Health and social care staff's recognition of elder abuse perpetrated by family members of persons with dementia: a mixed-method study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1177/14034948241261724
Linda Johansson, Jonas Sandberg, Marie Ernsth Bravell, Lena Östlund
{"title":"Health and social care staff's recognition of elder abuse perpetrated by family members of persons with dementia: a mixed-method study.","authors":"Linda Johansson, Jonas Sandberg, Marie Ernsth Bravell, Lena Östlund","doi":"10.1177/14034948241261724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health and social care staff play a significant role in detecting and reporting abuse among persons with dementia. However, they are often left to their own judgements which can lead to elder abuse not being detected or acted on. The aim was to explore what healthcare and social care staff consider elder abuse, and their experience of elder abuse perpetrated by family members of persons with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-method vignette study was conducted in Sweden during the year 2021. In total 39 staff working in dementia care were included. They first answered the Caregiver Scenario Questionnaire and then participated in a group interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An inconsistency was revealed regarding whether a management strategy for behavioural difficulties included in the Caregiver Scenario Questionnaire should be considered an abusive act or not. No participants were able to identify all five abusive behaviour management strategies. Participants described witnessing 101 abusive acts including different types of abuse of a person with dementia, with emotional/psychological abuse and neglect being most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Health and social care staff who work close to older persons are able to detect abuse perpetrated by family members. However, inconsistency in defining abusive acts demonstrates the uncertainty in identifying abuse. This may lead to abuse not being identified, but it also creates feelings of inadequacy among staff.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241261724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health and social care staff play a significant role in detecting and reporting abuse among persons with dementia. However, they are often left to their own judgements which can lead to elder abuse not being detected or acted on. The aim was to explore what healthcare and social care staff consider elder abuse, and their experience of elder abuse perpetrated by family members of persons with dementia.

Methods: This mixed-method vignette study was conducted in Sweden during the year 2021. In total 39 staff working in dementia care were included. They first answered the Caregiver Scenario Questionnaire and then participated in a group interview.

Results: An inconsistency was revealed regarding whether a management strategy for behavioural difficulties included in the Caregiver Scenario Questionnaire should be considered an abusive act or not. No participants were able to identify all five abusive behaviour management strategies. Participants described witnessing 101 abusive acts including different types of abuse of a person with dementia, with emotional/psychological abuse and neglect being most common.

Conclusions: Health and social care staff who work close to older persons are able to detect abuse perpetrated by family members. However, inconsistency in defining abusive acts demonstrates the uncertainty in identifying abuse. This may lead to abuse not being identified, but it also creates feelings of inadequacy among staff.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗和社会护理人员对痴呆症患者家庭成员虐待老人行为的认识:一项混合方法研究。
背景:医疗和社会护理人员在发现和报告痴呆症患者中的虐待行为方面发挥着重要作用。然而,他们往往只能依靠自己的判断,这可能会导致虐待老人行为未被发现或未采取相应行动。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健和社会护理人员对虐待老人行为的看法,以及他们对痴呆症患者家庭成员虐待老人行为的经历:这项采用混合方法的小故事研究于 2021 年在瑞典进行。共有 39 名痴呆症护理人员参与了研究。他们首先回答了护理人员情景调查问卷,然后参加了小组访谈:结果发现,在护理人员情景问卷中包含的行为障碍管理策略是否应被视为虐待行为的问题上存在不一致。没有参与者能够识别所有五种虐待行为管理策略。参与者描述了他们目睹的 101 种虐待行为,包括对痴呆症患者的不同类型的虐待,其中情感/心理虐待和忽视最为常见: 结论:在老年人身边工作的医疗和社会护理人员能够发现家庭成员实施的虐待行为。然而,对虐待行为定义的不一致表明了识别虐待行为的不确定性。这可能会导致虐待行为不被发现,但也会使工作人员产生不足感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring variations in subjective well-being among Norwegian retirees: A growth mixture modelling approach. Perceived social support and symptoms of depression and anxiety in emerging adulthood: A Swedish prospective cohort study. Rural-urban and geographical differences in prognosis of atrial fibrillation in Finland: a nationwide cohort study. Acts of offensive behaviour and risk of disability pension in Danish female eldercare workers: prospective cohort with 11-year register follow-up. Socioeconomic differences in children's victimization to maternal and paternal violence: a register-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1