Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light method in the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.

Q3 Medicine Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_82_23
Aliakbar Sabermoghadam, Mohammad Sharifi, Mohammad Taghi Shakeri
{"title":"Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light method in the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.","authors":"Aliakbar Sabermoghadam, Mohammad Sharifi, Mohammad Taghi Shakeri","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_82_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light (SL) method in the diagnosis of ocular cyclotorsion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty eyes of 60 individuals (10-60 years old), with mean visual acuity of 0.08 ± 0.14 LogMAR, were divided into two groups (normal and torsion groups). Individuals without ocular motility disorder were selected as normal and patients with extraocular motility disorders and oblique muscle dysfunctions as the torsion group. The sensitivity and specificity of SL in the diagnosis of ocular torsion were measured by masked investigators and compared to fundus photography (FP). Inter- and intraobserver variability of these techniques was also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amounts of sensitivity and specificity of SL, measured by the first examiner, were 60% and 92% for intorsion and 50% and 96% for extorsion assessment, respectively. These amounts were 53% and 95% for intorsion, and 54% and 97% for extorsion by the second examiner. The contingency coefficient between the two examiners was 68.6% for SL. This amount was 61% between FP and SL for the first examiner and 63% for the second. The contingency coefficient for the repeatability of SL was 72.2% for the first examiner and 75.7% for the second. This amount was 71.2% between the two examiners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SL can be considered a useful method for the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 2","pages":"245-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_82_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light (SL) method in the diagnosis of ocular cyclotorsion.

Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty eyes of 60 individuals (10-60 years old), with mean visual acuity of 0.08 ± 0.14 LogMAR, were divided into two groups (normal and torsion groups). Individuals without ocular motility disorder were selected as normal and patients with extraocular motility disorders and oblique muscle dysfunctions as the torsion group. The sensitivity and specificity of SL in the diagnosis of ocular torsion were measured by masked investigators and compared to fundus photography (FP). Inter- and intraobserver variability of these techniques was also determined.

Results: The amounts of sensitivity and specificity of SL, measured by the first examiner, were 60% and 92% for intorsion and 50% and 96% for extorsion assessment, respectively. These amounts were 53% and 95% for intorsion, and 54% and 97% for extorsion by the second examiner. The contingency coefficient between the two examiners was 68.6% for SL. This amount was 61% between FP and SL for the first examiner and 63% for the second. The contingency coefficient for the repeatability of SL was 72.2% for the first examiner and 75.7% for the second. This amount was 71.2% between the two examiners.

Conclusion: SL can be considered a useful method for the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估裂隙光法诊断环状扭转的敏感性和特异性。
目的:本研究旨在评估裂隙灯(SL)法在诊断眼球旋前扭转中的敏感性和特异性:将 60 名患者(10-60 岁)的 120 只眼睛分为两组(正常组和扭转组),他们的平均视力为 0.08 ± 0.14 LogMAR。无眼球运动障碍者为正常组,有眼外肌运动障碍和斜肌功能障碍的患者为扭转组。由蒙面调查员测量 SL 诊断眼球扭转的灵敏度和特异性,并与眼底摄影(FP)进行比较。同时还确定了这些技术在观察者之间和观察者内部的差异性:由第一位检查者测量的SL灵敏度和特异性分别为:内翻60%和92%,外翻50%和96%。第二位检查者对内翻的敏感度和特异度分别为 53% 和 95%,对外翻的敏感度和特异度分别为 54% 和 97%。在 SL 方面,两名考官之间的或然系数为 68.6%。第一位主考官在 FP 和 SL 之间的或然系数为 61%,第二位主考官为 63%。在 SL 的重复性方面,第一位主考官的或然系数为 72.2%,第二位主考官为 75.7%。结论:SL可被视为诊断旋前扭转的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study of the incidence, patterns, and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in infants with birth weight >1500 g in a South Indian tertiary care hospital. An update of multimodal imaging in white dot syndrome. Anterior segment ischemia following scleral buckle surgery: The forgotten enemy. "Headlight in the fog" fundus appearance: Is just a sign and not a conclusion. Before blaming severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as trigger of new-onset ocular myasthenia, alternative etiologies must be ruled out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1