of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Local intragraft humoral immune responses in chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Trends in heart transplant outcomes for patients over the age of 70 years in the United States: An analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database. Highly sensitized patients listed for heart after liver transplantation with or without domino. Clinical outcomes after a biopsy diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1