Application of material flow cost accounting (MFCA) in waste reduction: a case study on small and medium-scaled enterprise (SME) corrugation packages industry

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02039-w
Naveed Ahmed, Muhammad Asad Ali, Muhammad Sana, Madiha Rafaqat, Ateekh Ur Rehman
{"title":"Application of material flow cost accounting (MFCA) in waste reduction: a case study on small and medium-scaled enterprise (SME) corrugation packages industry","authors":"Naveed Ahmed, Muhammad Asad Ali, Muhammad Sana, Madiha Rafaqat, Ateekh Ur Rehman","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02039-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nowadays, due to inadequate resource utilization and a lack of comprehensive accounting procedures, many firms face substantial issues in controlling their environmental and cost-related implications. As the global emphasis on sustainability and resource efficiency grows, there is an increasing need for Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) adoption to meet these concerns. In this case study, a small and medium-scaled enterprise (SME) i.e., Corrugation Packages Industry in Pakistan has been selected. The formation of a corrugation box has been considered to evaluate the process waste based on MFCA analysis. The identified areas with high negative costs and their reasons are also elaborated with proposed MFCA-based solutions. The positive and negative costs of entire process have been further examined by material cost (MC), system cost (SC), energy cost (EC), and waste management cost (WC). By successful implementation of the MFCA, it has been found that an improvement in the total cost of about 11.11% (MC), 29.61% (SC), 9.32% (EC), 92.57% (WC) have been obtained, whereas the enhancement in positive costs of about 9.82% (MC), 31.31% (SC), 9.88% (EC), 95.08% (WC) have been recorded, and reduction in negative costs of about 29.50% (MC), 36.56% (SC), 35.52% (EC), and 69.83% (WC) have been noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02039-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, due to inadequate resource utilization and a lack of comprehensive accounting procedures, many firms face substantial issues in controlling their environmental and cost-related implications. As the global emphasis on sustainability and resource efficiency grows, there is an increasing need for Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) adoption to meet these concerns. In this case study, a small and medium-scaled enterprise (SME) i.e., Corrugation Packages Industry in Pakistan has been selected. The formation of a corrugation box has been considered to evaluate the process waste based on MFCA analysis. The identified areas with high negative costs and their reasons are also elaborated with proposed MFCA-based solutions. The positive and negative costs of entire process have been further examined by material cost (MC), system cost (SC), energy cost (EC), and waste management cost (WC). By successful implementation of the MFCA, it has been found that an improvement in the total cost of about 11.11% (MC), 29.61% (SC), 9.32% (EC), 92.57% (WC) have been obtained, whereas the enhancement in positive costs of about 9.82% (MC), 31.31% (SC), 9.88% (EC), 95.08% (WC) have been recorded, and reduction in negative costs of about 29.50% (MC), 36.56% (SC), 35.52% (EC), and 69.83% (WC) have been noted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物料流成本会计(MFCA)在减少废物中的应用:中小型企业(SME)瓦楞包装行业案例研究
如今,由于资源利用不足和缺乏全面的会计程序,许多企业在控制环境和成本相关影响方面面临着重大问题。随着全球对可持续发展和资源效率的日益重视,越来越需要采用物料流成本会计(MFCA)来解决这些问题。本案例研究选择了巴基斯坦的一家中小型企业(SME),即瓦楞包装行业。在 MFCA 分析的基础上,对瓦楞纸箱的形成过程进行了评估。已确定的高负成本领域及其原因也通过基于 MFCA 的解决方案进行了阐述。通过材料成本 (MC)、系统成本 (SC)、能源成本 (EC) 和废物管理成本 (WC),进一步检查了整个流程的正负成本。通过成功实施 MFCA,发现总成本提高了约 11.11%(MC)、29.61%(SC)、9.32%(EC)和 92.57%(WC),而正成本提高了约 9.82%(MC)、31.61%(SC)和 9.32%(EC)。记录显示,正成本增加了约 9.82%(MC)、31.31%(SC)、9.88%(EC)和 95.08%(WC),负成本减少了约 29.50%(MC)、36.56%(SC)、35.52%(EC)和 69.83%(WC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Study on the mechanisms of retardation of cement hydration by zinc and acceleration of hardening by sodium aluminate from crystallographic phase analysis Poultry litter ash potential as a replacement material in cementitious systems: a state-of-the-art review Bottom ash as a solid waste of the palm oil industry turned into a high-value cement replacement for sustainable cement-based materials Biofilms on microplastic surfaces and their effect on pollutant adsorption in the aquatic environment Sustainability performance indicators: improving waste picker organizations in a Brazilian region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1