Leveraging design of experiments to build chemometric models for the quantification of uranium (VI) and HNO3 by Raman spectroscopy

Luke R. Sadergaski, Jeffrey D. Einkauf, L. Delmau, Jonathan D. Burns
{"title":"Leveraging design of experiments to build chemometric models for the quantification of uranium (VI) and HNO3 by Raman spectroscopy","authors":"Luke R. Sadergaski, Jeffrey D. Einkauf, L. Delmau, Jonathan D. Burns","doi":"10.3389/fnuen.2024.1411840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector regression (SVR) models were optimized for the quantification of U(VI) (10–320 g L−1) and HNO3 (0.6–6 M) by Raman spectroscopy with optimized calibration sets chosen by optimal design of experiments. The designed approach effectively minimized the number of samples in the calibration set for PLSR and SVR by selecting sample concentrations with a quadratic process model, despite complex confounding and covarying spectral features in the spectra. The top PLS2 model resulted in percent root mean square errors of prediction for U(VI), HNO3, and NO3− of 3.7%, 3.6%, and 2.9%, respectively. PLS1 models performed similarly despite modeling an analyte with a majority linear response (i.e., uranyl symmetric stretch) and another with more covarying vibrational modes (i.e., HNO3). Partial least squares (PLS) model loadings and regression coefficients were evaluated to better understand the relationship between weaker Raman bands and covarying spectral features. Support vector machine models outperformed PLS1 models, resulting in percent root mean square error of prediction values for U(VI) and HNO3 of 1.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The optimal nonlinear SVR model was trained using a similar number of samples (11) compared with the PLSR model, even though PLS is a linear modeling approach. The generic D-optimal design presented in this work provides a robust statistical framework for selecting training set samples in disparate two-factor systems. This approach reinforces Raman spectroscopy for the quantification of species relevant to the nuclear fuel cycle and provides a robust chemometric modeling approach to bolster online monitoring in challenging process environments.","PeriodicalId":505786,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnuen.2024.1411840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector regression (SVR) models were optimized for the quantification of U(VI) (10–320 g L−1) and HNO3 (0.6–6 M) by Raman spectroscopy with optimized calibration sets chosen by optimal design of experiments. The designed approach effectively minimized the number of samples in the calibration set for PLSR and SVR by selecting sample concentrations with a quadratic process model, despite complex confounding and covarying spectral features in the spectra. The top PLS2 model resulted in percent root mean square errors of prediction for U(VI), HNO3, and NO3− of 3.7%, 3.6%, and 2.9%, respectively. PLS1 models performed similarly despite modeling an analyte with a majority linear response (i.e., uranyl symmetric stretch) and another with more covarying vibrational modes (i.e., HNO3). Partial least squares (PLS) model loadings and regression coefficients were evaluated to better understand the relationship between weaker Raman bands and covarying spectral features. Support vector machine models outperformed PLS1 models, resulting in percent root mean square error of prediction values for U(VI) and HNO3 of 1.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The optimal nonlinear SVR model was trained using a similar number of samples (11) compared with the PLSR model, even though PLS is a linear modeling approach. The generic D-optimal design presented in this work provides a robust statistical framework for selecting training set samples in disparate two-factor systems. This approach reinforces Raman spectroscopy for the quantification of species relevant to the nuclear fuel cycle and provides a robust chemometric modeling approach to bolster online monitoring in challenging process environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用实验设计建立拉曼光谱定量铀 (VI) 和 HNO3 的化学计量模型
通过优化实验设计选择优化校准集,优化了部分最小二乘回归(PLSR)和支持向量回归(SVR)模型,用于拉曼光谱法定量分析 U(VI)(10-320 g L-1)和 HNO3(0.6-6 M)。尽管光谱中存在复杂的混杂和共变光谱特征,但所设计的方法通过使用二次过程模型选择样品浓度,有效地减少了 PLSR 和 SVR 校准集中的样品数量。顶级 PLS2 模型对 U(VI)、HNO3 和 NO3- 预测的均方根误差分别为 3.7%、3.6% 和 2.9%。PLS1 模型的表现类似,尽管所模拟的分析物具有大多数线性响应(即铀酰对称伸展)和另一种具有更多共变振动模式的分析物(即 HNO3)。对偏最小二乘法(PLS)模型载荷和回归系数进行了评估,以更好地了解较弱拉曼光谱带与共变光谱特征之间的关系。支持向量机模型的性能优于 PLS1 模型,对 U(VI) 和 HNO3 预测值的均方根误差分别为 1.5% 和 3.1%。尽管 PLS 是一种线性建模方法,但与 PLSR 模型相比,最佳非线性 SVR 模型使用了相似的样本数(11 个)进行训练。这项工作中提出的通用 D-优化设计为在不同的双因素系统中选择训练集样本提供了一个稳健的统计框架。这种方法加强了拉曼光谱对核燃料循环相关物种的定量分析,并提供了一种稳健的化学计量建模方法,以支持在具有挑战性的过程环境中进行在线监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leveraging design of experiments to build chemometric models for the quantification of uranium (VI) and HNO3 by Raman spectroscopy Concept validation of separations for thorium-based radionuclide generator systems for medical application Ab-initio molecular dynamics study of eutectic chloride salt: MgCl2–NaCl–KCl Demonstrating autonomous controls on hardware test beds is a necessity for successful missions to Mars and beyond WP15 ConCorD state-of-the-art report (container corrosion under disposal conditions)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1