Total Daily Energy Expenditure is Overestimated by Dietary References Intake Equations Compared with Doubly Labeled Water in A Sample of Brazilian Adolescents

Lara Bérgamo Silva, L. A. Anjos, M. Rosenburg, Natália Maira da Cruz Alves, Rutinéia de Fátima Micheletto, E. Ferriolli, K. Pfrimer
{"title":"Total Daily Energy Expenditure is Overestimated by Dietary References Intake Equations Compared with Doubly Labeled Water in A Sample of Brazilian Adolescents","authors":"Lara Bérgamo Silva, L. A. Anjos, M. Rosenburg, Natália Maira da Cruz Alves, Rutinéia de Fátima Micheletto, E. Ferriolli, K. Pfrimer","doi":"10.14302/issn.2379-7835.ijn-24-5155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ojective\nThis report aimed to compare the total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) of adolescents measured by doubly labeled water (DLW) with the 2005 and 2023 dietary reference intake (DRI) equations proposed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in a sample of Brazilian adolescents. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional and observational study with a convenience sample of 15 obese and eutrophic adolescents, aged between 11 and 14 years, from public schools and the obesity outpatient clinic of the Clinics Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School – University of São Paulo (HC FMRP-USP) in Brazil. Were obtained stature and weight by conventional methods and used to calculate the body mass index (BMI) to determine the nutritional status. Fat-free mass (FFM) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Energy expenditure was determined by DLW and estimated by the 2005 and 2023 DRI equations. The level of physical activity was measured with the ActivPAL™ accelerometer to classify adolescents within the equations. Results: Forty-seven percent of the sample were eutrophic and 53% were obese. The adolescents were classified as somewhat active according to the average number of daily steps. The DLW-derived TDEE and the TDEE derived from the 2005 and the 2023 predictive equations are presented as means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The 2005 and 2023 DRI equations produced significantly higher values than the DLW-determined TDEE (56.2% and 57.2%, respectively). Conclusion: Additional studies with Brazilian adolescents should be conducted to propose more accurate and specific predictive TDEE equations.","PeriodicalId":14325,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nutrition","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2379-7835.ijn-24-5155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ojective This report aimed to compare the total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) of adolescents measured by doubly labeled water (DLW) with the 2005 and 2023 dietary reference intake (DRI) equations proposed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in a sample of Brazilian adolescents. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional and observational study with a convenience sample of 15 obese and eutrophic adolescents, aged between 11 and 14 years, from public schools and the obesity outpatient clinic of the Clinics Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School – University of São Paulo (HC FMRP-USP) in Brazil. Were obtained stature and weight by conventional methods and used to calculate the body mass index (BMI) to determine the nutritional status. Fat-free mass (FFM) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Energy expenditure was determined by DLW and estimated by the 2005 and 2023 DRI equations. The level of physical activity was measured with the ActivPAL™ accelerometer to classify adolescents within the equations. Results: Forty-seven percent of the sample were eutrophic and 53% were obese. The adolescents were classified as somewhat active according to the average number of daily steps. The DLW-derived TDEE and the TDEE derived from the 2005 and the 2023 predictive equations are presented as means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The 2005 and 2023 DRI equations produced significantly higher values than the DLW-determined TDEE (56.2% and 57.2%, respectively). Conclusion: Additional studies with Brazilian adolescents should be conducted to propose more accurate and specific predictive TDEE equations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与双标水相比,巴西青少年样本的膳食参考摄入量方程高估了每日总能量消耗
目的:本报告旨在对巴西青少年样本中通过双标记水(DLW)测量的青少年每日总能量消耗(TDEE)与美国医学研究所(IOM)提出的 2005 年和 2023 年膳食参考摄入量(DRI)公式进行比较。研究方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,研究对象为巴西圣保罗大学里贝朗普雷图医学院附属医院肥胖症门诊(HC FMRP-USP)的15名肥胖和富营养化青少年,年龄在11至14岁之间。通过传统方法获得身材和体重,并计算体重指数(BMI),以确定营养状况。采用双能 X 射线吸收测量法测量了无脂质量(FFM)。能量消耗由 DLW 确定,并根据 2005 年和 2023 年 DRI 方程估算。使用 ActivPAL™ 加速度计测量体力活动水平,根据公式对青少年进行分类。结果:47%的样本为富营养化,53%为肥胖。根据每天的平均步数,青少年被归类为有一定运动量的人群。根据 DLW 得出的 TDEE 以及根据 2005 年和 2023 年预测方程得出的 TDEE 以均值、标准差和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示。2005 年和 2023 年 DRI 方程得出的数值明显高于 DLW 确定的 TDEE(分别为 56.2% 和 57.2%)。结论:应针对巴西青少年开展更多研究,以提出更准确、更具体的 TDEE 预测方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Total Daily Energy Expenditure is Overestimated by Dietary References Intake Equations Compared with Doubly Labeled Water in A Sample of Brazilian Adolescents The Effects of Dairy Consumption on Vaccine Immune Response and Immunoglobulins: A Systematic Literature Review The Effects of Dairy Consumption on Vaccine Immune Response and Immunoglobulins: A Systematic Literature Review Scrutinizing Local Probiotic Supplements and Drinks Available in the Bangladesh Market Acute Effects of White Button and Shiitake Mushroom Powder Supplementation on Postprandial Lipemia and Glycemia Following a High-Fat Meal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1