Comparison of Two Huanglongbing Detection Methods in Samples with Different Symptom Severity

Yenny Sariasih, S. Subandiyah, Sri Widyaningsih, Tahir Khurshid, Jianhua Mo, Nerida Donovan
{"title":"Comparison of Two Huanglongbing Detection Methods in Samples with Different Symptom Severity","authors":"Yenny Sariasih, S. Subandiyah, Sri Widyaningsih, Tahir Khurshid, Jianhua Mo, Nerida Donovan","doi":"10.14692/jfi.20.4.174-186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Huanglongbing or citrus greening in Asia caused by the pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) is one of the most devastating citrus diseases worldwide. This disease is one of the causes of decreased citrus production in Indonesia. Symptoms of huanglongbing in citrus plants in the field and greenhouses have different levels of severity. This study was conducted to detect CLas in several types of samples based on leaf symptoms using conventional and real-time PCR (qPCR). Three pairs of primers were used in this study, a pair of Las606/LSS for conventional PCR and two pairs for qPCR, namely Las931/LSS and Lj900F/Lj900R. The results showed that blotchy mottle is the most easily detected symptom of huanglongbing and found in fields and greenhouses. The Lj900F/Lj900R primer pair is more suitable for detecting CLas pathogens using qPCR than Las606/LSS based on the melting curve and Ct value that appear. qPCR detection is more accurate and sensitive even with lower DNA concentrations. The lower limit of Ct value of healthy leaf samples is 34.08. Citrus leaves are considered positive if the Ct value is less than 34.08. Ct value based on severity or scoring between HLB symptomatic leaves from the field and greenhouse showed a significant difference, i.e. the Ct value of symptomatic samples from the field was lower than that of greenhouse samples.","PeriodicalId":31619,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Fitopatologi Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Fitopatologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14692/jfi.20.4.174-186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Huanglongbing or citrus greening in Asia caused by the pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) is one of the most devastating citrus diseases worldwide. This disease is one of the causes of decreased citrus production in Indonesia. Symptoms of huanglongbing in citrus plants in the field and greenhouses have different levels of severity. This study was conducted to detect CLas in several types of samples based on leaf symptoms using conventional and real-time PCR (qPCR). Three pairs of primers were used in this study, a pair of Las606/LSS for conventional PCR and two pairs for qPCR, namely Las931/LSS and Lj900F/Lj900R. The results showed that blotchy mottle is the most easily detected symptom of huanglongbing and found in fields and greenhouses. The Lj900F/Lj900R primer pair is more suitable for detecting CLas pathogens using qPCR than Las606/LSS based on the melting curve and Ct value that appear. qPCR detection is more accurate and sensitive even with lower DNA concentrations. The lower limit of Ct value of healthy leaf samples is 34.08. Citrus leaves are considered positive if the Ct value is less than 34.08. Ct value based on severity or scoring between HLB symptomatic leaves from the field and greenhouse showed a significant difference, i.e. the Ct value of symptomatic samples from the field was lower than that of greenhouse samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同症状严重程度样本中两种黄龙病检测方法的比较
黄龙病或亚洲柑橘绿化病是由病原菌亚洲自由杆菌(CLas)引起的,是全球最具破坏性的柑橘病害之一。这种病害是导致印度尼西亚柑橘产量下降的原因之一。柑橘黄龙病在田间和温室中的症状轻重不一。本研究采用传统和实时 PCR(qPCR)技术,根据叶片症状检测几类样本中的 CLas。本研究使用了三对引物,一对是用于常规 PCR 的 Las606/LSS,另两对是用于 qPCR 的 Las931/LSS 和 Lj900F/Lj900R。结果表明,斑点斑驳是最容易检测到的黄龙病症状,在田间和温室均可发现。从熔解曲线和 Ct 值来看,Lj900F/Lj900R 引物对比 Las606/LSS 更适合用 qPCR 检测 CLas 病原体。健康叶片样本的 Ct 值下限为 34.08。如果 Ct 值小于 34.08,则柑橘叶片被视为阳性。根据严重程度或评分计算的 Ct 值在田间和温室的 HLB 症状叶片之间存在显著差异,即田间症状样本的 Ct 值低于温室样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Two Huanglongbing Detection Methods in Samples with Different Symptom Severity Phylloplane Yeasts on Cocoa and Their Abilities to Inhibit Phytophthora palmivora In Vitro Cover Jurnal Fitopatologi Vol. 20 No. 1, Januari 2024 Begomovirus Associated with Yellow Mosaic Symptom on Eggplant Plant in Bengkulu Isolation of Potential Nitrogen-Fixing Phylloplane Bacteria and in Vitro Detection of Their Ability to Inhibit the Growth of Colletotrichum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1