The Impact of Calf Stretching Using Inclined Board Standing on Low Back Pain: An Interventional Study

Muhammad Hafeez, Muhammad Zia Ul Haq, Shabana Rahim
{"title":"The Impact of Calf Stretching Using Inclined Board Standing on Low Back Pain: An Interventional Study","authors":"Muhammad Hafeez, Muhammad Zia Ul Haq, Shabana Rahim","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition with significant socio-economic impacts. Among its multifactorial causes, calf muscle tightness is a key mechanical contributor. This study evaluates the impact of a calf stretching intervention on LBP.\nObjective: To assess the effectiveness of calf stretching using an inclined board in reducing pain and disability and improving physical health in individuals with chronic LBP and calf tightness.\nMethods: A single-group intervention design was utilized with 22 participants aged 18-65 years, clinically diagnosed with chronic LBP and calf tightness. The intervention involved a one-minute standing stretch on a 45-degree inclined wedge, performed three times daily for four weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-intervention using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-12 questionnaire. Participants’ compliance was monitored through daily logs, and weekly follow-up sessions ensured correct performance of the stretches. Data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests with SPSS version 25.\nResults: The paired samples t-test showed significant improvements across all measures. The mean NPRS score decreased by 4.40 points (p < 0.001), indicating reduced pain. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-12 improved by 12.96 points (p < 0.001), reflecting enhanced physical health. The ODI score reduced by 4.40 points (p < 0.001), suggesting decreased disability.\nConclusion: The study demonstrates that a structured calf stretching program significantly reduces pain and disability while improving physical health in individuals with LBP and calf tightness. Incorporating calf flexibility assessments and interventions can be crucial in LBP management.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition with significant socio-economic impacts. Among its multifactorial causes, calf muscle tightness is a key mechanical contributor. This study evaluates the impact of a calf stretching intervention on LBP. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of calf stretching using an inclined board in reducing pain and disability and improving physical health in individuals with chronic LBP and calf tightness. Methods: A single-group intervention design was utilized with 22 participants aged 18-65 years, clinically diagnosed with chronic LBP and calf tightness. The intervention involved a one-minute standing stretch on a 45-degree inclined wedge, performed three times daily for four weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-intervention using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-12 questionnaire. Participants’ compliance was monitored through daily logs, and weekly follow-up sessions ensured correct performance of the stretches. Data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests with SPSS version 25. Results: The paired samples t-test showed significant improvements across all measures. The mean NPRS score decreased by 4.40 points (p < 0.001), indicating reduced pain. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-12 improved by 12.96 points (p < 0.001), reflecting enhanced physical health. The ODI score reduced by 4.40 points (p < 0.001), suggesting decreased disability. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that a structured calf stretching program significantly reduces pain and disability while improving physical health in individuals with LBP and calf tightness. Incorporating calf flexibility assessments and interventions can be crucial in LBP management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用斜板站立拉伸小腿对腰痛的影响:一项干预性研究
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是一种普遍存在的疾病,对社会经济有重大影响。在导致腰背痛的多种因素中,小腿肌肉紧张是一个关键的机械性因素。本研究评估了小腿拉伸干预对腰背痛的影响:目的:评估使用斜板进行小腿拉伸对减轻慢性枸杞痛和小腿紧绷患者的疼痛和残疾以及改善其身体健康的效果:采用单组干预设计,22 名参与者年龄在 18-65 岁之间,经临床诊断患有慢性腰腿痛和小腿紧绷症。干预措施包括在 45 度斜楔上进行一分钟的站立拉伸,每天三次,持续四周。在基线和干预后使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和 SF-12 问卷进行评估。通过每日日志监测参与者的依从性,每周的随访课程确保了拉伸动作的正确性。数据采用 SPSS 25 版本的配对样本 t 检验进行分析:结果:配对样本 t 检验显示,所有测量指标均有显著改善。NPRS 平均得分降低了 4.40 分(p < 0.001),表明疼痛减轻。SF-12身体成分摘要(PCS)提高了12.96分(p < 0.001),反映出身体健康得到了改善。ODI 评分降低了 4.40 分(p < 0.001),表明残疾程度有所减轻:该研究表明,结构化小腿拉伸计划可显著减轻腰痛和小腿紧绷患者的疼痛和残疾程度,同时改善其身体健康。纳入小腿灵活性评估和干预措施对枸杞多糖症的治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Trace Elements in Pregnant Women with Malaria: A Case-Control Study Tissue Ablation Using Lasers: A Case Series Thirty-year Trend of Non-rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease: A Comparison of Pakistan with South Asia and Global Scenario A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Impact of Routine Case Volume on Door-to-Device Time for Primary PCI Patients: The Concept of a Designated Primary PCI Cath Lab at a Large Volume Cardiac Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1