An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research

Saleh F.A. Khatib
{"title":"An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research","authors":"Saleh F.A. Khatib","doi":"10.1108/cg-12-2023-0507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to conduct a comprehensive methodological review, exploring the strategies used to address endogeneity within the realms of corporate governance and financial reporting.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research reviews the application of various methods to deal with endogeneity issue published in the 10 journals covering the corporate governance discipline included in the Web of Science’s Social Sciences Citation Index.\n\n\nFindings\nWith a focus on empirical studies published in leading journals, the author scrutinizes the prevalence of endogeneity and the methodologies applied to mitigate its effects. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on the two-stage least squares (2SLS) technique, a widely adopted instrumental variable (IV) approach. However, a notable observation emerges concerning the inconsistent utilization of clear exogenous IVs in some studies, highlighting a potential limitation in the application of 2SLS. Recognizing the challenges in identifying exogenous variables, the author proposes the generalized method of moments (GMM) as a viable alternative. GMM offers flexibility by not imposing the same exogeneity requirement on IVs but necessitates a larger sample size and an extended sample period.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper sensitizes researchers to the critical concern of endogeneity bias in governance research. It provides an outline for diagnosing and correcting potential bias, contributing to the awareness among researchers and encouraging a more critical approach to methodological choices, recognizing the prevalence of endogeneity in empirical studies, particularly focusing on the widely adopted 2SLS technique.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPractitioners, including corporate executives and managers, can benefit from the study’s insights by recognizing the importance of rigorous empirical research. Understanding the limitations and strengths of methodologies like 2SLS and GMM can inform evidence-based decision-making in the corporate governance realm.\n","PeriodicalId":503557,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2023-0507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to conduct a comprehensive methodological review, exploring the strategies used to address endogeneity within the realms of corporate governance and financial reporting. Design/methodology/approach This research reviews the application of various methods to deal with endogeneity issue published in the 10 journals covering the corporate governance discipline included in the Web of Science’s Social Sciences Citation Index. Findings With a focus on empirical studies published in leading journals, the author scrutinizes the prevalence of endogeneity and the methodologies applied to mitigate its effects. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on the two-stage least squares (2SLS) technique, a widely adopted instrumental variable (IV) approach. However, a notable observation emerges concerning the inconsistent utilization of clear exogenous IVs in some studies, highlighting a potential limitation in the application of 2SLS. Recognizing the challenges in identifying exogenous variables, the author proposes the generalized method of moments (GMM) as a viable alternative. GMM offers flexibility by not imposing the same exogeneity requirement on IVs but necessitates a larger sample size and an extended sample period. Research limitations/implications The paper sensitizes researchers to the critical concern of endogeneity bias in governance research. It provides an outline for diagnosing and correcting potential bias, contributing to the awareness among researchers and encouraging a more critical approach to methodological choices, recognizing the prevalence of endogeneity in empirical studies, particularly focusing on the widely adopted 2SLS technique. Originality/value Practitioners, including corporate executives and managers, can benefit from the study’s insights by recognizing the importance of rigorous empirical research. Understanding the limitations and strengths of methodologies like 2SLS and GMM can inform evidence-based decision-making in the corporate governance realm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估公司治理和报告研究中处理内生性的方法
目的本研究旨在对方法论进行全面回顾,探讨在公司治理和财务报告领域内解决内生性问题的策略。研究回顾了《科学网社会科学引文索引》中涵盖公司治理学科的 10 种期刊上发表的解决内生性问题的各种方法的应用。分析表明,内生性主要依赖于两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)技术,这是一种广泛采用的工具变量(IV)方法。然而,一个值得注意的现象是,一些研究中对明确的外生 IV 的使用并不一致,这凸显了 2SLS 应用的潜在局限性。作者认识到识别外生变量的挑战,提出了广义矩方法(GMM)作为可行的替代方法。GMM 不对 IVs 施加相同的外生性要求,因而具有灵活性,但需要更大的样本量和更长的样本期。它提供了诊断和纠正潜在偏差的大纲,有助于提高研究人员的认识,并鼓励他们在方法选择上采取更加严谨的态度,认识到实证研究中普遍存在的内生性问题,特别是重点关注广泛采用的 2SLS 技术。原创性/价值包括企业高管和经理在内的从业人员可以从本研究的见解中受益,认识到严谨的实证研究的重要性。了解 2SLS 和 GMM 等方法的局限性和优势可以为公司治理领域的循证决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research An assessment of methods to deal with endogeneity in corporate governance and reporting research Exploring the nexus between CEO characteristics and the value of excess cash holdings through the lens of the resource-based view theory Corporate governance disclosure by Italian universities: an empirical analysis of the determinants Board of director characteristics and corporate labour investment efficiency: empirical evidence from European-listed firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1