Principles for delivering transformative co‐design methodologies with multiple stakeholders for achieving nature recovery in England

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Area Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1111/area.12963
Lucy Barkley, Charlotte‐Anne Chivers, C.S. Short, Hannah Bloxham
{"title":"Principles for delivering transformative co‐design methodologies with multiple stakeholders for achieving nature recovery in England","authors":"Lucy Barkley, Charlotte‐Anne Chivers, C.S. Short, Hannah Bloxham","doi":"10.1111/area.12963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving successful multi‐stakeholder collaboration for sustainable outcomes is complex. This paper provides key principles for future co‐design projects aimed at fostering an inclusive approach to research. These have been developed based on a novel methodology that co‐designed the essential components of a long‐term, collaborative agreement for a nature recovery scheme in England. Using an assortment of iterative, deliberative participatory methods, this research engaged a wide variety of stakeholders to produce a template agreement for an agri‐environmental policy. We demonstrate that a flexible, highly reflective approach resulted in positive engagement with previously marginalised stakeholders. The approach also successfully navigated the unequal power dynamics seen both within and between groups. Finally, multiple feedback loops allowed participants to continually build on previous interactions as they developed and reviewed the agreement. By drawing out the complexities of the co‐design process, this paper explains how co‐design efforts can produce potentially transformative outputs. We hope that the principles introduced here offer a useful starting point for those planning to undertake multi‐stakeholder co‐design.","PeriodicalId":8422,"journal":{"name":"Area","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving successful multi‐stakeholder collaboration for sustainable outcomes is complex. This paper provides key principles for future co‐design projects aimed at fostering an inclusive approach to research. These have been developed based on a novel methodology that co‐designed the essential components of a long‐term, collaborative agreement for a nature recovery scheme in England. Using an assortment of iterative, deliberative participatory methods, this research engaged a wide variety of stakeholders to produce a template agreement for an agri‐environmental policy. We demonstrate that a flexible, highly reflective approach resulted in positive engagement with previously marginalised stakeholders. The approach also successfully navigated the unequal power dynamics seen both within and between groups. Finally, multiple feedback loops allowed participants to continually build on previous interactions as they developed and reviewed the agreement. By drawing out the complexities of the co‐design process, this paper explains how co‐design efforts can produce potentially transformative outputs. We hope that the principles introduced here offer a useful starting point for those planning to undertake multi‐stakeholder co‐design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与多方利益相关者共同采用变革性共同设计方法在英格兰实现自然恢复的原则
成功实现多利益相关方合作以取得可持续成果是一项复杂的工作。本文为未来旨在促进包容性研究方法的共同设计项目提供了关键原则。这些原则是根据一种新颖的方法制定的,该方法共同设计了英格兰一项自然恢复计划的长期合作协议的重要组成部分。这项研究采用了多种迭代、审议参与式方法,让众多利益相关者参与其中,为一项农业环境政策制定了模板协议。我们证明,灵活、高度反思的方法促成了与之前被边缘化的利益相关者的积极接触。这种方法还成功地驾驭了群体内部和群体之间不平等的权力动态。最后,在制定和审查协议的过程中,多重反馈回路使参与者能够在以往互动的基础上继续发展。通过阐述共同设计过程的复杂性,本文解释了共同设计工作如何产生潜在的变革性成果。我们希望本文介绍的原则能为那些计划开展多方利益相关者共同设计的人提供一个有用的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Area
Area GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Area publishes ground breaking geographical research and scholarship across the field of geography. Whatever your interests, reading Area is essential to keep up with the latest thinking in geography. At the cutting edge of the discipline, the journal: • is the debating forum for the latest geographical research and ideas • is an outlet for fresh ideas, from both established and new scholars • is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and academics at an early stage in their careers • contains commentaries and debates that focus on topical issues, new research results, methodological theory and practice and academic discussion and debate • provides rapid publication
期刊最新文献
Naming the abyss: The symbolic politics of the oceanic toponymic frontier Principles for delivering transformative co‐design methodologies with multiple stakeholders for achieving nature recovery in England Issue Information Hybrid rangeland governance: Connecting policies with practices in pastoral China Methodological reflections on radio and podcast listenership in political geography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1