Evaluating fracture energy predictions using phase-field and gradient-enhanced damage models for elastomers

S. Mohammad Mousavi, Ida Ang, Jason Mulderrig, Nikolaos Bouklas
{"title":"Evaluating fracture energy predictions using phase-field and gradient-enhanced damage models for elastomers","authors":"S. Mohammad Mousavi, Ida Ang, Jason Mulderrig, Nikolaos Bouklas","doi":"arxiv-2408.05162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the phase field method has been increasingly used for brittle\nfractures in soft materials like polymers, elastomers, and biological tissues.\nWhen considering finite deformations to account for the highly deformable\nnature of soft materials, the convergence of the phase-field method becomes\nchallenging, especially in scenarios of unstable crack growth. To overcome\nthese numerical difficulties, several approaches have been introduced, with\nartificial viscosity being among the most widely utilized. This study\ninvestigates the energy release rate due to crack propagation in hyperelastic\nnearly-incompressible materials and compares the phase-field method and a novel\ngradient-enhanced damage (GED) approach. First, we simulate unstable loading\nscenarios using the phase-field method, which leads to convergence problems. To\naddress these issues, we introduce artificial viscosity to stabilize the\nproblem and analyze its impact on the energy release rate utilizing a domain\nJ-integral approach giving quantitative measurements during crack propagation.\nIt is observed that the measured energy released rate during crack propagation\ndoes not comply with the imposed critical energy release rate, and shows\nnon-monotonic behavior. In the second part of the paper, we introduce a novel\nstretch-based GED model as an alternative to the phase-field method for\nmodeling crack evolution in elastomers. It is demonstrated that in this method,\nthe energy release rate can be obtained as an output of the simulation rather\nthan as an input which could be useful in the exploration of rate-dependent\nresponses, as one could directly impose chain-level criteria for damage\ninitiation. We show that while this novel approach provides reasonable results\nfor fracture simulations, it still suffers from some numerical issues that\nstrain-based GED formulations are known to be susceptible to.","PeriodicalId":501146,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Soft Condensed Matter","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Soft Condensed Matter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the phase field method has been increasingly used for brittle fractures in soft materials like polymers, elastomers, and biological tissues. When considering finite deformations to account for the highly deformable nature of soft materials, the convergence of the phase-field method becomes challenging, especially in scenarios of unstable crack growth. To overcome these numerical difficulties, several approaches have been introduced, with artificial viscosity being among the most widely utilized. This study investigates the energy release rate due to crack propagation in hyperelastic nearly-incompressible materials and compares the phase-field method and a novel gradient-enhanced damage (GED) approach. First, we simulate unstable loading scenarios using the phase-field method, which leads to convergence problems. To address these issues, we introduce artificial viscosity to stabilize the problem and analyze its impact on the energy release rate utilizing a domain J-integral approach giving quantitative measurements during crack propagation. It is observed that the measured energy released rate during crack propagation does not comply with the imposed critical energy release rate, and shows non-monotonic behavior. In the second part of the paper, we introduce a novel stretch-based GED model as an alternative to the phase-field method for modeling crack evolution in elastomers. It is demonstrated that in this method, the energy release rate can be obtained as an output of the simulation rather than as an input which could be useful in the exploration of rate-dependent responses, as one could directly impose chain-level criteria for damage initiation. We show that while this novel approach provides reasonable results for fracture simulations, it still suffers from some numerical issues that strain-based GED formulations are known to be susceptible to.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用弹性体相场和梯度增强损伤模型评估断裂能量预测
近来,相场方法越来越多地用于聚合物、弹性体和生物组织等软材料的脆性断裂。当考虑有限变形以解释软材料的高变形性时,相场方法的收敛性变得非常困难,尤其是在裂纹生长不稳定的情况下。为了克服这些数值困难,人们引入了几种方法,其中人工粘度是应用最广泛的方法之一。本研究调查了超弹性近不可压缩材料中裂纹扩展引起的能量释放率,并比较了相场法和一种新型梯度增强损伤(GED)方法。首先,我们使用相场法模拟了不稳定的加载情况,这导致了收敛问题。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了人工粘度来稳定问题,并利用定域 J 积分方法分析其对能量释放率的影响,从而在裂纹扩展过程中进行定量测量。在论文的第二部分,我们介绍了一种新颖的基于拉伸的 GED 模型,作为相场法的替代方法来模拟弹性体中的裂纹演变。研究表明,在这种方法中,能量释放率可以作为模拟的输出而不是输入来获得,这对于探索依赖速率的响应非常有用,因为我们可以直接施加链级标准来确定损伤的起始点。我们发现,虽然这种新方法为断裂模拟提供了合理的结果,但它仍然存在一些众所周知的基于应变的 GED 公式容易出现的数值问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The elastica sling Lifting a granular box by a half-buried rod Length scales in electrolytes Mapping self-avoiding walk on obstacle-ridden lattice onto chelation of heavy metal ions: Monte Carlo study Universality of the close packing properties and markers of isotropic-to-tetratic phase change in quasi-one-dimensional superdisk fluid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1