{"title":"High post-fledging survival and site persistence using mark-resight methodology for Oregon Vesper Sparrows in the Willamette Valley, Oregon","authors":"Bob Altman, Joel Geier, Sarah M. Rockwell","doi":"10.5751/ace-02706-190208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ecology of the post-fledging period for small passerine birds is one of the least known stages of the avian life cycle with high rates of mortality for many species. We examined post-fledging survival and site persistence of Oregon Vesper Sparrows (<em>Poocetes gramineus affinis</em>) based on extensive temporal and spatial implementation of mark-resight methodology in western Oregon, 2017–2021. Our analyses focused on a comparison of descriptive apparent survival estimates (i.e., return rates) uncorrected for detectability and modeled apparent survival estimates corrected for detectability using Program MARK. Modeled survival estimates were only slightly higher than descriptive survival estimates at three weeks (0.754 and 0.689), six weeks (0.659 and 0.617), and nine weeks (0.629 and 0.561). Both estimates were lowest at three weeks post-fledging (0.754 and 0.689), and higher in weeks 3–6 (0.874 and 0.897), and weeks 6–9 (0.954 and 0.893). The best supported model included an effect of fledgling age in weeks on survival probability, and additive effects of site, effort, and week of season on detection probability. There was a live resight during the post-fledging period of at least one bird from 94.9% of the successfully fledged nests. Site persistence greater than 50 days was 0.838. Mean site persistence was 78.1 days and longest site persistence for an individual bird was 115 days. Our results suggest that an extensive mark-resight effort can address detectability concerns and provide an approximation of true post-fledging survival estimates. Our post-fledging survival estimates are the highest reported for a grassland bird, and yet they contrast with the expectations of the methodology and the literature on post-fledging survival of grassland birds, which is mostly derived from radio-tracking methodology. These results along with recent meta-analyses from other researchers raise concerns about unreported and unknown but expected mortality in grassland nestlings and fledglings from additive predation due to radio-tracking attachments and devices.</p>\n<p>The post High post-fledging survival and site persistence using mark-resight methodology for Oregon Vesper Sparrows in the Willamette Valley, Oregon first appeared on Avian Conservation and Ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49233,"journal":{"name":"Avian Conservation and Ecology","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Conservation and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-02706-190208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ecology of the post-fledging period for small passerine birds is one of the least known stages of the avian life cycle with high rates of mortality for many species. We examined post-fledging survival and site persistence of Oregon Vesper Sparrows (Poocetes gramineus affinis) based on extensive temporal and spatial implementation of mark-resight methodology in western Oregon, 2017–2021. Our analyses focused on a comparison of descriptive apparent survival estimates (i.e., return rates) uncorrected for detectability and modeled apparent survival estimates corrected for detectability using Program MARK. Modeled survival estimates were only slightly higher than descriptive survival estimates at three weeks (0.754 and 0.689), six weeks (0.659 and 0.617), and nine weeks (0.629 and 0.561). Both estimates were lowest at three weeks post-fledging (0.754 and 0.689), and higher in weeks 3–6 (0.874 and 0.897), and weeks 6–9 (0.954 and 0.893). The best supported model included an effect of fledgling age in weeks on survival probability, and additive effects of site, effort, and week of season on detection probability. There was a live resight during the post-fledging period of at least one bird from 94.9% of the successfully fledged nests. Site persistence greater than 50 days was 0.838. Mean site persistence was 78.1 days and longest site persistence for an individual bird was 115 days. Our results suggest that an extensive mark-resight effort can address detectability concerns and provide an approximation of true post-fledging survival estimates. Our post-fledging survival estimates are the highest reported for a grassland bird, and yet they contrast with the expectations of the methodology and the literature on post-fledging survival of grassland birds, which is mostly derived from radio-tracking methodology. These results along with recent meta-analyses from other researchers raise concerns about unreported and unknown but expected mortality in grassland nestlings and fledglings from additive predation due to radio-tracking attachments and devices.
The post High post-fledging survival and site persistence using mark-resight methodology for Oregon Vesper Sparrows in the Willamette Valley, Oregon first appeared on Avian Conservation and Ecology.
期刊介绍:
Avian Conservation and Ecology is an open-access, fully electronic scientific journal, sponsored by the Society of Canadian Ornithologists and Birds Canada. We publish papers that are scientifically rigorous and relevant to the bird conservation community in a cost-effective electronic approach that makes them freely available to scientists and the public in real-time. ACE is a fully indexed ISSN journal that welcomes contributions from scientists all over the world.
While the name of the journal implies a publication niche of conservation AND ecology, we think the theme of conservation THROUGH ecology provides a better sense of our purpose. As such, we are particularly interested in contributions that use a scientifically sound and rigorous approach to the achievement of avian conservation as revealed through insights into ecological principles and processes. Papers are expected to fall along a continuum of pure conservation and management at one end to more pure ecology at the other but our emphasis will be on those contributions with direct relevance to conservation objectives.