The clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula in determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adults: A retrospective study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103783
Eva De Lange , Kurt Boeykens , Dimitri Beeckman , Tim Torsy
{"title":"The clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula in determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adults: A retrospective study","authors":"Eva De Lange ,&nbsp;Kurt Boeykens ,&nbsp;Dimitri Beeckman ,&nbsp;Tim Torsy","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Accurate determination of the internal length of nasogastric tubes is essential for the safe and effective completion of blind insertions, a routine nursing procedure. The widely used nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance lacks evidence and effectiveness. A recent randomized controlled trial proposed an alternative, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula. However, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been studied.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the internal nasogastric tube length in adult patients admitted to hospitalization or intensive care units.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-center retrospective clinical effectiveness study was conducted, utilizing routinely collected observational data.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and main outcome measures</h3><p>Between October 2020 and November 2022, 358 adult patients in a general hospital requiring a nasogastric feeding tube were included. The primary outcome involved assessing nasogastric tube tip positioning (&gt;3 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter) by an advanced practice nurse through X-ray verification. Secondary outcomes, obtained from patient records for a random subgroup of 100 participants, were reporting clarity and evaluation of the tip position by reviewing radiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following evaluation by an advanced practice nurse, all nasogastric feeding tubes were determined to be correctly positioned. Among the subgroup of 100 tubes, X-ray protocols, as documented by the reviewing radiologists, showed varying levels of reporting clarity for the tube tip: 4.0 % lacked reporting, 33.0 % had ambiguous reporting and 63.0 % had unambiguous reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula demonstrates potential to emerge as a safer alternative to existing methods for determining the internal length of nasogastric tubes.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>In addition to healthcare provider education and training, a checklist-based framework is recommended for radiologists to unambiguously report nasogastric tube tip positions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096433972400168X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate determination of the internal length of nasogastric tubes is essential for the safe and effective completion of blind insertions, a routine nursing procedure. The widely used nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance lacks evidence and effectiveness. A recent randomized controlled trial proposed an alternative, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula. However, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been studied.

Objective

This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the internal nasogastric tube length in adult patients admitted to hospitalization or intensive care units.

Design

A single-center retrospective clinical effectiveness study was conducted, utilizing routinely collected observational data.

Setting and main outcome measures

Between October 2020 and November 2022, 358 adult patients in a general hospital requiring a nasogastric feeding tube were included. The primary outcome involved assessing nasogastric tube tip positioning (>3 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter) by an advanced practice nurse through X-ray verification. Secondary outcomes, obtained from patient records for a random subgroup of 100 participants, were reporting clarity and evaluation of the tip position by reviewing radiologists.

Results

Following evaluation by an advanced practice nurse, all nasogastric feeding tubes were determined to be correctly positioned. Among the subgroup of 100 tubes, X-ray protocols, as documented by the reviewing radiologists, showed varying levels of reporting clarity for the tube tip: 4.0 % lacked reporting, 33.0 % had ambiguous reporting and 63.0 % had unambiguous reporting.

Conclusion

The corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula demonstrates potential to emerge as a safer alternative to existing methods for determining the internal length of nasogastric tubes.

Implications for clinical practice

In addition to healthcare provider education and training, a checklist-based framework is recommended for radiologists to unambiguously report nasogastric tube tip positions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校正鼻-耳垂-剑突距离公式在确定成人鼻胃管内部长度方面的临床效果:回顾性研究。
介绍:准确测定鼻胃管的内部长度对于安全有效地完成盲插这一常规护理程序至关重要。广泛使用的鼻-耳垂-剑突距离缺乏证据和有效性。最近的一项随机对照试验提出了一种替代方法,即校正鼻-耳垂-剑突距离公式。然而,该公式在实际临床实践中的有效性尚未得到研究:本研究评估了校正鼻-耳垂-剑突距离公式在确定住院或重症监护室成人患者鼻胃管内口长度时的实际临床效果:设计:利用常规收集的观察数据,进行单中心回顾性临床有效性研究:在 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 11 月期间,纳入了 358 名需要鼻胃喂养管的综合医院成人患者。主要结果包括由一名高级执业护士通过 X 光检查评估鼻胃管尖端定位(低于食管下括约肌 3 厘米)。次要结果来自随机分组的 100 名参与者的患者记录,包括报告的清晰度和放射科医生对尖端位置的评估:结果:经过高级执业护士的评估,所有鼻胃喂养管的位置都被确定为正确。在 100 例输液管子组中,放射科复查医生记录的 X 光方案显示,输液管尖端的报告清晰度各不相同:4.0% 缺乏报告,33.0% 报告不明确,63.0% 报告不明确:结论:经校正的鼻-耳垂-剑突距离公式有可能成为确定鼻胃管内部长度的现有方法之外的一种更安全的替代方法:除了对医护人员进行教育和培训外,建议放射科医生采用基于核对表的框架,以明确报告鼻胃管尖端位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal trajectories of health-related quality of life among critical care survivors: A latent class growth approach Prevalence and risk factors for burnout, missed nursing care, and intention-to-leave the job among intensive care unit and general ward nurses: A cross-sectional study across six European countries in the COVID-19 era Sociodemographic representation in ICU recovery research “I will get out of this” - The patients’ experiences of early mobilisation in intensive care. A hermeneutic study Flexible ICU visiting: Improving family outcomes while navigating implementation challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1