Particle Dune Height Prediction

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1007/s13369-024-09402-x
Ashtiwi Bahri, Shabeeb Alajmei, Jennifer Miskimins
{"title":"Particle Dune Height Prediction","authors":"Ashtiwi Bahri,&nbsp;Shabeeb Alajmei,&nbsp;Jennifer Miskimins","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09402-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Slickwater hydraulic fracturing treatments are considered one of the most effective stimulation technologies for unconventional reservoirs. However, achieving efficient proppant transport in slickwater fluid systems remains a significant challenge due to the low viscosities. A particular aspect of this challenge involves accurately estimating the height of settled proppant dunes within the created fractures. To address this issue, experimental studies were undertaken to measure the dune height of the settled proppant using two different slickwater-like fluid systems, water–sodium chloride solution to mimic increased density and water–glycerin solution to mimic increased viscosity. The measured heights of the settled proppant dune using these systems were further compared to calculated proppant dune height using previous published correlations. This comparison aimed to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the existing correlations in predicting proppant dune height in a wider range of tested fluid systems and various proppant types. To acquire sufficient data for the comparison, a slot flow apparatus was designed and employed to conduct over 30 experiments. The fracture slot design consisted of a primary fracture along with three secondary fractures and two tertiary fractures, each characterized with a rough wall surface. Various parameters were systematically varied during the experiments, including proppant sizes, proppant densities, slurry rates, and proppant concentrations. These selected experimental conditions aimed to provide a robust dataset for the purpose of comparing and analyzing the effects of different factors on proppant dune height in the slot flow apparatus. The laboratory results show that for all tested proppants, water–glycerin solutions resulted in a lower equilibrium dune height compared to sodium chloride solutions. Additionally, the proppant particle size was found to have a significant impact on the equilibrium dune height inside the main fracture, smaller proppant created lower dune heights in comparison to larger proppant sizes. Additionally, the settled proppant reaches the equilibrium dune height more rapidly with the water–sodium chloride solution than the water–glycerin solution. Furthermore, the calculated equilibrium dune height indicated that the correlations can be reliably used to predict the equilibrium dune height, with minimal average percent difference compared to the measured dune heights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54354,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"50 7","pages":"4853 - 4868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13369-024-09402-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slickwater hydraulic fracturing treatments are considered one of the most effective stimulation technologies for unconventional reservoirs. However, achieving efficient proppant transport in slickwater fluid systems remains a significant challenge due to the low viscosities. A particular aspect of this challenge involves accurately estimating the height of settled proppant dunes within the created fractures. To address this issue, experimental studies were undertaken to measure the dune height of the settled proppant using two different slickwater-like fluid systems, water–sodium chloride solution to mimic increased density and water–glycerin solution to mimic increased viscosity. The measured heights of the settled proppant dune using these systems were further compared to calculated proppant dune height using previous published correlations. This comparison aimed to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the existing correlations in predicting proppant dune height in a wider range of tested fluid systems and various proppant types. To acquire sufficient data for the comparison, a slot flow apparatus was designed and employed to conduct over 30 experiments. The fracture slot design consisted of a primary fracture along with three secondary fractures and two tertiary fractures, each characterized with a rough wall surface. Various parameters were systematically varied during the experiments, including proppant sizes, proppant densities, slurry rates, and proppant concentrations. These selected experimental conditions aimed to provide a robust dataset for the purpose of comparing and analyzing the effects of different factors on proppant dune height in the slot flow apparatus. The laboratory results show that for all tested proppants, water–glycerin solutions resulted in a lower equilibrium dune height compared to sodium chloride solutions. Additionally, the proppant particle size was found to have a significant impact on the equilibrium dune height inside the main fracture, smaller proppant created lower dune heights in comparison to larger proppant sizes. Additionally, the settled proppant reaches the equilibrium dune height more rapidly with the water–sodium chloride solution than the water–glycerin solution. Furthermore, the calculated equilibrium dune height indicated that the correlations can be reliably used to predict the equilibrium dune height, with minimal average percent difference compared to the measured dune heights.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颗粒沙丘高度预测
滑溜水水力压裂被认为是非常规油藏最有效的增产技术之一。然而,由于滑溜水体系的低粘度,实现支撑剂的高效输送仍然是一个重大挑战。这一挑战的一个特殊方面包括准确估计裂缝内沉降支撑剂沙丘的高度。为了解决这个问题,研究人员进行了实验研究,使用两种不同的滑溜水状流体系统,水-氯化钠溶液模拟密度增加,水-甘油溶液模拟粘度增加,来测量沉降支撑剂的沙丘高度。使用这些系统测量的沉降支撑剂沙丘高度与使用先前公布的相关性计算的支撑剂沙丘高度进行了进一步比较。该对比旨在评估在更广泛的测试流体系统和各种支撑剂类型中,现有相关性在预测支撑剂沙丘高度方面的准确性和适用性。为了获得足够的对比数据,设计了槽流装置,并进行了30多次实验。裂缝槽设计由一条主裂缝、三条次裂缝和两条次裂缝组成,每条裂缝的特征都是粗糙的壁面。在实验过程中,系统地改变了各种参数,包括支撑剂尺寸、支撑剂密度、泥浆速率和支撑剂浓度。这些选定的实验条件旨在提供一个强大的数据集,用于比较和分析不同因素对槽流装置中支撑剂沙丘高度的影响。实验室结果表明,对于所有测试的支撑剂,与氯化钠溶液相比,水-甘油溶液导致的平衡沙丘高度较低。此外,研究发现支撑剂粒径对主裂缝内的平衡沙丘高度有显著影响,较小的支撑剂比较大的支撑剂产生较低的沙丘高度。此外,沉淀的支撑剂在水-氯化钠溶液中比在水-甘油溶液中更快地达到平衡沙丘高度。此外,计算的平衡沙丘高度表明,相关系数可以可靠地用于预测平衡沙丘高度,与实测沙丘高度的平均百分比差异最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
993
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
期刊最新文献
Smart Crosslinked Polymer Gels for Water Shutoff in Oil Reservoir: A Comprehensive Review on Materials, Mechanisms, and Field Applications Meerkat-Optimized SENet Approach: Advancements in Retinal Fundus Image Augmentation and Classification Impact of Temperature and MgO on Cordierite Ceramics Prepared Through Conventional Reaction Sintering of Nano-powders of Al2O3, SiO2, and MgO A Novel Self-Sufficient Model Integrating LNG Regasification and Air Separation Unit: Energy and Exergy Analysis Analyzing Heat Transfer and Irreversibility via Aggregation Dynamics in Darcy-Forchheimer Flow and Nonlinear Thermal Radiation Effects Utilizing Artificial Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1