{"title":"Effects of Exercise on the Inter-Session Accuracy of sEMG-Based Hand Gesture Recognition","authors":"Xiangyu Liu, Chenyun Dai, Jionghui Liu, Yangyang Yuan","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11080811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface electromyography (sEMG) is commonly used as an interface in human–machine interaction systems due to their high signal-to-noise ratio and easy acquisition. It can intuitively reflect motion intentions of users, thus is widely applied in gesture recognition systems. However, wearable sEMG-based gesture recognition systems are susceptible to changes in environmental noise, electrode placement, and physiological characteristics. This could result in significant performance degradation of the model in inter-session scenarios, bringing a poor experience to users. Currently, for noise from environmental changes and electrode shifting from wearing variety, numerous studies have proposed various data-augmentation methods and highly generalized networks to improve inter-session gesture recognition accuracy. However, few studies have considered the impact of individual physiological states. In this study, we assumed that user exercise could cause changes in muscle conditions, leading to variations in sEMG features and subsequently affecting the recognition accuracy of model. To verify our hypothesis, we collected sEMG data from 12 participants performing the same gesture tasks before and after exercise, and then used Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) for gesture classification. For the non-exercise group, the inter-session accuracy declined only by 2.86%, whereas that of the exercise group decreased by 13.53%. This finding proves that exercise is indeed a critical factor contributing to the decline in inter-session model performance.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is commonly used as an interface in human–machine interaction systems due to their high signal-to-noise ratio and easy acquisition. It can intuitively reflect motion intentions of users, thus is widely applied in gesture recognition systems. However, wearable sEMG-based gesture recognition systems are susceptible to changes in environmental noise, electrode placement, and physiological characteristics. This could result in significant performance degradation of the model in inter-session scenarios, bringing a poor experience to users. Currently, for noise from environmental changes and electrode shifting from wearing variety, numerous studies have proposed various data-augmentation methods and highly generalized networks to improve inter-session gesture recognition accuracy. However, few studies have considered the impact of individual physiological states. In this study, we assumed that user exercise could cause changes in muscle conditions, leading to variations in sEMG features and subsequently affecting the recognition accuracy of model. To verify our hypothesis, we collected sEMG data from 12 participants performing the same gesture tasks before and after exercise, and then used Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) for gesture classification. For the non-exercise group, the inter-session accuracy declined only by 2.86%, whereas that of the exercise group decreased by 13.53%. This finding proves that exercise is indeed a critical factor contributing to the decline in inter-session model performance.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering