Rupestonic acid, a sesquiterpene, has protective properties against liver damage, inflammation, and tumor formation. Despite these known effects, its specific role and mechanism of action in combating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to investigate the anti-HCC effects of rupestonic acid and to identify its potential molecular targets. We employed cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, and flow cytometry assays to assess its impact on cell viability, proliferation, and apoptosis in HCC cell lines. Additionally, target fishing, cellular thermal shift assays (CETSA), ribonucleic acid interference, and Western blot (WB) were employed to identify rupestonic acid's protein targets in HCC cells. Our results showed that rupestonic acid significantly inhibited HCC cell proliferation, induced G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest, and promoted apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. Target engagement studies employing an alkyne-rupestonic acid probe combined with mass spectrometry identified enolase 1 (ENO1) as a direct binding target, with CETSA confirming its destabilization. Furthermore, rupestonic acid inhibited the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/Forkhead box protein O (FOXO) signaling pathway, and rupestonic acid demonstrated a synergistic cytotoxic effect with paclitaxel (PTX). These findings suggest that rupestonic acid is a promising candidate for HCC treatment. They also underscore the potential of rupestonic acid in the design and development of lead compounds for HCC treatment and identify ENO1 as a viable therapeutic target.
2-Isopropyl-N-2,3-trimethylbutyramide (ITB) is a food-flavoring agent classified as an aliphatic amide. In 2016, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives evaluated ITB and concluded that additional data on toxicity and in vivo genotoxicity are required for its safety evaluation. In this study, we comprehensively investigated ITB toxicity using reporter gene transgenic animals. Male F344 gpt delta rats were administered ITB by oral gavage at doses of 0, 5, 50, or 500 mg/kg/day for 13 weeks. Neurological symptoms were observed in the early phase of treatment at doses ≥50 mg/kg. Periportal hepatocellular vacuolation was observed histopathologically at doses ≥50 mg/kg, along with increased liver weight and serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Kidney weight increased and serum chloride levels decreased at doses ≥5 mg/kg, indicating that ITB exerted potential nephrotoxic effects at lower doses. Accordingly, the lowest observed adverse effect level in the present study was at 5 mg/kg/day. No significant changes in gpt and red/gam mutant frequencies were detected in the liver or kidney, demonstrating a lack of ITB genotoxicity. Immunohistochemical analysis of GST-P-positive foci also suggested that ITB showed no hepatocarcinogenic potential. Overall, our findings demonstrate that ITB induces hepatic and renal toxicity but shows no evidence of in vivo genotoxicity or hepatocarcinogenic potential, providing essential information for safety assessment.
Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that has been widely used to treat major depression; however, it has also been associated with severe neuropsychiatric side effects, including hallucinations, confusion, and suicide attempts. Nevertheless, the electrophysiological mechanisms underlying these adverse effects remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of duloxetine on cloned neuronal rat voltage-gated K+ (Kv) channel subunit Kv3.1, stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Duloxetine inhibited the Kv3.1 current in a concentration-dependent manner with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 2.04 ± 0.27 μM (approximately 5-fold higher than the peak therapeutic plasma concentration of 0.4 μM) and a Hill coefficient of 0.94 ± 0.08. This inhibitory effect was associated with accelerated current inactivation. The association and dissociation rate constants for duloxetine were 43.43 ± 4.57 μM-1·s-1 and 122.12 ± 68.2 s-1, respectively. In addition, duloxetine shifted the voltage dependence of Kv3.1 steady-state inactivation toward a more negative direction and led to use-dependent inhibition upon repetitive stimulation (1 and 2 Hz). Duloxetine also slowed recovery from inactivation. Docking analysis predicted that duloxetine binds to the central pore and interface between the voltage-sensing and pore domains on Kv3.1 channel, supporting the inhibitory mechanisms of duloxetine. Furthermore, duloxetine inhibited Kv3.1-mediated currents in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Taken together, our results indicate that duloxetine inhibits Kv3.1 expressed in CHO cells in concentration-, time-, and use (open and inactivated states)-dependent manners, independently of its anti-depressive effects.

