Examining the influence of cigar and cannabis co-marketing on packaging perceptions: An experiment with a sample of US youth

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108126
{"title":"Examining the influence of cigar and cannabis co-marketing on packaging perceptions: An experiment with a sample of US youth","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Cigars are sometimes marketed with cannabis references because they are often used for smoking blunts (i.e., cannabis rolled in cigar paper with or without tobacco). However, little research exists on the impact of cannabis co-marketing on cigar perceptions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants included 506 US youth (ages 15–20) recruited April-June 2023 through Qualtrics who reported ever using little cigars or cigarillos (LCCs), past 30-day use of LCCs, or susceptibility to using LCCs. We then conducted a between-subjects experiment, randomizing youth to view one of two cigarillo packages: 1) a package with cannabis co-marketing (i.e., the package included a cannabis-related flavor descriptor and the word “blunt” appeared in the brand name and product label) or 2) a package with no cannabis co-marketing. We assessed the effects of the packaging on perceptions of product ingredients, addictiveness and harm perceptions, product appeal, susceptibility to using the product shown, and purchase intentions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Packages with cannabis co-marketing were perceived as more likely to contain cannabis (<em>OR</em>: 5.56, 95 % CI: 3.73, 8.27) and less likely to contain tobacco (<em>OR</em>: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.25, 0.70) or nicotine (<em>OR</em>: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.82). Cannabis co-marketing also led to higher susceptibility to using the product shown (<em>B</em>: 0.21, <em>p</em> = 0.02). We did not find evidence that cannabis co-marketing changed harm perceptions or purchase intentions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among a sample of US youth, cannabis co-marketing on cigar packages may change perceptions of product ingredients and increase susceptibility to using such products, which could lead to the initiation of cigars and cannabis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance

Cigars are sometimes marketed with cannabis references because they are often used for smoking blunts (i.e., cannabis rolled in cigar paper with or without tobacco). However, little research exists on the impact of cannabis co-marketing on cigar perceptions.

Methods

Participants included 506 US youth (ages 15–20) recruited April-June 2023 through Qualtrics who reported ever using little cigars or cigarillos (LCCs), past 30-day use of LCCs, or susceptibility to using LCCs. We then conducted a between-subjects experiment, randomizing youth to view one of two cigarillo packages: 1) a package with cannabis co-marketing (i.e., the package included a cannabis-related flavor descriptor and the word “blunt” appeared in the brand name and product label) or 2) a package with no cannabis co-marketing. We assessed the effects of the packaging on perceptions of product ingredients, addictiveness and harm perceptions, product appeal, susceptibility to using the product shown, and purchase intentions.

Results

Packages with cannabis co-marketing were perceived as more likely to contain cannabis (OR: 5.56, 95 % CI: 3.73, 8.27) and less likely to contain tobacco (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.25, 0.70) or nicotine (OR: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.82). Cannabis co-marketing also led to higher susceptibility to using the product shown (B: 0.21, p = 0.02). We did not find evidence that cannabis co-marketing changed harm perceptions or purchase intentions.

Conclusions

Among a sample of US youth, cannabis co-marketing on cigar packages may change perceptions of product ingredients and increase susceptibility to using such products, which could lead to the initiation of cigars and cannabis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究雪茄和大麻联合营销对包装认知的影响:以美国青少年为样本的实验。
意义:雪茄有时在销售时会提及大麻,因为雪茄通常用于吸食钝烟头(即用雪茄纸卷着大麻,或不卷烟草)。然而,关于大麻联合营销对雪茄认知的影响的研究却很少:参与者包括 2023 年 4 月至 6 月通过 Qualtrics 招募的 506 名美国青少年(15-20 岁),他们表示曾经使用过小雪茄或雪茄烟(LCC),在过去 30 天内使用过 LCC,或容易使用 LCC。然后,我们进行了一次主体间实验,随机让青少年观看两种雪茄烟包装中的一种:1)有大麻联合营销的包装(即包装上有大麻相关的味道描述,品牌名称和产品标签上有 "钝 "字);或 2)没有大麻联合营销的包装。我们评估了包装对产品成分认知、成瘾性和危害认知、产品吸引力、使用所示产品的可能性以及购买意向的影响:大麻联合营销的包装被认为更有可能含有大麻(OR:5.56,95 % CI:3.73,8.27),而含有烟草(OR:0.42,95 % CI:0.25,0.70)或尼古丁(OR:0.57,95 % CI:0.40,0.82)的可能性较低。大麻联合营销也导致更容易使用所示产品(B:0.21,P = 0.02)。我们没有发现证据表明大麻联合营销改变了危害认知或购买意向:结论:在美国青少年样本中,雪茄包装上的大麻联合营销可能会改变对产品成分的认知,增加使用此类产品的易感性,从而导致开始吸食雪茄和大麻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Exposure to Bupropion-SR vs. Placebo is associated with reductions in smoking among persons receiving methadone with no stated interest in smoking cessation The transition from cigarette smoking to the exclusive or partial use of e-cigarettes: A multi-stage mixed methods study among French university students Preventing the transitions in poly-tobacco use among young adults: A latent transition analysis of a smoking reduction intervention trial Cannabis use and associated longitudinal transitions in electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young adults in the United States A novel smoking cessation behavior based on quit attempts may identify new genes associated with long-term abstinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1