Oral health self-perception, maximum bite force and masticatory efficiency in patients with overdentures with different attachment systems—A crossover study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1111/joor.13825
Amanda Laísa de Oliveira Lima, Camila Luiz Jabr, Cibele Oliveira de Melo Rocha, Lucas Portela Oliveira, Rafael Antonio de Oliveira Ribeiro, Francisco de Assis Mollo Júnior, João Neudenir Arioli Filho
{"title":"Oral health self-perception, maximum bite force and masticatory efficiency in patients with overdentures with different attachment systems—A crossover study","authors":"Amanda Laísa de Oliveira Lima,&nbsp;Camila Luiz Jabr,&nbsp;Cibele Oliveira de Melo Rocha,&nbsp;Lucas Portela Oliveira,&nbsp;Rafael Antonio de Oliveira Ribeiro,&nbsp;Francisco de Assis Mollo Júnior,&nbsp;João Neudenir Arioli Filho","doi":"10.1111/joor.13825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The literature is unclear about how the different attachment systems for overdentures impact the maximum bite force, the masticatory efficiency and how this impact in the oral health self-perception in patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the effect of two attachment systems (O-ring and Locator) for mandibular overdenture using single implant on quality of life, maximum bite force (BF) and masticatory efficiency (ME).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight completely edentulous denture wearers with a mandibular symphysis implant were randomly selected and allocated into two groups in a crossover study, considering O-ring and Locator attachment types. The quality of life and self-perception of oral health were assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Edent) and Geriatric Index of Determination of Oral Health (GOHAI) questionnaires, respectively. BF was measured using a gnathodynamometer and ME by chewing silicone cubes and almonds in different numbers of cycles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no difference between the attachment systems about self-perceived oral health and impact on quality of life (<i>p</i> &gt; .05). The O-ring-type system obtained a significantly higher BF than the locator-type system (<i>p</i> = .04). Regardless of the food chewed, no statistically significant difference was observed with the type of attachment (<i>p</i> &gt; .05). The ME was directly proportional to the masticatory cycles only for almonds (<i>p</i> &lt; .01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Locator and O-ring inserts had a similar impact on patients' quality of life, self-perception of oral health and ME. Additionally, the O-ring system exhibited superior properties in the BF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"51 11","pages":"2354-2360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The literature is unclear about how the different attachment systems for overdentures impact the maximum bite force, the masticatory efficiency and how this impact in the oral health self-perception in patients.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of two attachment systems (O-ring and Locator) for mandibular overdenture using single implant on quality of life, maximum bite force (BF) and masticatory efficiency (ME).

Methods

Twenty-eight completely edentulous denture wearers with a mandibular symphysis implant were randomly selected and allocated into two groups in a crossover study, considering O-ring and Locator attachment types. The quality of life and self-perception of oral health were assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Edent) and Geriatric Index of Determination of Oral Health (GOHAI) questionnaires, respectively. BF was measured using a gnathodynamometer and ME by chewing silicone cubes and almonds in different numbers of cycles.

Results

There was no difference between the attachment systems about self-perceived oral health and impact on quality of life (p > .05). The O-ring-type system obtained a significantly higher BF than the locator-type system (p = .04). Regardless of the food chewed, no statistically significant difference was observed with the type of attachment (p > .05). The ME was directly proportional to the masticatory cycles only for almonds (p < .01).

Conclusions

Locator and O-ring inserts had a similar impact on patients' quality of life, self-perception of oral health and ME. Additionally, the O-ring system exhibited superior properties in the BF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同连接系统的覆盖义齿患者的口腔健康自我感知、最大咬合力和咀嚼效率--一项交叉研究。
背景:关于不同的覆盖义齿连接系统如何影响最大咬合力和咀嚼效率,以及如何影响患者的口腔健康自我感觉,相关文献尚不明确:评估使用单颗种植体的下颌覆盖义齿的两种连接系统(O形环和Locator)对生活质量、最大咬合力(BF)和咀嚼效率(ME)的影响:在一项交叉研究中,随机选取了28名下颌干骺端种植体完全缺失的义齿佩戴者,并将其分为两组,分别考虑O形环和Locator连接体类型。研究人员分别使用口腔健康影响档案(OHIP-Edent)和老年口腔健康判断指数(GOHAI)问卷对患者的生活质量和口腔健康自我感觉进行了评估。使用咬合动力计测量 BF,通过咀嚼不同次数的硅胶块和杏仁测量 ME:结果:两种义齿系统在自我感觉口腔健康和对生活质量的影响方面没有差异(P > .05)。O 环型系统的 BF 值明显高于定位型系统(p = .04)。无论咀嚼的食物是什么,附着物的类型在统计学上没有明显差异(p > .05)。只有在咀嚼杏仁时,ME 与咀嚼周期成正比(p 结论:ME 与咀嚼周期成正比):定位器和 O 型环嵌体对患者的生活质量、口腔健康自我感觉和 ME 的影响相似。此外,O 形环系统在 BF 中表现出更优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
期刊最新文献
Application of Action Observation Therapy in Swallowing Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Study. Burning Mouth Syndrome May Essentially Be Related To Psychoneuroimmunology: Mechanism Hypothesis. Effects of Mandibular Advancement Device on Genioglossus of Rabbits in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Through PINK1/Parkin Pathway. Predictive Factors for Swallowing Function Decline in Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study. Reporting of Search Strategy Among Systematic Reviews in Leading Dental Specialty Journals: A Research-On-Research Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1