From othering to belonging: a framework for DEI history-telling and strategising.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2023-012656
April Edwell, Jennifer Edwell
{"title":"From othering to belonging: a framework for DEI history-telling and strategising.","authors":"April Edwell, Jennifer Edwell","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medical profession in the USA is-and has long been-a segregated workforce. Currently, just 5.0% of all US physicians are black. Understanding the origins and mechanisms of this disparity is essential to creating a future where black healing and healers are supported by our medical system. In pursuit of this future, this article offers 'othering' and 'belonging' as frames of analysis and intervention for diversity and equity initiatives.Building on previous historical studies of racism in medicine, this project reveals how the figure of the 'American physician' was created through exclusionary/othering tactics. In part 1, we analyse antebellum historical sources to demonstrate the role of medicine in creating and promulgating racial categories and hierarchies. Next, in part 2, we explore the historical conditions that produced the American physician as a significant professional identity by analysing texts by the American Medical Association and affiliated state medical societies. Then, we turn towards solutions in part 3. To redress inequities produced by othering, particularly the continued exclusion of black people from the medical profession, we argue that medical leaders should cultivate a professional culture of belonging. As we will explain, belonging goes beyond tolerating and respecting difference; it entails shared culture, equal rights and inclusive structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":"755-763"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medical profession in the USA is-and has long been-a segregated workforce. Currently, just 5.0% of all US physicians are black. Understanding the origins and mechanisms of this disparity is essential to creating a future where black healing and healers are supported by our medical system. In pursuit of this future, this article offers 'othering' and 'belonging' as frames of analysis and intervention for diversity and equity initiatives.Building on previous historical studies of racism in medicine, this project reveals how the figure of the 'American physician' was created through exclusionary/othering tactics. In part 1, we analyse antebellum historical sources to demonstrate the role of medicine in creating and promulgating racial categories and hierarchies. Next, in part 2, we explore the historical conditions that produced the American physician as a significant professional identity by analysing texts by the American Medical Association and affiliated state medical societies. Then, we turn towards solutions in part 3. To redress inequities produced by othering, particularly the continued exclusion of black people from the medical profession, we argue that medical leaders should cultivate a professional culture of belonging. As we will explain, belonging goes beyond tolerating and respecting difference; it entails shared culture, equal rights and inclusive structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 "他者 "到 "归属":德育国际讲述历史和制定战略的框架。
美国的医疗行业是--而且长期以来一直是--一支种族隔离的队伍。目前,仅有 5.0% 的美国医生是黑人。要创造一个黑人治疗师得到医疗系统支持的未来,了解这种差异的根源和机制至关重要。为了追求这一未来,本文提出了 "他者化 "和 "归属感 "作为分析和干预多元化与公平计划的框架。在以往对医学中的种族主义进行的历史研究的基础上,本项目揭示了 "美国医生 "这一形象是如何通过排斥/他者化策略产生的。在第 1 部分中,我们分析了前内战时期的历史资料,以展示医学在创造和传播种族类别和等级制度方面的作用。接下来,在第 2 部分中,我们将通过分析美国医学协会和附属州医学会的文本,探讨产生美国医生这一重要职业身份的历史条件。然后,我们将在第 3 部分探讨解决方案。为了纠正 "他者化 "造成的不平等,尤其是黑人继续被排斥在医学界之外,我们认为医学界的领导者应该培养一种专业的归属文化。正如我们将解释的那样,归属感不仅仅是容忍和尊重差异,它还包括共同的文化、平等的权利和包容性的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Towards a transformative health humanities approach in teaching the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Will psychology ever 'join hands' with disability studies? Opportunities and challenges in working towards structurally competent and disability-affirmative psychotherapy for energy limiting conditions. Black bodies in phenomenological bioethics: cultural othering, 'Corporeal Uncanny' and ethical quandaries of black nurses in Take My Hand and Small Great Things. "This will keep me happy for weeks": care objects, affect and graphic medicine. Hidden in plain sight: the covering of patients' eyes and a microethics of medical photography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1