Perceived indoor environment and exacerbations of COPD and asthma – a cohort study between 2000-2018

Stine Kloster, Jørgen Vestbo, Michael Davidsen, Anne Illemann Christensen, Niss Skov Nielsen, Lars Gunnarsen, Annette Kjær Ersbøll
{"title":"Perceived indoor environment and exacerbations of COPD and asthma – a cohort study between 2000-2018","authors":"Stine Kloster, Jørgen Vestbo, Michael Davidsen, Anne Illemann Christensen, Niss Skov Nielsen, Lars Gunnarsen, Annette Kjær Ersbøll","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d3c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Ambient air pollution has been associated with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma; however, little is known about indoor environmental factors. Our aim was to study the association between perceived indoor environment and the long-term risk of exacerbations of COPD or asthma. Methods: We followed 2,317 individuals aged ≥16 years with COPD or asthma from the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey from 2000 to 2018. Individuals developing COPD or asthma during the study period were included at the time of incident diagnosis. Individuals were grouped according to their patterns of perceived indoor environment and followed up for exacerbations defined based on information from the Danish National Health Registers. The association between perceived indoor environment and exacerbations was examined using a generalized mixed model with the Poisson distribution of the number of exacerbations and logarithmic transformation of follow-up time as offset. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, household income, smoking, calendar year, construction year, urbanization, home ownership, and resident density. Results: A total of 5,352 exacerbations were recorded in 2,317 individuals during a median of 13.9 years (interquartile range, 7.9-18.2 years). The adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of exacerbations were 1.40 (95% CI 0.85-2.29 and 0.82 (95% CI 0.49-1.38) among individuals with medium and high levels om annoyances, respectively. For annoyances related to temperature and traffic the IRR was 0.88 (95% CI 0.61-1.27) and 1.39 (95% CI 0.88-2.19), respectively. Conclusion: We found no association between indoor environment assessed as annoyances at a single time-point and exacerbations of COPD and asthma.","PeriodicalId":505267,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"90 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d3c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ambient air pollution has been associated with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma; however, little is known about indoor environmental factors. Our aim was to study the association between perceived indoor environment and the long-term risk of exacerbations of COPD or asthma. Methods: We followed 2,317 individuals aged ≥16 years with COPD or asthma from the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey from 2000 to 2018. Individuals developing COPD or asthma during the study period were included at the time of incident diagnosis. Individuals were grouped according to their patterns of perceived indoor environment and followed up for exacerbations defined based on information from the Danish National Health Registers. The association between perceived indoor environment and exacerbations was examined using a generalized mixed model with the Poisson distribution of the number of exacerbations and logarithmic transformation of follow-up time as offset. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, household income, smoking, calendar year, construction year, urbanization, home ownership, and resident density. Results: A total of 5,352 exacerbations were recorded in 2,317 individuals during a median of 13.9 years (interquartile range, 7.9-18.2 years). The adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of exacerbations were 1.40 (95% CI 0.85-2.29 and 0.82 (95% CI 0.49-1.38) among individuals with medium and high levels om annoyances, respectively. For annoyances related to temperature and traffic the IRR was 0.88 (95% CI 0.61-1.27) and 1.39 (95% CI 0.88-2.19), respectively. Conclusion: We found no association between indoor environment assessed as annoyances at a single time-point and exacerbations of COPD and asthma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知的室内环境与慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘的恶化--2000-2018 年间的一项队列研究
背景:环境空气污染与慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和哮喘的恶化有关;然而,人们对室内环境因素知之甚少。我们的目的是研究感知的室内环境与慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘恶化的长期风险之间的关系。研究方法我们对 2000 年至 2018 年期间丹麦健康和发病率调查中 2317 名年龄≥16 岁的慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘患者进行了跟踪调查。在研究期间罹患慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘的患者在事件诊断时被纳入研究范围。研究人员根据患者对室内环境的感知模式对其进行分组,并根据丹麦国家健康登记册的信息对患者的病情加重情况进行随访。研究采用了一个广义混合模型,以恶化次数的泊松分布和随访时间的对数变换作为偏移量,来检验感知的室内环境与病情恶化之间的关系。分析时对年龄、性别、教育程度、家庭收入、吸烟、日历年、建筑年、城市化程度、住房所有权和居民密度进行了调整。结果在中位数为 13.9 年(四分位数间距为 7.9-18.2 年)的时间里,2317 人共记录了 5352 次病情恶化。中度和高度恼怒者的调整后病情恶化发生率比(IRR)分别为 1.40(95% CI 0.85-2.29 )和 0.82(95% CI 0.49-1.38)。与温度和交通有关的恼怒的 IRR 分别为 0.88(95% CI 0.61-1.27)和 1.39(95% CI 0.88-2.19)。结论我们发现,在单个时间点以烦扰度评估的室内环境与慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘的恶化之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What factors influence individuals' willingness to pay for environmental protection: Evidence from CGSS2021 Unlocking bioremediation potential: harnessing an indigenous bacterial consortium from effluent treatment plants for industrial wastewater treatment Household Air Pollution Disparities Between Socioeconomic Groups in Chicago An integrated expert recommender system approach to environmental service priorities in renewable energy Climatic characteristics of centennial and extreme precipitation in Hangzhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1