Comparison of drug-induced liver injury risk between propylthiouracil and methimazole: A quantitative systems toxicology approach

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Toxicology and applied pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2024.117064
{"title":"Comparison of drug-induced liver injury risk between propylthiouracil and methimazole: A quantitative systems toxicology approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.taap.2024.117064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI), two classical antithyroid agents possess risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with unknown mechanism of action. This study aimed to examine and compare their hepatic toxicity using a quantitative system toxicology approach. The impact of PTU and MMI on hepatocyte survival, oxidative stress, mitochondrial function and bile acid transporters were assessed <em>in vitro</em>. The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of PTU and MMI were constructed while their risk of DILI was calculated by DILIsym, a quantitative systems toxicology (QST) model by integrating the results from <em>in vitro</em> toxicological studies and PBPK models. The simulated DILI (ALT &gt;2 × ULN) incidence for PTU (300 mg/d) was 21.2%, which was within the range observed in clinical practice. Moreover, a threshold dose of 200 mg/d was predicted with oxidative stress proposed as an important toxic mechanism. However, DILIsym predicted a 0% incidence of hepatoxicity caused by MMI (30 mg/d), suggesting that the toxicity of MMI was not mediated through mechanism incorporated into DILIsym. In conclusion, DILIsym appears to be a practical tool to unveil hepatoxicity mechanism and predict clinical risk of DILI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23174,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X2400262X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI), two classical antithyroid agents possess risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with unknown mechanism of action. This study aimed to examine and compare their hepatic toxicity using a quantitative system toxicology approach. The impact of PTU and MMI on hepatocyte survival, oxidative stress, mitochondrial function and bile acid transporters were assessed in vitro. The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of PTU and MMI were constructed while their risk of DILI was calculated by DILIsym, a quantitative systems toxicology (QST) model by integrating the results from in vitro toxicological studies and PBPK models. The simulated DILI (ALT >2 × ULN) incidence for PTU (300 mg/d) was 21.2%, which was within the range observed in clinical practice. Moreover, a threshold dose of 200 mg/d was predicted with oxidative stress proposed as an important toxic mechanism. However, DILIsym predicted a 0% incidence of hepatoxicity caused by MMI (30 mg/d), suggesting that the toxicity of MMI was not mediated through mechanism incorporated into DILIsym. In conclusion, DILIsym appears to be a practical tool to unveil hepatoxicity mechanism and predict clinical risk of DILI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较丙基硫氧嘧啶和甲巯咪唑的药物诱发肝损伤风险:定量系统毒理学方法。
丙基硫氧嘧啶(PTU)和甲巯咪唑(MMI)是两种经典的抗甲状腺药物,具有药物性肝损伤(DILI)的风险,其作用机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在采用定量系统毒理学方法研究和比较这两种药物的肝毒性。在体外评估了 PTU 和 MMI 对肝细胞存活、氧化应激、线粒体功能和胆汁酸转运体的影响。构建了 PTU 和 MMI 的生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型,并通过定量系统毒理学(QST)模型 DILIsym 计算了它们的 DILI 风险,该模型综合了体外毒理学研究和 PBPK 模型的结果。PTU(300 毫克/天)的模拟 DILI(ALT >2 × ULN)发生率为 21.2%,在临床实践观察到的范围内。此外,预测的阈值剂量为 200 毫克/天,氧化应激被认为是一个重要的毒性机制。然而,DILIsym 预测的 MMI(30 毫克/天)引起的肝中毒发生率为 0%,这表明 MMI 的毒性不是通过 DILIsym 中的机制介导的。总之,DILIsym 似乎是揭示肝毒性机制和预测 DILI 临床风险的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
309
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology publishes original scientific research of relevance to animals or humans pertaining to the action of chemicals, drugs, or chemically-defined natural products. Regular articles address mechanistic approaches to physiological, pharmacologic, biochemical, cellular, or molecular understanding of toxicologic/pathologic lesions and to methods used to describe these responses. Safety Science articles address outstanding state-of-the-art preclinical and human translational characterization of drug and chemical safety employing cutting-edge science. Highly significant Regulatory Safety Science articles will also be considered in this category. Papers concerned with alternatives to the use of experimental animals are encouraged. Short articles report on high impact studies of broad interest to readers of TAAP that would benefit from rapid publication. These articles should contain no more than a combined total of four figures and tables. Authors should include in their cover letter the justification for consideration of their manuscript as a short article.
期刊最新文献
Human trophoblast organoids for improved prediction of placental ABC transporter-mediated drug transport Hesperidin attenuates radiation-induced ovarian failure in rats: Emphasis on TLR-4/NF-ĸB signaling pathway Protective effects of alpinetin against interleukin-1β-exposed nucleus pulposus cells: Involvement of the TLR4/MyD88 pathway in a cellular model of intervertebral disc degeneration Strengths and limitations of the worm development and activity test (wDAT) as a chemical screening tool for developmental hazards Protective effect of hydroxysafflor yellow a on thioacetamide-induced liver injury and osteopenia in zebrafish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1