Patients’ perspectives on cancer care disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: experiencing taboos, misinformation and barriers in the healthcare system

Veronica Coppini, Giulia Ferraris, Maria Vittoria Ferrari, Margherita Dahò, Iva Kirac, Ira Renko, Dario Monzani, R. Grasso, Gabriella Pravettoni
{"title":"Patients’ perspectives on cancer care disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: experiencing taboos, misinformation and barriers in the healthcare system","authors":"Veronica Coppini, Giulia Ferraris, Maria Vittoria Ferrari, Margherita Dahò, Iva Kirac, Ira Renko, Dario Monzani, R. Grasso, Gabriella Pravettoni","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1420178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the advancements in oncological medicine and research, cancer remains the second leading cause of death in Europe with Central and Eastern European countries, such as Slovakia and Croatia, showing the highest mortality rates and disparities in access to appropriate and comprehensive cancer care. Therefore, the primary aim of the current study is to investigate cancer patients’ perspectives and experiences to understand the possible underlying reasons for cancer disparities.Croatian cancer patients (n=15) and Slovak patients (n=11) were recruited through social media platforms, patients’ organisations, and hospital websites and offered participation in online focus group discussions on perceived disparities, barriers or malfunctioning during and after their cancer journey. Transcripts of video and audio recordings of the interviews were translated and analysed using Thematic analysis.Six Croatian and five Slovak themes emerged from the focus group discussions highlighting encountered barriers and perceived disparities, as well as suggestions or unmet needs. Most of the themes are common to both groups, such as the lack of information and use of the internet, and the taboos regarding cancer or psycho-oncological support. However, some themes are specific to each group, for instance, Slovak cancer patients remarked the fact that they do not mind travelling to get treatment as long as they can be treated in the west of Slovakia, while Croatian patients highlighted the need for more information after the illness and the socioeconomic impact deriving from a cancer diagnosis.Urgent intervention is needed in addressing disparities in Central and Eastern Europe. Present results could inform dedicated guidelines or better resource allocation strategies to reduce disparities in cancer care and promote inclusive healthcare.","PeriodicalId":507440,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1420178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the advancements in oncological medicine and research, cancer remains the second leading cause of death in Europe with Central and Eastern European countries, such as Slovakia and Croatia, showing the highest mortality rates and disparities in access to appropriate and comprehensive cancer care. Therefore, the primary aim of the current study is to investigate cancer patients’ perspectives and experiences to understand the possible underlying reasons for cancer disparities.Croatian cancer patients (n=15) and Slovak patients (n=11) were recruited through social media platforms, patients’ organisations, and hospital websites and offered participation in online focus group discussions on perceived disparities, barriers or malfunctioning during and after their cancer journey. Transcripts of video and audio recordings of the interviews were translated and analysed using Thematic analysis.Six Croatian and five Slovak themes emerged from the focus group discussions highlighting encountered barriers and perceived disparities, as well as suggestions or unmet needs. Most of the themes are common to both groups, such as the lack of information and use of the internet, and the taboos regarding cancer or psycho-oncological support. However, some themes are specific to each group, for instance, Slovak cancer patients remarked the fact that they do not mind travelling to get treatment as long as they can be treated in the west of Slovakia, while Croatian patients highlighted the need for more information after the illness and the socioeconomic impact deriving from a cancer diagnosis.Urgent intervention is needed in addressing disparities in Central and Eastern Europe. Present results could inform dedicated guidelines or better resource allocation strategies to reduce disparities in cancer care and promote inclusive healthcare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧和东欧国家患者对癌症护理差异的看法:经历医疗保健系统中的禁忌、误导和障碍
尽管肿瘤医学和研究取得了进步,但癌症仍是欧洲第二大死因,斯洛伐克和克罗地亚等中东欧国家的死亡率最高,在获得适当和全面的癌症护理方面也存在差异。克罗地亚癌症患者(15 人)和斯洛伐克癌症患者(11 人)通过社交媒体平台、患者组织和医院网站被招募,并参加了在线焦点小组讨论,讨论他们在癌症治疗过程中和治疗后感知到的差异、障碍或故障。焦点小组讨论中出现了六个克罗地亚主题和五个斯洛伐克主题,强调了遇到的障碍和感知到的差异,以及建议或未满足的需求。大部分主题是两个群体共有的,例如缺乏信息和互联网的使用,以及有关癌症或肿瘤心理支持的禁忌。然而,有些主题是每个群体所特有的,例如,斯洛伐克癌症患者表示,只要能在斯洛伐克西部接受治疗,他们并不介意长途跋涉去接受治疗;而克罗地亚患者则强调,在患病后需要获得更多信息,以及癌症诊断对社会经济的影响。目前的研究结果可以为专门的指南或更好的资源分配战略提供参考,以减少癌症治疗中的差异,促进包容性医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical experience with adaptive MRI-guided pancreatic SBRT and the use of abdominal compression to reduce treatment volume Frequency of pathogenic germline variants in pediatric medulloblastoma survivors Long segment ureterectomy with tapered demucosalized ileum replacement of ureter for ureteral cancer: a case report and literature review Application of λ esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy under laparoscopy: a modified technique for post-gastrectomy reconstruction Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1