Esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy: A literature review

Mohammed Matar, Klaus Ulrich Fetzner
{"title":"Esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy: A literature review","authors":"Mohammed Matar, Klaus Ulrich Fetzner","doi":"10.5348/100059s05mm2024ra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aims: This study conducts a comprehensive literature review on esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy for managing benign or neoplastic thyroidal diseases. This article encompasses published cases and studies and focuses on intraoperative esophageal perforation during total or subtotal thyroidectomy. Postoperative complications related to esophageal perforation are also included.\n\n Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases with keywords including “thyroidectomy,” “esophageal perforation,” “postoperative complication,” “incidence,” “risk factors,” and “management.” Inclusion criteria were studies published in English with a sample size greater than 10 patients.\n\n Results: Thirty-eight studies were reviewed, mostly case reports or small case series. The incidence of iatrogenic esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy ranged from 0.1% to 1.5%, with higher rates in minimally invasive and robotic-assisted thyroidectomy compared to open thyroidectomy. Conservative management was successful in 62% of patients, while 38% required surgical repair. Mortality rates varied from 0% to 33% for those undergoing surgical repair.\n\n Conclusion: Esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy is rare, particularly with experienced surgeons or in high-volume centers. It is more common in malignant thyroid diseases. Symptoms range from mild to severe, and diagnosis typically involves endoscopy or computed tomography with contrast. Management depends on the perforation’s characteristics and the patient’s condition, with options including direct suturing, endoscopic stenting, and radical surgery with viable flaps. Complications can include prolonged hospitalization and feeding issues.\n","PeriodicalId":91865,"journal":{"name":"Edorium journal of surgery","volume":"72 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100059s05mm2024ra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study conducts a comprehensive literature review on esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy for managing benign or neoplastic thyroidal diseases. This article encompasses published cases and studies and focuses on intraoperative esophageal perforation during total or subtotal thyroidectomy. Postoperative complications related to esophageal perforation are also included. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases with keywords including “thyroidectomy,” “esophageal perforation,” “postoperative complication,” “incidence,” “risk factors,” and “management.” Inclusion criteria were studies published in English with a sample size greater than 10 patients. Results: Thirty-eight studies were reviewed, mostly case reports or small case series. The incidence of iatrogenic esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy ranged from 0.1% to 1.5%, with higher rates in minimally invasive and robotic-assisted thyroidectomy compared to open thyroidectomy. Conservative management was successful in 62% of patients, while 38% required surgical repair. Mortality rates varied from 0% to 33% for those undergoing surgical repair. Conclusion: Esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy is rare, particularly with experienced surgeons or in high-volume centers. It is more common in malignant thyroid diseases. Symptoms range from mild to severe, and diagnosis typically involves endoscopy or computed tomography with contrast. Management depends on the perforation’s characteristics and the patient’s condition, with options including direct suturing, endoscopic stenting, and radical surgery with viable flaps. Complications can include prolonged hospitalization and feeding issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺切除术中的食管穿孔:文献综述
目的:本研究对治疗良性或肿瘤性甲状腺疾病的甲状腺切除术中食管穿孔进行了全面的文献综述。本文囊括了已发表的病例和研究,重点关注甲状腺全切或次全切术中的术中食管穿孔。文章还包括与食管穿孔相关的术后并发症。方法:使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行系统性文献检索,关键词包括 "甲状腺切除术"、"食管穿孔"、"术后并发症"、"发生率"、"风险因素 "和 "处理"。纳入标准为以英语发表、样本量超过 10 名患者的研究。结果:共审查了 38 项研究,其中大部分为病例报告或小型病例系列。甲状腺切除术中先天性食管穿孔的发生率为 0.1% 到 1.5%,与开放式甲状腺切除术相比,微创和机器人辅助甲状腺切除术的发生率更高。62%的患者保守治疗成功,38%的患者需要手术修复。接受手术修复的患者死亡率从0%到33%不等。结论:甲状腺切除术中发生食管穿孔的情况非常罕见,尤其是经验丰富的外科医生或手术量大的医疗中心。在恶性甲状腺疾病中更为常见。症状从轻微到严重不等,诊断通常需要进行内窥镜检查或造影剂计算机断层扫描。处理方法取决于穿孔的特点和患者的病情,包括直接缝合、内窥镜支架植入和使用可行皮瓣的根治手术。并发症可能包括长期住院和喂养问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Esophageal perforation during thyroidectomy: A literature review A rare presentation of giant gallbladder Evaluation of surgical Apgar score as a predictor of postoperative complications in emergency general surgical patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital Live animals for preclinical medical student surgical training Live animals for preclinical medical student surgical training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1