Identification and Evaluation of Sustainable Factors in Urban Construction Project Management Using SWOT Technique

Nima Amani, Mahsima Naeij
{"title":"Identification and Evaluation of Sustainable Factors in Urban Construction Project Management Using SWOT Technique","authors":"Nima Amani, Mahsima Naeij","doi":"10.47852/bonviewglce42021909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to create a management framework for identifying and evaluating sustainable factors in construction project management through strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis, focusing on the Rasht urban. The research method in this study includes the four steps. Step 1: Identifying internal and external sustainable factors using the Delphi technique; Step 2: Designing an analytic hierarchy process and calculating the weights of internal and external factors using SPSS 26 software; Step 3: Creating the internal factor and external factor evaluation and determining the final weights; Step 4: Model design and the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Quantitative strategic planning matrix analysis has been used to prioritize and identify the attractiveness of each of the designed strategies. By forming a quantitative strategic planning matrix, the existing twelve strategies have been prioritized. Based on the quantitative strategic planning matrix analysis, the priority of strategy selection includes: 1) The scenario of the construction of resistant infrastructure and creating the necessary regulations to strengthen and support construction projects with a score of 1.94 was ranked first. 2) The scenario of applying creativity and human resources experience to increase the productivity of construction projects with a score of 1.90 was ranked second. 3) The scenario of human resource training in order to enhance the expertise in the construction management complex with a score of 1.89 was ranked third. In this study, sustainable factors have been evaluated very accurately through quantitative strategic planning matrix, which has not been done more research so far. The study recommends implementing strength-opportunities (SO) strategies to improve construction projects in the Rasht urban area.","PeriodicalId":504488,"journal":{"name":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","volume":"46 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewglce42021909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to create a management framework for identifying and evaluating sustainable factors in construction project management through strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis, focusing on the Rasht urban. The research method in this study includes the four steps. Step 1: Identifying internal and external sustainable factors using the Delphi technique; Step 2: Designing an analytic hierarchy process and calculating the weights of internal and external factors using SPSS 26 software; Step 3: Creating the internal factor and external factor evaluation and determining the final weights; Step 4: Model design and the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Quantitative strategic planning matrix analysis has been used to prioritize and identify the attractiveness of each of the designed strategies. By forming a quantitative strategic planning matrix, the existing twelve strategies have been prioritized. Based on the quantitative strategic planning matrix analysis, the priority of strategy selection includes: 1) The scenario of the construction of resistant infrastructure and creating the necessary regulations to strengthen and support construction projects with a score of 1.94 was ranked first. 2) The scenario of applying creativity and human resources experience to increase the productivity of construction projects with a score of 1.90 was ranked second. 3) The scenario of human resource training in order to enhance the expertise in the construction management complex with a score of 1.89 was ranked third. In this study, sustainable factors have been evaluated very accurately through quantitative strategic planning matrix, which has not been done more research so far. The study recommends implementing strength-opportunities (SO) strategies to improve construction projects in the Rasht urban area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 SWOT 技术识别和评估城市建设项目管理中的可持续因素
本研究旨在创建一个管理框架,通过优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析,识别和评估建筑项目管理中的可持续因素,重点关注拉什特城市。本研究的研究方法包括四个步骤。第 1 步:使用德尔菲技术识别内部和外部可持续因素;第 2 步:设计分析层次过程,并使用 SPSS 26 软件计算内部和外部因素的权重;第 3 步:创建内部因素和外部因素评价,并确定最终权重;第 4 步:模型设计以及优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析。定量战略规划矩阵分析被用来确定每项设计战略的优先次序和吸引力。通过形成定量战略规划矩阵,对现有的十二项战略进行了优先排序。根据定量战略规划矩阵分析,战略选择的优先顺序包括1) 建设具有抵抗力的基础设施和制定必要的法规以加强和支持建设项目的方案得分为 1.94,排在第一位。2) 运用创造力和人力资源经验提高建筑项目生产率的方案,得分为 1.90,排名第二。3) 为提高建筑管理综合体的专业技能而进行人力资源培训的方案得分为 1.89,排名第三。在本研究中,通过量化战略规划矩阵对可持续因素进行了非常准确的评估,迄今为止还没有进行过更多的研究。研究建议实施优势-机会(SO)战略,以改善拉什特城区的建筑项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identification and Evaluation of Sustainable Factors in Urban Construction Project Management Using SWOT Technique Inner Areas and Green Economy in Campania Region: The Carditello Royal Borbonic Site Case Study Carbon Cycle Models Quantify for a Green and Low-Carbon Economy Analysis of Electric Power Transmission Lines Through Graph Theory: Protecting Environmental Preservation Areas Through Strategic Planning Impact of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Tax on India and other trading partners of EU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1