Mageshraja Kannan, Sathiyan Saminathan, B Shwetha, Varatharaj Chandraraj, D Gowtham Raj, K M Ganesh
{"title":"Validation of Microionization Chambers in Small-field Dosimetry.","authors":"Mageshraja Kannan, Sathiyan Saminathan, B Shwetha, Varatharaj Chandraraj, D Gowtham Raj, K M Ganesh","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_9_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to validate the Razor Nano Chamber (RNC) and Razor Chamber (RC) dosimetric characteristics in a small field. The dosimetric parameters of the two chambers were compared.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The chamber characteristics of leakage (pre and post), stability, energy dependency, dose linearity, dose rate effect, stem effect, angular dependency, ion recombination effect, and polarity effect were studied. Relative dose measurements of the percentage depth dose, profile measurement, and output factor (OF) measurements were performed for small fields. All measurements were performed in a Theratron 780E telecobalt unit and an Elekta Versa HD™ Linear Accelerator.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The measured pre- and postirradiation leakage and energy dependency were within 0.5% of the acceptable limit. In the stability check, the standard error and standard error of mean were 0.047% and 0.068%, respectively, for both RNC and RC. The deviation in the angular responses of the RNC and RC ion chambers was negligible. In the ion recombination measurements, both the RNC and RC were overestimated for the 10 flattening filter-free photon beam. In small fields, there were no significant differences in the k<sub>pol</sub> values for either chamber. The RNC showed good agreement in the relative dose measurements compared to the RC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RNC and RC showed good agreement in small-field dosimetry. The RNC angular dependency and OF showed a superior response compared to the RC because of the small volume spherical shape and high spatial resolution, which gives a reduced penumbra and no volume averaging effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 2","pages":"285-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_9_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to validate the Razor Nano Chamber (RNC) and Razor Chamber (RC) dosimetric characteristics in a small field. The dosimetric parameters of the two chambers were compared.
Materials and methods: The chamber characteristics of leakage (pre and post), stability, energy dependency, dose linearity, dose rate effect, stem effect, angular dependency, ion recombination effect, and polarity effect were studied. Relative dose measurements of the percentage depth dose, profile measurement, and output factor (OF) measurements were performed for small fields. All measurements were performed in a Theratron 780E telecobalt unit and an Elekta Versa HD™ Linear Accelerator.
Results and discussion: The measured pre- and postirradiation leakage and energy dependency were within 0.5% of the acceptable limit. In the stability check, the standard error and standard error of mean were 0.047% and 0.068%, respectively, for both RNC and RC. The deviation in the angular responses of the RNC and RC ion chambers was negligible. In the ion recombination measurements, both the RNC and RC were overestimated for the 10 flattening filter-free photon beam. In small fields, there were no significant differences in the kpol values for either chamber. The RNC showed good agreement in the relative dose measurements compared to the RC.
Conclusion: RNC and RC showed good agreement in small-field dosimetry. The RNC angular dependency and OF showed a superior response compared to the RC because of the small volume spherical shape and high spatial resolution, which gives a reduced penumbra and no volume averaging effect.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.