A Comparison of the Plyometric Performance of Upper Limbs between Experienced and Non-Experienced Athletes

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.3390/sports12080217
Sylvain Dhote, Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre
{"title":"A Comparison of the Plyometric Performance of Upper Limbs between Experienced and Non-Experienced Athletes","authors":"Sylvain Dhote, Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre","doi":"10.3390/sports12080217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although explosive upper-limb movements are far less studied than the equivalent lower-limb movements, they are important in many sports activities. The goal of this study was to explore, for the first time, the performance of street workout (SW) athletes who primarily focus on explosive and isometric strength in the upper limbs and to examine the effect of the contraction type on performance during a classical upper-body movement. Eighteen men took part in this study (age: 22.6 ± 2.1 years, height: 179.6 ± 7.1 cm, bodyweight: 71.9 ± 6.6 kg). Of these, nine practiced SW and nine practiced various team and individual sports—the latter serving as the control group. The athletes performed three different types of push-ups—one in a concentric way and two others in a plyometric way—and a fatigue-inducing push-up set. Jump heights, myoelectrical activities (through electromyography), muscle architecture, and hypertrophy (through ultrasonography) were measured. The results show no significant differences in jump height between the push-up types. Both groups confounded, but the SW athletes jumped on average 66 ± 21% higher than the control athletes (p < 0.05). There was no major difference in EMG between groups, regardless of the push-up type, but the SW athletes had a greater pectoralis major and anterior deltoid thickness as well as a greater pennation angle of the pectoralis major. The results suggest that the plyometric performance of the upper limbs does not follow the same pattern as that of the lower limbs. The SW group’s greater capacity in performing explosive push-ups could be attributed to greater upper-body muscle hypertrophy and more efficient execution of the movement.","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12080217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although explosive upper-limb movements are far less studied than the equivalent lower-limb movements, they are important in many sports activities. The goal of this study was to explore, for the first time, the performance of street workout (SW) athletes who primarily focus on explosive and isometric strength in the upper limbs and to examine the effect of the contraction type on performance during a classical upper-body movement. Eighteen men took part in this study (age: 22.6 ± 2.1 years, height: 179.6 ± 7.1 cm, bodyweight: 71.9 ± 6.6 kg). Of these, nine practiced SW and nine practiced various team and individual sports—the latter serving as the control group. The athletes performed three different types of push-ups—one in a concentric way and two others in a plyometric way—and a fatigue-inducing push-up set. Jump heights, myoelectrical activities (through electromyography), muscle architecture, and hypertrophy (through ultrasonography) were measured. The results show no significant differences in jump height between the push-up types. Both groups confounded, but the SW athletes jumped on average 66 ± 21% higher than the control athletes (p < 0.05). There was no major difference in EMG between groups, regardless of the push-up type, but the SW athletes had a greater pectoralis major and anterior deltoid thickness as well as a greater pennation angle of the pectoralis major. The results suggest that the plyometric performance of the upper limbs does not follow the same pattern as that of the lower limbs. The SW group’s greater capacity in performing explosive push-ups could be attributed to greater upper-body muscle hypertrophy and more efficient execution of the movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有经验和无经验运动员上肢负重能力的比较
虽然对上肢爆发力运动的研究远不及对下肢爆发力运动的研究,但它们在许多体育活动中都非常重要。本研究的目的是首次探索街头锻炼(SW)运动员的表现,他们主要侧重于上肢的爆发力和等长力量,并研究收缩类型对经典上肢动作表现的影响。18 名男子参加了此次研究(年龄:22.6 ± 2.1 岁;身高:179.6 ± 7.1 厘米;体重:71.9 ± 6.6 千克)。其中,9 人练习 SW,9 人练习各种团队和个人运动,后者作为对照组。运动员们做了三种不同类型的俯卧撑--一种是同心俯卧撑,另两种是负重俯卧撑--以及一组疲劳诱导俯卧撑。对跳跃高度、肌电活动(通过肌电图)、肌肉结构和肥大(通过超声波)进行了测量。结果显示,俯卧撑类型之间的跳跃高度没有明显差异。两组运动员都有混淆,但 SW 组运动员的平均跳高比对照组运动员高 66 ± 21%(p < 0.05)。无论俯卧撑类型如何,各组之间的肌电图没有重大差异,但 SW 组运动员的胸大肌和三角肌前部厚度更大,胸大肌的垂尾角更大。结果表明,上肢的负重能力与下肢的负重能力并不相同。SW 组在做爆发力俯卧撑时能力更强,这可能是因为他们的上半身肌肉更肥厚,做起动作来更有效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anthropometric Profile and Position-Specific Changes in Segmental Body Composition of Professional Football Players Throughout a Training Period. Effects of Maturation on Plantar Flexor Activity and Achilles Tendon Stiffness in Vertical Jumping: Sex Differences. Oxygenation Kinetics of Three Quadriceps Muscles During Squatting Exercise in Trained Men. Rebuilding Stability: Exploring the Best Rehabilitation Methods for Chronic Ankle Instability. Analysing the Relation between Passion, Motivation, and Subjective Well-Being in Sport: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1