Prognostic impact of histological subtyping in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract

The impact of special histological types (ST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its association with overall outcome has gained increasing relevance as survival has been linked to specific histological TNBC subtypes. We evaluated the clinicopathological and survival data of 598 patients with 613 TNBCs, including 464 TNBCs of no special type (NST) and 149 TNBCs ST (low-grade, n = 12, 8.1%; high-grade, n = 112, 75.2%; apocrine and androgen receptor-positive [APO AR], n = 25, 16.8%). Patients with low-grade TNBC ST and TNBC ST APO AR were significantly older (P < 0.001) and had a lower Ki67 index (P < 0.001) than those with TNBC NST. Patients with high-grade TNBC ST were significantly older (P = 0.006) and had poorer pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (P < 0.001) than those with TNBC NST. Significant survival differences were observed between low-grade TNBC ST, TNBC ST APO AR, high-grade TNBC ST, and TNBC NST in the entire study group (DFS, P = 0.002; DDFS, P = 0.001) and in the non-NAC subgroup (OS, P = 0.034; DFS, P = 0.001; DDFS, P < 0.001). Patients with low-grade TNBC ST had the best survival outcomes. Patients with high-grade TNBC ST showed significantly worse outcomes than those with TNBC NST (entire study group: OS, P = 0.049; DFS, P < 0.001; DDFS, P = 0.001; non-NAC subgroup: OS, P = 0.014; DFS, P < 0.001; DDFS, P < 0.001). We conclude that prognostic stratification of TNBC ST is ultimately important for optimizing the therapeutic management of patients with these rare tumor entities.