The clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula in determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adults: A retrospective study
Eva De Lange , Kurt Boeykens , Dimitri Beeckman , Tim Torsy
{"title":"The clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula in determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adults: A retrospective study","authors":"Eva De Lange , Kurt Boeykens , Dimitri Beeckman , Tim Torsy","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Accurate determination of the internal length of nasogastric tubes is essential for the safe and effective completion of blind insertions, a routine nursing procedure. The widely used nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance lacks evidence and effectiveness. A recent randomized controlled trial proposed an alternative, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula. However, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been studied.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the internal nasogastric tube length in adult patients admitted to hospitalization or intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-center retrospective clinical effectiveness study was conducted, utilizing routinely collected observational data.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and main outcome measures</h3><p>Between October 2020 and November 2022, 358 adult patients in a general hospital requiring a nasogastric feeding tube were included. The primary outcome involved assessing nasogastric tube tip positioning (>3 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter) by an advanced practice nurse through X-ray verification. Secondary outcomes, obtained from patient records for a random subgroup of 100 participants, were reporting clarity and evaluation of the tip position by reviewing radiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following evaluation by an advanced practice nurse, all nasogastric feeding tubes were determined to be correctly positioned. Among the subgroup of 100 tubes, X-ray protocols, as documented by the reviewing radiologists, showed varying levels of reporting clarity for the tube tip: 4.0 % lacked reporting, 33.0 % had ambiguous reporting and 63.0 % had unambiguous reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula demonstrates potential to emerge as a safer alternative to existing methods for determining the internal length of nasogastric tubes.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>In addition to healthcare provider education and training, a checklist-based framework is recommended for radiologists to unambiguously report nasogastric tube tip positions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096433972400168X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Accurate determination of the internal length of nasogastric tubes is essential for the safe and effective completion of blind insertions, a routine nursing procedure. The widely used nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance lacks evidence and effectiveness. A recent randomized controlled trial proposed an alternative, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula. However, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been studied.
Objective
This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the internal nasogastric tube length in adult patients admitted to hospitalization or intensive care units.
Design
A single-center retrospective clinical effectiveness study was conducted, utilizing routinely collected observational data.
Setting and main outcome measures
Between October 2020 and November 2022, 358 adult patients in a general hospital requiring a nasogastric feeding tube were included. The primary outcome involved assessing nasogastric tube tip positioning (>3 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter) by an advanced practice nurse through X-ray verification. Secondary outcomes, obtained from patient records for a random subgroup of 100 participants, were reporting clarity and evaluation of the tip position by reviewing radiologists.
Results
Following evaluation by an advanced practice nurse, all nasogastric feeding tubes were determined to be correctly positioned. Among the subgroup of 100 tubes, X-ray protocols, as documented by the reviewing radiologists, showed varying levels of reporting clarity for the tube tip: 4.0 % lacked reporting, 33.0 % had ambiguous reporting and 63.0 % had unambiguous reporting.
Conclusion
The corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula demonstrates potential to emerge as a safer alternative to existing methods for determining the internal length of nasogastric tubes.
Implications for clinical practice
In addition to healthcare provider education and training, a checklist-based framework is recommended for radiologists to unambiguously report nasogastric tube tip positions.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.