Development, Progression, and Mortality of Suspected Interstitial Lung Disease in COPDGene.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1164/rccm.202402-0313OC
Jonathan A Rose, Ann-Marcia C Tukpah, Claire Cutting, Noriaki Wada, Mizuki Nishino, Matthew Moll, Sean Kalra, Bina Choi, David A Lynch, Benjamin A Raby, Ivan O Rosas, Raúl San José Estépar, George R Washko, Edwin K Silverman, Michael H Cho, Hiroto Hatabu, Rachel K Putman, Gary M Hunninghake
{"title":"Development, Progression, and Mortality of Suspected Interstitial Lung Disease in COPDGene.","authors":"Jonathan A Rose, Ann-Marcia C Tukpah, Claire Cutting, Noriaki Wada, Mizuki Nishino, Matthew Moll, Sean Kalra, Bina Choi, David A Lynch, Benjamin A Raby, Ivan O Rosas, Raúl San José Estépar, George R Washko, Edwin K Silverman, Michael H Cho, Hiroto Hatabu, Rachel K Putman, Gary M Hunninghake","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202402-0313OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Some with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) have suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD), a subgroup with adverse outcomes. Rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and their effect on mortality are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and assess effects of individual ILD and progression criteria on mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from COPDGene were included. ILD was defined as ILA and fibrosis and/or FVC <80% predicted. Prevalent ILD was assessed at enrollment, incident ILD and progression at 5-year follow-up. CT progression was assessed visually and FVC decline as relative change. Multivariable Cox regression tested associations between mortality and ILD groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9,588 participants at enrollment, 267 (2.8%) had prevalent ILD. Those with prevalent ILD had 52% mortality after median 10.6 years, which was higher than ILA (33%; HR=2.0; p<0.001). The subgroup of prevalent ILD with fibrosis only had worse mortality (59%) than ILA (HR=2.2; p<0.001). 97 participants with prevalent ILD completed 5-year follow-up: 32% had stable CT and relative FVC decline <10%, 6% FVC decline ≥10% only, 39% CT progression only, and 22% both CT progression and FVC decline ≥10%. Mortality rates were 32%, 50%, 45%, and 46% respectively; those with CT progression only had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.6; p=0.005). At 5-year follow-up, incident ILD occurred in 168/4,843 participants without prevalent ILD and had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.5; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of mortality and progression are high among those with suspected ILD in COPDGene; fibrosis and radiologic progression are important predictors of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202402-0313OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Some with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) have suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD), a subgroup with adverse outcomes. Rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and their effect on mortality are unknown.

Objectives: To determine rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and assess effects of individual ILD and progression criteria on mortality.

Methods: Participants from COPDGene were included. ILD was defined as ILA and fibrosis and/or FVC <80% predicted. Prevalent ILD was assessed at enrollment, incident ILD and progression at 5-year follow-up. CT progression was assessed visually and FVC decline as relative change. Multivariable Cox regression tested associations between mortality and ILD groups.

Results: Of 9,588 participants at enrollment, 267 (2.8%) had prevalent ILD. Those with prevalent ILD had 52% mortality after median 10.6 years, which was higher than ILA (33%; HR=2.0; p<0.001). The subgroup of prevalent ILD with fibrosis only had worse mortality (59%) than ILA (HR=2.2; p<0.001). 97 participants with prevalent ILD completed 5-year follow-up: 32% had stable CT and relative FVC decline <10%, 6% FVC decline ≥10% only, 39% CT progression only, and 22% both CT progression and FVC decline ≥10%. Mortality rates were 32%, 50%, 45%, and 46% respectively; those with CT progression only had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.6; p=0.005). At 5-year follow-up, incident ILD occurred in 168/4,843 participants without prevalent ILD and had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.5; p<0.001).

Conclusion: Rates of mortality and progression are high among those with suspected ILD in COPDGene; fibrosis and radiologic progression are important predictors of mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COPDGene 中疑似间质性肺病的发展、恶化和死亡率。
理由:一些肺间质异常(ILA)患者疑似患有肺间质疾病(ILD),这是一个具有不良后果的亚群体。疑似 ILD 的发生率和进展率及其对死亡率的影响尚不清楚:确定疑似 ILD 的发生率和进展率,评估单个 ILD 和进展标准对死亡率的影响:方法:纳入 COPDGene 的参与者。方法:纳入 COPDGene 的参与者,将 ILD 定义为 ILA 和纤维化和/或 FVC 结果:在 9588 名注册参与者中,267 人(2.8%)患有流行性 ILD。在中位 10.6 年后,ILD 患者的死亡率为 52%,高于 ILA 患者(33%;HR=2.0;p 结论:ILD 患者的死亡率和病情进展率均高于 ILA 患者:COPDGene 中疑似 ILD 患者的死亡率和病情进展率很高;纤维化和放射学进展是预测死亡率的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
期刊最新文献
Balancing Act: Tailoring Ventilation Strategies in Acute Brain Injury. CFTR Modulators for the Treatment of COPD: The Jury Is Still Out! Increased BMP-Responsive Transcription Factors in Distinct Endothelial and Mesenchymal Cells in PAH. Lung Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Severe Acute Brain Injured Patients. Reply to Yang and to Xie and Wang.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1