The development of prosocial risk‐taking behavior: Mechanisms and opportunities

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Child Development Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/cdep.12525
Emma Armstrong‐Carter, Eva H. Telzer
{"title":"The development of prosocial risk‐taking behavior: Mechanisms and opportunities","authors":"Emma Armstrong‐Carter, Eva H. Telzer","doi":"10.1111/cdep.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many young people are inclined toward risk taking and also toward helping other people. <jats:italic>Prosocial risk taking</jats:italic> is a term that can describe different ways that youth provide significant instrumental and emotional support to family members, friends, and strangers, even when it involves a personal risk. In this article, we review research about different types of prosocial risk taking and highlight examples, emphasizing a developmental perspective by examining change across childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. Research to date suggests that young people are more likely to engage in prosocial risk taking when they are more tolerant of uncertainty, have greater sensation‐seeking, perspective‐taking, and empathy, and when they are motivated by reputational concerns. Individual differences in prosocial risk‐taking behavior depend on youth's access to opportunities to explore, practice, and experience positive social feedback. Providing opportunities for youth to direct their risk‐taking tendencies toward prosocial outlets may help minimize risks to their psychosocial health and promote individual and community well‐being.","PeriodicalId":150,"journal":{"name":"Child Development Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many young people are inclined toward risk taking and also toward helping other people. Prosocial risk taking is a term that can describe different ways that youth provide significant instrumental and emotional support to family members, friends, and strangers, even when it involves a personal risk. In this article, we review research about different types of prosocial risk taking and highlight examples, emphasizing a developmental perspective by examining change across childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. Research to date suggests that young people are more likely to engage in prosocial risk taking when they are more tolerant of uncertainty, have greater sensation‐seeking, perspective‐taking, and empathy, and when they are motivated by reputational concerns. Individual differences in prosocial risk‐taking behavior depend on youth's access to opportunities to explore, practice, and experience positive social feedback. Providing opportunities for youth to direct their risk‐taking tendencies toward prosocial outlets may help minimize risks to their psychosocial health and promote individual and community well‐being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲社会冒险行为的发展:机制与机遇
许多青少年倾向于冒险,也倾向于帮助他人。亲社会风险承担是一个术语,可以描述青少年为家庭成员、朋友和陌生人提供重要的工具和情感支持的不同方式,即使这涉及个人风险。在本文中,我们将回顾有关不同类型的亲社会风险承担的研究,并重点举例说明,通过研究儿童期、青春期和青年期的变化,强调发展的视角。迄今为止的研究表明,当年轻人对不确定性的容忍度更高,对感觉的追求、视角的把握和同理心更强,以及出于对声誉的考虑时,他们更有可能参与亲社会风险承担。亲社会冒险行为的个体差异取决于青少年是否有机会探索、实践和体验积极的社会反馈。为青少年提供机会,将他们的冒险倾向引向亲社会途径,可能有助于最大限度地降低他们的社会心理健康风险,促进个人和社区的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Development Perspectives
Child Development Perspectives PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Child Development Perspectives" mission is to provide accessible, synthetic reports that summarize emerging trends or conclusions within various domains of developmental research, and to encourage multidisciplinary and international dialogue on a variety of topics in the developmental sciences. Articles in the journal will include reviews, commentary, and groups of papers on a targeted issue. Manuscripts presenting new empirical data are not appropriate for this journal. Articles will be obtained through two sources: author-initiated submissions and invited articles or commentary. Potential contributors who have ideas about a set of three or four papers written from very different perspectives may contact the editor with their ideas for feedback.
期刊最新文献
Designing equity‐centered early learning assessments for today's young children Rethinking pubertal research: Embracing intersectionality The development of prosocial risk‐taking behavior: Mechanisms and opportunities The (in)effectiveness of training domain‐general skills to support early math knowledge The multifaceted nature of early vocabulary development: Connecting children's characteristics with parental input types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1