Apology Strategies Used by Native Speakers of Kabyle

Lamia Dahmani, Eman Al Khalaf
{"title":"Apology Strategies Used by Native Speakers of Kabyle","authors":"Lamia Dahmani, Eman Al Khalaf","doi":"10.17507/tpls.1408.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigates the strategies of apology used by 30 native speakers of Kabyle (15 males and 15 females) living in Bejaia city, Algeria. The data were collected through the use of a written discourse completion task (WDCT) consisting of nine hypothetical scenarios. The results of the study showed that Kabyles used different types of strategies. Illocutionary force indicating devices (IFIDs) were the most frequently used strategy. Concern for the hearer, however, was the least frequently used strategy. Moreover, new strategies appeared in the Kabyle data. Examples of these include asking the hearer not to be angry, requests for patience, religious wishes and minimizing the degree of the offense. These semantic formulas are culture-specific. Furthermore, the findings of the study indicated that there were differences in the total number of strategies employed according to the social status of the interlocutor and in the choice of some apology strategies.","PeriodicalId":23004,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the strategies of apology used by 30 native speakers of Kabyle (15 males and 15 females) living in Bejaia city, Algeria. The data were collected through the use of a written discourse completion task (WDCT) consisting of nine hypothetical scenarios. The results of the study showed that Kabyles used different types of strategies. Illocutionary force indicating devices (IFIDs) were the most frequently used strategy. Concern for the hearer, however, was the least frequently used strategy. Moreover, new strategies appeared in the Kabyle data. Examples of these include asking the hearer not to be angry, requests for patience, religious wishes and minimizing the degree of the offense. These semantic formulas are culture-specific. Furthermore, the findings of the study indicated that there were differences in the total number of strategies employed according to the social status of the interlocutor and in the choice of some apology strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母语为卡比尔语的人使用的道歉策略
本研究调查了居住在阿尔及利亚贝贾亚市的 30 位以卡比尔语为母语的人士(15 男 15 女)所使用的道歉策略。数据是通过书面话语完成任务(WDCT)收集的,其中包括九个假设情景。研究结果表明,卡比尔人使用了不同类型的策略。说明力指示装置(IFID)是最常用的策略。而对听者的关注则是使用频率最低的策略。此外,卡拜尔语数据中还出现了一些新策略。例如,要求听话人不要生气、请求耐心、宗教愿望和尽量减少冒犯的程度。这些语义公式具有特定的文化背景。此外,研究结果表明,对话者的社会地位不同,所使用的策略总数也不同,对某些道歉策略的选择也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnolinguistic Study of Marine Fishes’ Characters of the Biak Tribe, Papua Examining the Impact of Tanzania's Language Policy in Education on Promoting the Chinese Language in Tanzania A Comprehensive Study of Business Writing Competence Among Business Management Students at Techno Link College, Ethiopia Muslim Identity Fluidities and Ambiguities: A Focus on Mohsin Hamid's The Reluctant Fundamentalist and Elif Shafak's The Forty Rules of Love The Development of Blended Learning Model Combined With Project-Based Learning Model in Indonesian Students’ Scientific Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1