Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Brain Metastasis

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31080340
Naoko Ishida, Yukinori Matsuo, Junki Fukuda, Aritoshi Ri, Saori Tatsuno, Takuya Uehara, Masahiro Inada, Tomohiro Matsuura, Hiroshi Doi, Kiyoshi Nakamatsu, Makoto Hosono
{"title":"Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Brain Metastasis","authors":"Naoko Ishida, Yukinori Matsuo, Junki Fukuda, Aritoshi Ri, Saori Tatsuno, Takuya Uehara, Masahiro Inada, Tomohiro Matsuura, Hiroshi Doi, Kiyoshi Nakamatsu, Makoto Hosono","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Differences in radiation-induced lymphopenia and prognosis between methods of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases remain unclear. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) data were obtained within 2 weeks before RT initiation. Follow-up TLC data were evaluated at 0–2, 2–4, and 4–8 weeks after RT completion. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as < 800/μL at any time point. Results: Overall, 138 RT courses in 128 patients were eligible (94 WBRT; 44 SRS/SRT). In the WBRT courses, the median baseline TLC was 1325/μL (IQR: 923–1799). Follow-up TLC decreased significantly to 946/μL (626–1316), 992/μL (675–1291), and 1075/μL (762–1435) (p < 0.001). SRS/SRT courses showed no significant TLC decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex, prior RT, baseline TLC < 800/μL, and WBRT use were significantly associated with persistent lymphopenia. In the WBRT group, overall survival was significantly different between those with and without persistent lymphopenia (median, 2.6 and 6.1 months; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in survival in the SRS/SRT group (p = 0.60). Conclusion: This study suggests SRS/SRT might be preferable for lymphocyte preservation in brain metastasis patients.","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in radiation-induced lymphopenia and prognosis between methods of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases remain unclear. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) data were obtained within 2 weeks before RT initiation. Follow-up TLC data were evaluated at 0–2, 2–4, and 4–8 weeks after RT completion. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as < 800/μL at any time point. Results: Overall, 138 RT courses in 128 patients were eligible (94 WBRT; 44 SRS/SRT). In the WBRT courses, the median baseline TLC was 1325/μL (IQR: 923–1799). Follow-up TLC decreased significantly to 946/μL (626–1316), 992/μL (675–1291), and 1075/μL (762–1435) (p < 0.001). SRS/SRT courses showed no significant TLC decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex, prior RT, baseline TLC < 800/μL, and WBRT use were significantly associated with persistent lymphopenia. In the WBRT group, overall survival was significantly different between those with and without persistent lymphopenia (median, 2.6 and 6.1 months; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in survival in the SRS/SRT group (p = 0.60). Conclusion: This study suggests SRS/SRT might be preferable for lymphocyte preservation in brain metastasis patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射诱导的淋巴细胞减少症及其对脑转移患者生存期的影响
背景:治疗脑转移瘤的放射治疗(RT)方法在放射诱导的淋巴细胞减少症和预后方面的差异仍不清楚。方法:对接受全脑放射治疗的患者进行回顾性分析:在这项对接受全脑放疗(WBRT)或立体定向放射手术/放疗(SRS/SRT)治疗脑转移瘤的患者进行的回顾性分析中,基线总淋巴细胞计数(TLC)数据是在放疗开始前两周内获得的。在 RT 结束后的 0-2、2-4 和 4-8 周评估随访 TLC 数据。在任何时间点淋巴细胞计数小于 800/μL 即为持续性淋巴细胞减少症。结果:共有 128 名患者的 138 个 RT 疗程符合条件(94 个 WBRT 疗程;44 个 SRS/SRT)。在WBRT疗程中,基线TLC中位数为1325/μL(IQR:923-1799)。随访TLC明显降低至946/μL (626-1316)、992/μL (675-1291)和1075/μL (762-1435)(p < 0.001)。SRS/SRT疗程未显示TLC显著下降。多变量分析显示,女性性别、既往接受过 RT、基线 TLC < 800/μL 和使用 WBRT 与持续性淋巴细胞减少症显著相关。在 WBRT 组中,有持续性淋巴细胞减少症和没有持续性淋巴细胞减少症的患者的总生存期有明显差异(中位 2.6 个月和 6.1 个月;P < 0.001)。然而,SRS/SRT 组的生存率没有明显差异(P = 0.60)。结论:本研究表明,SRS/SRT 可能是脑转移患者保留淋巴细胞的首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Treatment Received in Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Analysis. A Novel ATRIP Mutation Detected in an Iranian Family with Familial Clustering of Breast Cancer: A Case Report. Familial Risk Factors in Thyroid Cancer Across Generations and Geographics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Magnetic Resonance of Pulmonary Nodules in Oncological Patients: Are We Ready to Replace Chest CT in Detecting Extrathoracic Cancer? Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction Following Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1