{"title":"Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping of West Sikkim District, India using MCDA techniques","authors":"Suvankar Naskar, Aneesah Rahaman, Brototi Biswas","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-05158-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest fire poses a major environmental hazard, to the extent of sometimes permanently damaging the forest ecology. The potential of human to repair nature is hampered by the extension of human domination into forests, which results in the loss of forest land. While human expansion cannot be stopped, we must accept responsibility for the consequences and thus work to minimize such environmental hazards emanating from such calamities. RS and GIS have proved to be useful techniques for such studies. The goal of the current study is to identify the most vulnerable forest fire zones in the West Sikkim district falling within the state of Sikkim (India) during 2004–2021. Various thematic layers (LULC and topographical factors) were created using Landsat 8 OLI and ASTER DEM. For the final forest fire susceptibility zone (FFSZ) map, climate variables such as precipitation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed were also used. The authors employed the MCDM techniques of AHP and TOPSIS to determine the areas which are most vulnerable to wildfires in the research area. 194 wildfire locations, as obtained from Sikkim State Disaster Management Authority (SDMA) were used for the classification. The FFSZ were classified as “very high, high, medium, low, and very low vulnerability zones” based on their fire vulnerability. The areas under the “Very High Susceptibility Zone” of AHP and TOPSIS were 152.331 km<sup>2</sup> and 348.499 km<sup>2</sup> respectively whereas the areas under “Very Low Susceptibility Zone” were 115.351 km<sup>2</sup> and 139.436 km<sup>2</sup> in the results of AHP and TOPSIS respectively. To check the accuracy of the FFSZ susceptibility maps obtained from the two modelling techniques, the same was confirmed by using (Receiver Operating Characteristics) ROC curves. The result indicates that the TOPSIS model (AUC = 82.28%) is slightly better at determining the vulnerable zones than the AHP method (AUC = 72.25%).</p>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05158-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest fire poses a major environmental hazard, to the extent of sometimes permanently damaging the forest ecology. The potential of human to repair nature is hampered by the extension of human domination into forests, which results in the loss of forest land. While human expansion cannot be stopped, we must accept responsibility for the consequences and thus work to minimize such environmental hazards emanating from such calamities. RS and GIS have proved to be useful techniques for such studies. The goal of the current study is to identify the most vulnerable forest fire zones in the West Sikkim district falling within the state of Sikkim (India) during 2004–2021. Various thematic layers (LULC and topographical factors) were created using Landsat 8 OLI and ASTER DEM. For the final forest fire susceptibility zone (FFSZ) map, climate variables such as precipitation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed were also used. The authors employed the MCDM techniques of AHP and TOPSIS to determine the areas which are most vulnerable to wildfires in the research area. 194 wildfire locations, as obtained from Sikkim State Disaster Management Authority (SDMA) were used for the classification. The FFSZ were classified as “very high, high, medium, low, and very low vulnerability zones” based on their fire vulnerability. The areas under the “Very High Susceptibility Zone” of AHP and TOPSIS were 152.331 km2 and 348.499 km2 respectively whereas the areas under “Very Low Susceptibility Zone” were 115.351 km2 and 139.436 km2 in the results of AHP and TOPSIS respectively. To check the accuracy of the FFSZ susceptibility maps obtained from the two modelling techniques, the same was confirmed by using (Receiver Operating Characteristics) ROC curves. The result indicates that the TOPSIS model (AUC = 82.28%) is slightly better at determining the vulnerable zones than the AHP method (AUC = 72.25%).
期刊介绍:
Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues:
-mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development
-technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development
-global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome
-local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context
-development and application of indicators of sustainability
-development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development
-sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development
-impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity
-effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability
-impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development
-role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development
-social and cultural contexts of sustainable development
-role of education and public awareness in sustainable development
-role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development
-shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.