M.C. (Christien) Van der Linden , M. (Merel) Van Loon-van Gaalen , S.A.G. (Sven) Meylaerts , H.M.E. (Jet) Quarles Van Ufford , A. (Annemarie) Woldhek , G. (Geesje) Van Woerden , N. (Naomi) Van der Linden
{"title":"Improving emergency department flow by introducing four interventions simultaneously. A quality improvement project","authors":"M.C. (Christien) Van der Linden , M. (Merel) Van Loon-van Gaalen , S.A.G. (Sven) Meylaerts , H.M.E. (Jet) Quarles Van Ufford , A. (Annemarie) Woldhek , G. (Geesje) Van Woerden , N. (Naomi) Van der Linden","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread issue with adverse effects on patient care and outcomes.</p><p><em>Local problem:</em> ED crowding exacerbates wait times and compromises patient care, prompting opportunities for internal process improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Over one week, the ED flow project team implemented four interventions, including an additional triage station, to optimize patient flow. We compared triage times, length of stay, crowding levels, and patient experiences with two control periods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During peak hours, waiting times to triage decreased significantly with a median of 20 min (IQR 15–30) in the project week and 26 min (IQR 18–37) in the control weeks. Self-referrals decreased, while general practitioner referrals remained unchanged. Individual patient length of stay was unaffected, but crowding reduced notably during the project week. We found no difference in patient experiences between the periods.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The interventions contributed to reduced crowding and improved patient flow. The dedication of the ED flow project team and the ED nurses was crucial to these outcomes. An additional triage station during peak hours in the ED was established as a structural change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000946/pdfft?md5=d7827f54f421ee259a0ee532b505586b&pid=1-s2.0-S1755599X24000946-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X24000946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread issue with adverse effects on patient care and outcomes.
Local problem: ED crowding exacerbates wait times and compromises patient care, prompting opportunities for internal process improvement.
Method
Over one week, the ED flow project team implemented four interventions, including an additional triage station, to optimize patient flow. We compared triage times, length of stay, crowding levels, and patient experiences with two control periods.
Results
During peak hours, waiting times to triage decreased significantly with a median of 20 min (IQR 15–30) in the project week and 26 min (IQR 18–37) in the control weeks. Self-referrals decreased, while general practitioner referrals remained unchanged. Individual patient length of stay was unaffected, but crowding reduced notably during the project week. We found no difference in patient experiences between the periods.
Conclusion
The interventions contributed to reduced crowding and improved patient flow. The dedication of the ED flow project team and the ED nurses was crucial to these outcomes. An additional triage station during peak hours in the ED was established as a structural change.
期刊介绍:
International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care.
The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.