Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Pharmacogenomics Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1038/s41397-024-00344-z
John H. McDermott, Videha Sharma, Glenda M. Beaman, Jessica Keen, William G. Newman, Paul Wilson, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright
{"title":"Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment","authors":"John H. McDermott, Videha Sharma, Glenda M. Beaman, Jessica Keen, William G. Newman, Paul Wilson, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright","doi":"10.1038/s41397-024-00344-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.","PeriodicalId":54624,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-024-00344-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解全科医生和药剂师对基层医疗机构药物基因检测的偏好:离散选择实验。
英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的药物基因检测历来都是被动的,是在专科环境中针对单一基因与药物的关系进行的。通过离散选择实验,我们旨在确定医疗保健专业人员对在国民健康服务体系的初级保健中发展药物基因检测服务的偏好。代表两个专业群体(全科医生或药剂师)的受访者完成了两个调查版本中的一个,要求他们在出现情绪低落或关节疼痛的情况下选择自己喜欢的药物基因检测服务。235 人的回复被收录其中。与不进行检测相比,所有受访者都更倾向于进行药物基因检测,但也发现了偏好异质性。两个专业群体,尤其是全科医生,对服务设计高度敏感,接受程度因提供的服务而异。这项研究表明,药物基因检测服务的接受程度受服务设计的影响,并强调了在未来的举措中应优先考虑的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacogenomics Journal
Pharmacogenomics Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pharmacogenomics Journal is a print and electronic journal, which is dedicated to the rapid publication of original research on pharmacogenomics and its clinical applications. Key areas of coverage include: Personalized medicine Effects of genetic variability on drug toxicity and efficacy Identification and functional characterization of polymorphisms relevant to drug action Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variations and drug efficacy Integration of new developments in the genome project and proteomics into clinical medicine, pharmacology, and therapeutics Clinical applications of genomic science Identification of novel genomic targets for drug development Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics.
期刊最新文献
The ZNF263/CPT1B axis regulates fatty acid β-oxidation to affect cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma. Cost analysis of CYP2C19 genetic testing in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Effects and interaction of single nucleotide polymorphisms at the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic site: insights from the Rotterdam study into metformin clinical response and dose titration. Clinical and economic outcomes of a pharmacogenomics-enriched comprehensive medication management program in a self-insured employee population Extreme phenotype sampling and next generation sequencing to identify genetic variants associated with tacrolimus in African American kidney transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1