Assessing Heterogeneity Effects on Points A, B, and Organs at Risk Doses in High-dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer - A Comparison of 192Ir and 60Co Sources Using Monte Carlo N-Particle 5.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_162_23
Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi, Sedigheh Sina, Ali Soleimani Meigooni
{"title":"Assessing Heterogeneity Effects on Points A, B, and Organs at Risk Doses in High-dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer - A Comparison of <sup>192</sup>Ir and <sup>60</sup>Co Sources Using Monte Carlo N-Particle 5.","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi, Sedigheh Sina, Ali Soleimani Meigooni","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_162_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present article deals with investigating the effects of tissue heterogeneity consideration on the dose distribution of <sup>192</sup>Ir and <sup>60</sup>Co sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A Monte Carlo N-Particle 5 (MCNP5) code was developed for the simulation of the dose distribution in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms for cervical cancer patients. The phantoms represented water-equivalent and human body-equivalent tissues. Treatment data for a patient undergoing HDR-BT with a <sup>192</sup>Ir source were used as a reference for validation, and for <sup>60</sup>Co, AAPM Task Group 43 methodology was also applied. The dose values were calculated for both source types in the phantoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed a good agreement between the calculated dose in the homogeneous phantom and the real patient's treatment data, with a relative difference of less than 5% for both sources. However, when comparing the absorbed doses at critical points such as Point A right, Point A left, Point B right, Point B left, bladder International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) point, and recto-vaginal ICRU point, the study revealed significant percentage differences (approximately 5.85% to 12.02%) between the homogeneous and heterogeneous setups for both <sup>192</sup>Ir and <sup>60</sup>Co sources. The analysis of dose-volume histograms (DVH) indicated that organs at risk, notably the rectum and bladder, still received doses within recommended limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concludes that <sup>60</sup>Co and <sup>192</sup>Ir sources can be effectively used in HDR-BT, provided that careful consideration is given to tissue heterogeneity effects during treatment planning to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_162_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present article deals with investigating the effects of tissue heterogeneity consideration on the dose distribution of 192Ir and 60Co sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT).

Materials and methods: A Monte Carlo N-Particle 5 (MCNP5) code was developed for the simulation of the dose distribution in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms for cervical cancer patients. The phantoms represented water-equivalent and human body-equivalent tissues. Treatment data for a patient undergoing HDR-BT with a 192Ir source were used as a reference for validation, and for 60Co, AAPM Task Group 43 methodology was also applied. The dose values were calculated for both source types in the phantoms.

Results: The results showed a good agreement between the calculated dose in the homogeneous phantom and the real patient's treatment data, with a relative difference of less than 5% for both sources. However, when comparing the absorbed doses at critical points such as Point A right, Point A left, Point B right, Point B left, bladder International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) point, and recto-vaginal ICRU point, the study revealed significant percentage differences (approximately 5.85% to 12.02%) between the homogeneous and heterogeneous setups for both 192Ir and 60Co sources. The analysis of dose-volume histograms (DVH) indicated that organs at risk, notably the rectum and bladder, still received doses within recommended limits.

Conclusions: The study concludes that 60Co and 192Ir sources can be effectively used in HDR-BT, provided that careful consideration is given to tissue heterogeneity effects during treatment planning to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估宫颈癌高剂量率近距离治疗中 A、B 点和危险器官剂量的异质性影响--使用蒙特卡洛 N 粒子 5 比较 192Ir 和 60Co 源。
目的:本文旨在研究组织异质性因素对高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)中 192Ir 和 60Co 放射源剂量分布的影响:开发了蒙特卡洛 N 粒子 5 (MCNP5) 代码,用于模拟宫颈癌患者在同质和异质模型中的剂量分布。模型代表等同于水的组织和等同于人体的组织。使用 192Ir 源进行 HDR-BT 治疗的患者的治疗数据被用作验证参考,对于 60Co,也采用了 AAPM 第 43 工作组的方法。计算了两种源在模型中的剂量值:结果表明,均质模型中的计算剂量与真实患者的治疗数据非常吻合,两种源的相对差异均小于 5%。然而,在比较关键点的吸收剂量时,如 A 点右侧、A 点左侧、B 点右侧、B 点左侧、膀胱国际辐射单位和测量委员会(ICRU)点和直肠阴道 ICRU 点,研究发现 192Ir 和 60Co 放射源的同质和异质设置之间存在显著的百分比差异(约 5.85% 至 12.02%)。剂量-体积直方图(DVH)分析表明,有风险的器官,特别是直肠和膀胱,受到的剂量仍在建议范围之内:该研究得出结论,60Co 和 192Ir 放射源可有效用于 HDR-BT,但在治疗规划时必须仔细考虑组织异质性效应,以确保最佳治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Actinium-225 in Targeted Alpha Therapy. Analyzing Global Cancer Control: Progress of National Cancer Control Programs through Composite Indicators and Regression Modeling. Assessing Heterogeneity Effects on Points A, B, and Organs at Risk Doses in High-dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer - A Comparison of 192Ir and 60Co Sources Using Monte Carlo N-Particle 5. Breast Cancer Subtype Prediction Model Employing Artificial Neural Network and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography. Commissioning of the First MRlinac in Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1