Generating fuel consumption maps on prescribed fire experiments from airborne laser scanning

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY International Journal of Wildland Fire Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1071/wf23160
T. Ryan McCarley, Andrew T. Hudak, Benjamin C. Bright, James Cronan, Paige Eagle, Roger D. Ottmar, Adam C. Watts
{"title":"Generating fuel consumption maps on prescribed fire experiments from airborne laser scanning","authors":"T. Ryan McCarley, Andrew T. Hudak, Benjamin C. Bright, James Cronan, Paige Eagle, Roger D. Ottmar, Adam C. Watts","doi":"10.1071/wf23160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Background</strong><p>Characterisation of fuel consumption provides critical insights into fire behaviour, effects, and emissions. Stand-replacing prescribed fire experiments in central Utah offered an opportunity to generate consumption estimates in coordination with other research efforts.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>We sought to generate fuel consumption maps using pre- and post-fire airborne laser scanning (ALS) and ground measurements and to test the spatial transferability of the ALS-derived fuel models.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Using random forest (RF), we empirically modelled fuel load and estimated consumption from pre- and post-fire differences. We used cross-validation to assess RF model performance and test spatial transferability.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Consumption estimates for overstory fuels were more precise and accurate than for subcanopy fuels. Transferring RF models to provide consumption estimates in areas without ground training data resulted in loss of precision and accuracy.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Fuel consumption maps were produced and are available for researchers who collected coincident fire behaviour, effects, and emissions data. The precision and accuracy of these data vary by fuel type. Transferability of the models to novel areas depends on the user’s tolerance for error.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>This study fills a critical need in the broader set of research efforts linking fire behaviour, effects, and emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wf23160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Characterisation of fuel consumption provides critical insights into fire behaviour, effects, and emissions. Stand-replacing prescribed fire experiments in central Utah offered an opportunity to generate consumption estimates in coordination with other research efforts.

Aims

We sought to generate fuel consumption maps using pre- and post-fire airborne laser scanning (ALS) and ground measurements and to test the spatial transferability of the ALS-derived fuel models.

Methods

Using random forest (RF), we empirically modelled fuel load and estimated consumption from pre- and post-fire differences. We used cross-validation to assess RF model performance and test spatial transferability.

Key results

Consumption estimates for overstory fuels were more precise and accurate than for subcanopy fuels. Transferring RF models to provide consumption estimates in areas without ground training data resulted in loss of precision and accuracy.

Conclusions

Fuel consumption maps were produced and are available for researchers who collected coincident fire behaviour, effects, and emissions data. The precision and accuracy of these data vary by fuel type. Transferability of the models to novel areas depends on the user’s tolerance for error.

Implications

This study fills a critical need in the broader set of research efforts linking fire behaviour, effects, and emissions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过机载激光扫描生成处方火实验燃料消耗图
背景燃料消耗的特征为了解火灾行为、影响和排放提供了重要依据。犹他州中部的支架置换预设火灾实验为我们提供了一个与其他研究工作协调生成燃料消耗估计值的机会。目的我们试图利用火灾前后的机载激光扫描(ALS)和地面测量来生成燃料消耗图,并测试 ALS 衍生燃料模型的空间可转移性。方法我们利用随机森林(RF)对燃料负荷进行了经验建模,并根据火灾前后的差异估算了燃料消耗量。我们使用交叉验证来评估 RF 模型的性能并测试空间可转移性。主要结果上层燃料的消耗量估计值比树冠下燃料的消耗量估计值更精确、更准确。将射频模型转移到没有地面训练数据的地区以提供消耗估算,会导致精度和准确性的损失。结论制作了燃料消耗图,并提供给收集火灾行为、影响和排放数据的研究人员。这些数据的精度和准确性因燃料类型而异。能否将模型应用到新的地区取决于用户对误差的容忍度。影响这项研究满足了将火灾行为、影响和排放联系起来的更广泛研究工作的关键需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Wildland Fire publishes new and significant articles that advance basic and applied research concerning wildland fire. Published papers aim to assist in the understanding of the basic principles of fire as a process, its ecological impact at the stand level and the landscape level, modelling fire and its effects, as well as presenting information on how to effectively and efficiently manage fire. The journal has an international perspective, since wildland fire plays a major social, economic and ecological role around the globe. The International Journal of Wildland Fire is published on behalf of the International Association of Wildland Fire.
期刊最新文献
Cross-landscape fuel moisture differences impact simulated fire behaviour Blackout burning in dry conditions increases long-term fire severity risk Observations of wildfire spread dynamics in southern Australian grasslands Expanding our understanding of nitrogen dynamics after fire: how severe fire and aridity reduce ecosystem nitrogen retention Assessing changes in high-intensity fire events in south-eastern Australia using Fourier Transform Infra-red (FITR) spectroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1