Exposing image splicing traces in scientific publications via uncertainty-guided refinement

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Patterns Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101038
{"title":"Exposing image splicing traces in scientific publications via uncertainty-guided refinement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2024.101038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, a surge in image manipulations in scientific publications has led to numerous retractions, highlighting the importance of image integrity. Although forensic detectors for image duplication and synthesis have been researched, the detection of image splicing in scientific publications remains largely unexplored. Splicing detection is more challenging than duplication detection due to the lack of reference images and more difficult than synthesis detection because of the presence of smaller tampered-with areas. Moreover, disruptive factors in scientific images, such as artifacts, abnormal patterns, and noise, present misleading features like splicing traces, rendering this task difficult. In addition, the scarcity of high-quality datasets of spliced scientific images has limited advancements. Therefore, we propose the uncertainty-guided refinement network (URN) to mitigate these disruptive factors. We also construct a dataset for image splicing detection (SciSp) with 1,290 spliced images by collecting and manually splicing. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the URN’s superior splicing detection performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":"2011 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.101038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, a surge in image manipulations in scientific publications has led to numerous retractions, highlighting the importance of image integrity. Although forensic detectors for image duplication and synthesis have been researched, the detection of image splicing in scientific publications remains largely unexplored. Splicing detection is more challenging than duplication detection due to the lack of reference images and more difficult than synthesis detection because of the presence of smaller tampered-with areas. Moreover, disruptive factors in scientific images, such as artifacts, abnormal patterns, and noise, present misleading features like splicing traces, rendering this task difficult. In addition, the scarcity of high-quality datasets of spliced scientific images has limited advancements. Therefore, we propose the uncertainty-guided refinement network (URN) to mitigate these disruptive factors. We also construct a dataset for image splicing detection (SciSp) with 1,290 spliced images by collecting and manually splicing. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the URN’s superior splicing detection performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过不确定性引导的精炼揭示科学出版物中的图像拼接痕迹
最近,科学出版物中的图像篡改现象激增,导致许多出版物被撤回,这凸显了图像完整性的重要性。尽管针对图像复制和合成的法证检测器已经得到研究,但科学出版物中的图像拼接检测在很大程度上仍未得到探索。由于缺乏参考图像,拼接检测比复制检测更具挑战性;由于存在较小的篡改区域,拼接检测比合成检测更加困难。此外,科学图像中的干扰因素,如人工痕迹、异常模式和噪声,会呈现出拼接痕迹等误导性特征,从而使这项任务变得困难。此外,高质量拼接科学图像数据集的稀缺也限制了研究的进展。因此,我们提出了不确定性引导细化网络(URN)来减少这些干扰因素。我们还通过收集和手动拼接的方式,构建了一个包含 1,290 幅拼接图像的图像拼接检测数据集(SciSp)。综合实验证明了 URN 的卓越拼接检测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Data-knowledge co-driven innovations in engineering and management. Integration of large language models and federated learning. Decorrelative network architecture for robust electrocardiogram classification. Best holdout assessment is sufficient for cancer transcriptomic model selection. The recent Physics and Chemistry Nobel Prizes, AI, and the convergence of knowledge fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1