Fire exclusion alters forest evapotranspiration: A comprehensive water budget analysis in longleaf pine woodlands

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Monographs Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1002/ecm.1623
Steven T. Brantley, O. Stribling Stuber, Dakota L. Holder, R. Scott Taylor
{"title":"Fire exclusion alters forest evapotranspiration: A comprehensive water budget analysis in longleaf pine woodlands","authors":"Steven T. Brantley,&nbsp;O. Stribling Stuber,&nbsp;Dakota L. Holder,&nbsp;R. Scott Taylor","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forests are critical to water resources, but high evapotranspiration (ET) can reduce water yield. Thinning and prescribed fire reduce forest density and often reduce ET, promoting higher water yield. However, results from such treatments have been inconsistent, possibly because of unknown interactions among individual ET components. We compare water budget components of longleaf pine (<i>Pinus palustris</i> Mill.) woodlands with frequent prescribed fire to the water budget components of fire-excluded stands. We hypothesized that fire exclusion would result in higher ET due to increased midstory transpiration (<i>E</i><sub>t</sub>) and interception (<i>E</i><sub>i</sub>), and higher evaporation from litter (<i>I</i><sub>litter</sub>). Reference plots were burned every two years while treatment plots had fire excluded for 15–20 years. Fire treatments were repeated in two sites representing a soil moisture gradient, noted as mesic and xeric. We measured woody <i>E</i><sub>t</sub> using sap flux, and we modeled groundcover <i>E</i><sub>t</sub> using physiological models. We measured <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> of canopy and groundcover layers, modeled <i>E</i><sub>s</sub> litter biomass, and constructed a total component-based water budget for each site and treatment. Compared with reference plots, midstory <i>E</i><sub>t</sub> was 300%–800% higher in fire exclusion plots. Groundcover <i>E</i><sub>t</sub> was ~80% less than reference treatments, countering the effects of midstory growth on total ET. Stand <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> followed similar trends, with groundcover <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> in reference plots countering the effects of midstory and litter <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> in fire exclusion plots. As expected, total ET in the xeric site was 18% higher in fire exclusion plots. However, ET in the mesic site was 16% lower in the fire exclusion plots due to high groundcover <i>E</i><sub>t</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>i</sub> in reference plots. Thus, our results show that fire exclusion changes total forest ET, but the size and direction of the effect vary depending on the balance between midstory and groundcover transpiration and interception. These results highlight the importance of groundcover in ecosystem function in low-density forests and may help explain inconsistent results from studies of water yields following thinning and fire. While prescribed fire is a valuable tool in forest management, we suggest that the effects of fire on ET are complex and require careful accounting of all water fluxes within a forest ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests are critical to water resources, but high evapotranspiration (ET) can reduce water yield. Thinning and prescribed fire reduce forest density and often reduce ET, promoting higher water yield. However, results from such treatments have been inconsistent, possibly because of unknown interactions among individual ET components. We compare water budget components of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) woodlands with frequent prescribed fire to the water budget components of fire-excluded stands. We hypothesized that fire exclusion would result in higher ET due to increased midstory transpiration (Et) and interception (Ei), and higher evaporation from litter (Ilitter). Reference plots were burned every two years while treatment plots had fire excluded for 15–20 years. Fire treatments were repeated in two sites representing a soil moisture gradient, noted as mesic and xeric. We measured woody Et using sap flux, and we modeled groundcover Et using physiological models. We measured Ei of canopy and groundcover layers, modeled Es litter biomass, and constructed a total component-based water budget for each site and treatment. Compared with reference plots, midstory Et was 300%–800% higher in fire exclusion plots. Groundcover Et was ~80% less than reference treatments, countering the effects of midstory growth on total ET. Stand Ei followed similar trends, with groundcover Ei in reference plots countering the effects of midstory and litter Ei in fire exclusion plots. As expected, total ET in the xeric site was 18% higher in fire exclusion plots. However, ET in the mesic site was 16% lower in the fire exclusion plots due to high groundcover Et and Ei in reference plots. Thus, our results show that fire exclusion changes total forest ET, but the size and direction of the effect vary depending on the balance between midstory and groundcover transpiration and interception. These results highlight the importance of groundcover in ecosystem function in low-density forests and may help explain inconsistent results from studies of water yields following thinning and fire. While prescribed fire is a valuable tool in forest management, we suggest that the effects of fire on ET are complex and require careful accounting of all water fluxes within a forest ecosystem.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
火灾排斥改变了森林蒸散作用:长叶松林地的综合水预算分析
森林对水资源至关重要,但高蒸散量(ET)会降低产水量。疏伐和明火会降低森林密度,通常也会减少蒸散发,从而提高产水量。然而,此类处理的结果并不一致,这可能是因为各个蒸散发成分之间的相互作用未知。我们比较了长叶松(Pinus palustris Mill.)我们假设,由于中层蒸腾作用(Et)和截流作用(Ei)的增加以及枯落物蒸发量(Ilitter)的增加,火灾排除会导致蒸散发量的增加。参考地块每两年燃烧一次,而处理地块则在 15-20 年内禁火。在两个代表土壤湿度梯度的地点重复进行火烧处理,分别为中性和干旱地区。我们利用树液通量测量了木本植物的 Et,并利用生理模型模拟了地被植物的 Et。我们测量了冠层和地被层的 Ei,建立了枯落物生物量模型,并为每个地点和处理构建了基于总组分的水分预算。与参比地块相比,火灾排除地块的中层Et高出300%-800%。地表植被蒸散发比参考处理低 80%,抵消了中层生长对总蒸散发的影响。林分蒸散发也呈类似趋势,参考地块中的地被植物蒸散发抵消了防火隔离地块中的中生植物和枯落物蒸散发的影响。不出所料,干旱地块的总蒸散发比防火隔离地块高出 18%。然而,由于参考地块的高地被Et和Ei,中生地块的蒸散发比隔离防火地块低16%。因此,我们的研究结果表明,阻火会改变森林的总蒸散发,但影响的大小和方向会因中生植物和地被植物的蒸腾和截获之间的平衡而有所不同。这些结果凸显了地被植物在低密度森林生态系统功能中的重要性,并有助于解释疏伐和火烧后产水量研究结果不一致的原因。虽然规定用火是森林管理中的一个重要工具,但我们认为火对蒸散发的影响是复杂的,需要仔细考虑森林生态系统中的所有水通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Climate and management changes over 40 years drove more stress-tolerant and less ruderal weed communities in vineyards The primacy of density-mediated indirect effects in a community of wolves, elk, and aspen Understanding the chemodiversity of plants: Quantification, variation and ecological function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1