{"title":"Intratumoral Chemotherapy: The Effects of Drug Concentration and Dose Apportioning on Tumor Cell Injury","authors":"J.S. Warner, C. Kinsey, J. Bates, Vitor Mori","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11080809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The addition of intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy to i.v. immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer results in improved overall survival but is limited by synergistic side effects and an unknown, highly variable final cytotoxic dose within the tumor. The synergy between i.v. chemo- and immunotherapies is hypothesized to occur as a result of cell injury caused by chemotherapy, a mechanism demonstrated to drive antigen presentation within the tumor microenvironment. Intratumoral delivery of chemotherapy may thus be optimized to maximize tumor cell injury. To assess the balance between the damage versus the death of tumor cells, we developed a computational model of intratumoral dynamics within a lung cancer tumor for three different chemotherapy agents following direct injection as a function of location and number of injection sites. We based the model on the morphology of a lung tumor obtained from a thoracic CT scan. We found no meaningful difference in the extent of tumor cell damage between a centrally injected versus peripherally injected agent, but there were significant differences between a single injection versus when the total dose was apportioned between multiple injection sites. Importantly, we also found that the standard chemotherapeutic concentrations used for intravenous administration were effective at causing cell death but were too high to generate significant cell injury. This suggests that to induce maximal tumor cell injury, the optimal concentration should be several orders of magnitude lower than those typically used for intravenous therapy.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The addition of intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy to i.v. immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer results in improved overall survival but is limited by synergistic side effects and an unknown, highly variable final cytotoxic dose within the tumor. The synergy between i.v. chemo- and immunotherapies is hypothesized to occur as a result of cell injury caused by chemotherapy, a mechanism demonstrated to drive antigen presentation within the tumor microenvironment. Intratumoral delivery of chemotherapy may thus be optimized to maximize tumor cell injury. To assess the balance between the damage versus the death of tumor cells, we developed a computational model of intratumoral dynamics within a lung cancer tumor for three different chemotherapy agents following direct injection as a function of location and number of injection sites. We based the model on the morphology of a lung tumor obtained from a thoracic CT scan. We found no meaningful difference in the extent of tumor cell damage between a centrally injected versus peripherally injected agent, but there were significant differences between a single injection versus when the total dose was apportioned between multiple injection sites. Importantly, we also found that the standard chemotherapeutic concentrations used for intravenous administration were effective at causing cell death but were too high to generate significant cell injury. This suggests that to induce maximal tumor cell injury, the optimal concentration should be several orders of magnitude lower than those typically used for intravenous therapy.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering